Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one should be giving these women air or print time. She is a sexual predator. Full stop.
This.
No, not really. At least not in the same way that men are.
First, women are nurturing. Second, the young man was obviously sexually attracted to her. There is a distinct, tangible difference between this kind of relationship and one with a adult man and young woman.
Sorry, it's different, and no one is able to convince me otherwise. Your arguments are all fundamentally flawed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one should be giving these women air or print time. She is a sexual predator. Full stop.
This.
No, not really. At least not in the same way that men are.
First, women are nurturing. Second, the young man was obviously sexually attracted to her. There is a distinct, tangible difference between this kind of relationship and one with a adult man and young woman.
Sorry, it's different, and no one is able to convince me otherwise. Your arguments are all fundamentally flawed.
You are sick. Really, seek help.
Oh, go away.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Gross woman. She left her children from her first marriage to prey on another child. Any man in a similar position would still be locked up.
Would he? The courts are full of Brock Turner and stories of other men to prey on children and women and who are turned loose.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one should be giving these women air or print time. She is a sexual predator. Full stop.
This.
No, not really. At least not in the same way that men are.
First, women are nurturing. Second, the young man was obviously sexually attracted to her. There is a distinct, tangible difference between this kind of relationship and one with a adult man and young woman.
Sorry, it's different, and no one is able to convince me otherwise. Your arguments are all fundamentally flawed.
You are sick. Really, seek help.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Gross woman. She left her children from her first marriage to prey on another child. Any man in a similar position would still be locked up.
Would he? The courts are full of Brock Turner and stories of other men to prey on children and women and who are turned loose.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one should be giving these women air or print time. She is a sexual predator. Full stop.
This.
No, not really. At least not in the same way that men are.
First, women are nurturing. Second, the young man was obviously sexually attracted to her. There is a distinct, tangible difference between this kind of relationship and one with a adult man and young woman.
Sorry, it's different, and no one is able to convince me otherwise. Your arguments are all fundamentally flawed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one should be giving these women air or print time. She is a sexual predator. Full stop.
This.
Anonymous wrote:Gross woman. She left her children from her first marriage to prey on another child. Any man in a similar position would still be locked up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I hope he finds the strength to walk away from her, get a restraining order against her and never talk to her again.
When he was 21, he asked the court to remove the permanent restraining order. He’s a grown man now, and can make his own decisions. I don’t think their relationship is healthy, but they’re adults and can decide for themselves.
Anonymous wrote:No one should be giving these women air or print time. She is a sexual predator. Full stop.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I hope he finds the strength to walk away from her, get a restraining order against her and never talk to her again.
When he was 21, he asked the court to remove the permanent restraining order. He’s a grown man now, and can make his own decisions. I don’t think their relationship is healthy, but they’re adults and can decide for themselves.
Anonymous wrote:
I hope he finds the strength to walk away from her, get a restraining order against her and never talk to her again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She's a predator and should have no contact with children, including her own.
Her children are in their 20’s and 30’s. Should she not be allowed contact with them?
She should be locked up behind bars and she should not be allowed to be around children including her own grandchildren when and if her kids ever have children.
Personally, I do not think that she should be around that young man or their daughters. The level of dysfunction there is very twisted.
That young man is 34 years old.
That is the magic age when a rape victim is no longer a victim of a crime?
He’s 34 years old. He presumably wants to be with her. How do you propose to keep a 34 year old man away from a woman he chooses to be with? And despite what society thinks, he does not consider himself to be a rape victim.