Anonymous wrote:I think the biggest factor is not worrying about mortgage/bills etc. They don't have to work for a living, that in itself is a HUGE stress factor for majority people.
Anonymous wrote:LOL Good genes. No.
Try the best health care and on-call physicians money can buy from birth. Their problems are solved before it becomes an issue. The former King got a lung transplant in 1951 before regular America even knew that was a possibility.
Personal trainers. Nutritionists. Chefs who work with the nutritionists. It all adds together for excellent physical aging.
Anonymous wrote:Victoria was a carrier of hemophilia. Two of her daughters and four of her granddaughters were carriers of the disease. A son, three grandsons, and four great-grandsons were all sufferers, most of whom bled to death.
Anonymous wrote:I can’t believe some of the crazy stuff posted here. Charles not fathering Harry, lung transplants, antidementia treatment - WTF. It’s like someone vomited the Enquirer or Weekly World News all over this forum.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder what kind of genes Harry and Meghan’s kids will have
Non royal ones and they'll be the healthiest there.
Yes, the healthiest due to hybrid vigor.
Same with Kate and William's kid.
Kate is a commoner too from blue collar people.
Both men chose well.
No, it’s not the same for Kate and Will’s children. You need to look up the term hybrid vigor. In that family, this applies only to H&M’s future children.
You are spouting junk science. Human beings are all extremely genetically similar to one another, so there isn't anything more variable for H&M than W&K.
NP But yes, there is given that Harry has come from a different paternal line (unknown) than Will. He is not Charles' son by birth, only by upbringing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder what kind of genes Harry and Meghan’s kids will have
Non royal ones and they'll be the healthiest there.
Yes, the healthiest due to hybrid vigor.
Same with Kate and William's kid.
Kate is a commoner too from blue collar people.
Both men chose well.
No, it’s not the same for Kate and Will’s children. You need to look up the term hybrid vigor. In that family, this applies only to H&M’s future children.
You are spouting junk science. Human beings are all extremely genetically similar to one another, so there isn't anything more variable for H&M than W&K.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder what kind of genes Harry and Meghan’s kids will have
Non royal ones and they'll be the healthiest there.
Yes, the healthiest due to hybrid vigor.
Same with Kate and William's kid.
Kate is a commoner too from blue collar people.
Both men chose well.
No, it’s not the same for Kate and Will’s children. You need to look up the term hybrid vigor. In that family, this applies only to H&M’s future children.
You are spouting junk science. Human beings are all extremely genetically similar to one another, so there isn't anything more variable for H&M than W&K.
NP But yes, there is given that Harry has come from a different paternal line (unknown) than Will. He is not Charles' son by birth, only by upbringing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LOL Good genes. No.
Try the best health care and on-call physicians money can buy from birth. Their problems are solved before it becomes an issue. The former King got a lung transplant in 1951 before regular America even knew that was a possibility.
Personal trainers. Nutritionists. Chefs who work with the nutritionists. It all adds together for excellent physical aging.
haha you are so clueless.
They are a sporting family - riders of horses, players of polo etc.
they also get full body MRIs every single year - well, those in direct line to the throne do, and then they have the top specialists in the country looking after them when a problem is detected.
God you Americans are clueless sometimes.
Queen Elizabeth doesn't ride, but she plays the ponies.
https://www.cheatsheet.com/health-fitness/queen-elizabeth-made-8-million-sport-she-absolutely-loves.html/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder what kind of genes Harry and Meghan’s kids will have
Non royal ones and they'll be the healthiest there.
Yes, the healthiest due to hybrid vigor.
Same with Kate and William's kid.
Kate is a commoner too from blue collar people.
Both men chose well.
No, it’s not the same for Kate and Will’s children. You need to look up the term hybrid vigor. In that family, this applies only to H&M’s future children.
You are spouting junk science. Human beings are all extremely genetically similar to one another, so there isn't anything more variable for H&M than W&K.
NP But yes, there is given that Harry has come from a different paternal line (unknown) than Will. He is not Charles' son by birth, only by upbringing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder what kind of genes Harry and Meghan’s kids will have
Non royal ones and they'll be the healthiest there.
Yes, the healthiest due to hybrid vigor.
Same with Kate and William's kid.
Kate is a commoner too from blue collar people.
Both men chose well.
No, it’s not the same for Kate and Will’s children. You need to look up the term hybrid vigor. In that family, this applies only to H&M’s future children.
You are spouting junk science. Human beings are all extremely genetically similar to one another, so there isn't anything more variable for H&M than W&K.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder what kind of genes Harry and Meghan’s kids will have
Non royal ones and they'll be the healthiest there.
Yes, the healthiest due to hybrid vigor.
Same with Kate and William's kid.
Kate is a commoner too from blue collar people.
Both men chose well.
No, it’s not the same for Kate and Will’s children. You need to look up the term hybrid vigor. In that family, this applies only to H&M’s future children.
Anonymous wrote:money, attention to health, physical activity. Also working -- at least in the royal sense (engagements, public appearances). Studies show that work keeps people mentally sharp and that actually retiring to just enjoy yourself is not good for your health. This is true in my experience, I can think of older people in my life who are retired, not that old, and now seem to have a hard time just dealing with going grocery shopping. My FIL was able to work through most of 80s on a reduced schedule and he was pretty sharp through then, and when he retired, his mental faculties went downhill sharply, sadly. Your brain -- you use it or lose it. Working as a older royal (work that you can tailor to your own schedule) probably helps a lot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder what kind of genes Harry and Meghan’s kids will have
Non royal ones and they'll be the healthiest there.
Yes, the healthiest due to hybrid vigor.
Same with Kate and William's kid.
Kate is a commoner too from blue collar people.
Both men chose well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder what kind of genes Harry and Meghan’s kids will have
Non royal ones and they'll be the healthiest there.
Yes, the healthiest due to hybrid vigor.