Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You all sound like a bunch of Trump conspiracy theory lunatics. Schools are required to report data like retention rates to the federal government for various programs under penalty of law. US News and other rating organizations audit what’s reported to them through these reports. You can’t just make the stuff up. Why do you think schools report making mistakes? They know they’re going to get caught.
Sometimes I wonder about the level of education and sophistication on DCUM.
And yet, colleges submitting bad data to USNWR: Real News this week that 8 more colleges admitted to submitting incorrect data
https://www.insidehighered.com/admissions/article/2018/08/27/eight-more-colleges-identified-submitting-incorrect-data-us-news
And that’s flat out wrong data. Not choosing to count students this day and not that day or encouraging apps from unqualified students to inflate data.
And, not all of the USNWR data is also collected by the federal government.
Even federal data is self-reported and there are different ways to calculate it. National Center for Education Statistics (IPEDS) is the usual source for resources and there is a lot of variation. Yale for instance has something like 2X the "Instruction" expenditure of Harvard and Princeton. Is that really true?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You all sound like a bunch of Trump conspiracy theory lunatics. Schools are required to report data like retention rates to the federal government for various programs under penalty of law. US News and other rating organizations audit what’s reported to them through these reports. You can’t just make the stuff up. Why do you think schools report making mistakes? They know they’re going to get caught.
Sometimes I wonder about the level of education and sophistication on DCUM.
And yet, colleges submitting bad data to USNWR: Real News this week that 8 more colleges admitted to submitting incorrect data
https://www.insidehighered.com/admissions/article/2018/08/27/eight-more-colleges-identified-submitting-incorrect-data-us-news
And that’s flat out wrong data. Not choosing to count students this day and not that day or encouraging apps from unqualified students to inflate data.
And, not all of the USNWR data is also collected by the federal government.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok, troll, I'll bite.
First, a "smart" UVA student is redundant. They're all smart, or they wouldn't have gotten in.
Second, UVA has one of the highest first-year retention rates in the country: 97 percent, rivaling the Ivy League. So the overwhelming majority of UVA students do not transfer.
Having said that, I know of two students over the years who transferred to VCU for its superior fine arts program. There's a lot of pressure on top NOVA high school students to choose UVA or William and Mary simply because they can get it, when neither is necessarily the best school for their interests.
Well said. So many parents assume if your child gets into one of these schools, they *must* go there. It's ridiculous. There are so many great schools out there, many of which are a better fit.
So many NOVA parents are in the donut hole for financial aid. We can afford WM full pay. We can not afford a $75,000/ year LAC. And we will not qualify for merit. And many/ most higher ranked colleges don’t do merit. It would be great to be able to spend $600,000 over 6 years for kids educations. But as it is, WM will come out at close to $300,000. I’m glad we can afford that.
Cost is a reality for people in a high COL area who are looking at $34k a year for WM, or less for UVA vs $75k for an Ivy. And I do not want my kid to graduate with debt.
You live in a bubble. Yes. It’s because they can get in— and UMC parents can still afford them.
Anonymous wrote:The poster who keeps insisting that UVA is lying or fudging freshman retention statistics should take a look at the latest to US news rankings. According to them, about five or six other flagship universities are also claiming a 97% first year retention rate. Not just University of Virginia. So, if UVA is lying, it’s not lying any more than anyone else or putting itself in an unfair advantage by doing so.
Anonymous wrote:The poster who keeps insisting that UVA is lying or fudging freshman retention statistics should take a look at the latest to US news rankings. According to them, about five or six other flagship universities are also claiming a 97% first year retention rate. Not just University of Virginia. So, if UVA is lying, it’s not lying any more than anyone else or putting itself in an unfair advantage by doing so.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok, troll, I'll bite.
First, a "smart" UVA student is redundant. They're all smart, or they wouldn't have gotten in.
Second, UVA has one of the highest first-year retention rates in the country: 97 percent, rivaling the Ivy League. So the overwhelming majority of UVA students do not transfer.
Having said that, I know of two students over the years who transferred to VCU for its superior fine arts program. There's a lot of pressure on top NOVA high school students to choose UVA or William and Mary simply because they can get it, when neither is necessarily the best school for their interests.
Well said. So many parents assume if your child gets into one of these schools, they *must* go there. It's ridiculous. There are so many great schools out there, many of which are a better fit.
Anonymous wrote:I know a kid who transferred from UVA to Brown after their first year. Their parents were both Ivy alums, though, so I assume that they didn't get in to an Ivy in the first go-around and were using UVA as a stepping stone to transfer into one.
Anonymous wrote:Ok, troll, I'll bite.
First, a "smart" UVA student is redundant. They're all smart, or they wouldn't have gotten in.
Second, UVA has one of the highest first-year retention rates in the country: 97 percent, rivaling the Ivy League. So the overwhelming majority of UVA students do not transfer.
Having said that, I know of two students over the years who transferred to VCU for its superior fine arts program. There's a lot of pressure on top NOVA high school students to choose UVA or William and Mary simply because they can get it, when neither is necessarily the best school for their interests.
Anonymous wrote:It’s so evident that scores of people here think colleges are dishonest, but they still want their kid to go to them.
It’s fascinating.
OR deep down, you know the colleges aren’t lying and your reaction to the uncertainty of the admission process is making you post dumb stuff here out of frustration.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:unless someone can define EXACTLY what freshman retention means, I think a public U with a 97 98 99 % return rate smells a bit fishy. idk why UVA boosters hijacked this thread as if to imply NOBODY transfers out of the university. so weird
The school has a 94.6 percent graduation rate. You can't lie about that one. For that many to graduate you'd have to have something like a 97 percent first year retention rate.
Ok, a new data point. Please define exactly what retention means and exactly what grad rate means. Just an fyi, your logic is faulty, many colleges do NOT include kids who transfer out in that published graduation rate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:unless someone can define EXACTLY what freshman retention means, I think a public U with a 97 98 99 % return rate smells a bit fishy. idk why UVA boosters hijacked this thread as if to imply NOBODY transfers out of the university. so weird
The school has a 94.6 percent graduation rate. You can't lie about that one. For that many to graduate you'd have to have something like a 97 percent first year retention rate.
Ok, a new data point. Please define exactly what retention means and exactly what grad rate means. Just an fyi, your logic is faulty, many colleges do NOT include kids who transfer out in that published graduation rate.
Anonymous wrote:UVA has a freshman retention rate of 97.0%, one of the highest in the nation. So no, not really common.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:unless someone can define EXACTLY what freshman retention means, I think a public U with a 97 98 99 % return rate smells a bit fishy. idk why UVA boosters hijacked this thread as if to imply NOBODY transfers out of the university. so weird
The school has a 94.6 percent graduation rate. You can't lie about that one. For that many to graduate you'd have to have something like a 97 percent first year retention rate.