Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you keep feeding the pay to play system because you fear your kid will miss out, the system will never change.
A $4.5 billion industry that produces mediocre players.
www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sports/sd-sp-us-soccer-pay-to-play-u20s-20180814-story,amp.html
There are maybe a few hundred or so kids across this country with world-class soccer potential; the travel soccer population is orders of magnitude higher, and most of those kids have zero shot at getting anywhere close to that level. They aren't D1 players, to say nothing of MLS. Many of the parents are delusional about that. The only real reason to do travel soccer is because your kid loves and is good at soccer. That's the point, not professional development. Please. Your kid is not going pro, unless he is obviously better than everyone else on the field at the highest level you can think of.
As for why U.S. Soccer "fails," it is because the cream of the crop of our athletes play other sports--they are NBA point guards or power forwards, NFL safeties or wide receivers, etc.
Yep.
Hockey players. Swimmers. Track and field athletes..competitive gymnasts and dancers. Skaters. Skiers.
The US excels in so many other sports. It is no big deal if soccer is left for the rest of the world.
That stupid argument fails with women. Admit it. The best women athletes in massive numbers are playing soccer.
No.
The best female athletes are probably in track and field, women's gymnastics and swimming, plus womens NBA.
This is laughable.
Says a person who is blinded by his/her hatred travel soccer parents.
Womens gymnasts, ounce for ounce, are hands down the best female athletes anywhere.
And that does not mean that they would be good at soccer. Gymnastics is far to specialized to ever bother comparing to any other sport.
That said, gymnastics aside, more travel soccer players could make varsity track, basketball, lacrosse, field hockey, cross country or even swimming than the other way around.
Um...no.
Soccer is one of the simplest sports to pick up for anyone with a bit of athleticism.
Yes, if you play kick and run like Americans which isn’t Futbol. People without touch or ability to do the things FIFA players do at lightning speed. Which even our pros can’t do.
I love how the argument changes. The best US male athletes go into football, baseball and basketball. The sheer number playing in the later years are not in soccer. Got it. Could buy that.
But—Now when the sheer numbers of Us women playing soccer above all other sports in the later years we change the argument that the minute few of gymnasts in comparison are the majority of best athletes.
You people are crazy.
Your argument would be more credible if the US women weren't currently ranked #1 in the world.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you keep feeding the pay to play system because you fear your kid will miss out, the system will never change.
A $4.5 billion industry that produces mediocre players.
www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sports/sd-sp-us-soccer-pay-to-play-u20s-20180814-story,amp.html
There are maybe a few hundred or so kids across this country with world-class soccer potential; the travel soccer population is orders of magnitude higher, and most of those kids have zero shot at getting anywhere close to that level. They aren't D1 players, to say nothing of MLS. Many of the parents are delusional about that. The only real reason to do travel soccer is because your kid loves and is good at soccer. That's the point, not professional development. Please. Your kid is not going pro, unless he is obviously better than everyone else on the field at the highest level you can think of.
As for why U.S. Soccer "fails," it is because the cream of the crop of our athletes play other sports--they are NBA point guards or power forwards, NFL safeties or wide receivers, etc.
Yep.
Hockey players. Swimmers. Track and field athletes..competitive gymnasts and dancers. Skaters. Skiers.
The US excels in so many other sports. It is no big deal if soccer is left for the rest of the world.
That stupid argument fails with women. Admit it. The best women athletes in massive numbers are playing soccer.
No.
The best female athletes are probably in track and field, women's gymnastics and swimming, plus womens NBA.
This is laughable.
Says a person who is blinded by his/her hatred travel soccer parents.
Womens gymnasts, ounce for ounce, are hands down the best female athletes anywhere.
And that does not mean that they would be good at soccer. Gymnastics is far to specialized to ever bother comparing to any other sport.
That said, gymnastics aside, more travel soccer players could make varsity track, basketball, lacrosse, field hockey, cross country or even swimming than the other way around.
Um...no.
Soccer is one of the simplest sports to pick up for anyone with a bit of athleticism.
Yes, if you play kick and run like Americans which isn’t Futbol. People without touch or ability to do the things FIFA players do at lightning speed. Which even our pros can’t do.
I love how the argument changes. The best US male athletes go into football, baseball and basketball. The sheer number playing in the later years are not in soccer. Got it. Could buy that.
But—Now when the sheer numbers of Us women playing soccer above all other sports in the later years we change the argument that the minute few of gymnasts in comparison are the majority of best athletes.
You people are crazy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you keep feeding the pay to play system because you fear your kid will miss out, the system will never change.
A $4.5 billion industry that produces mediocre players.
www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sports/sd-sp-us-soccer-pay-to-play-u20s-20180814-story,amp.html
There are maybe a few hundred or so kids across this country with world-class soccer potential; the travel soccer population is orders of magnitude higher, and most of those kids have zero shot at getting anywhere close to that level. They aren't D1 players, to say nothing of MLS. Many of the parents are delusional about that. The only real reason to do travel soccer is because your kid loves and is good at soccer. That's the point, not professional development. Please. Your kid is not going pro, unless he is obviously better than everyone else on the field at the highest level you can think of.
As for why U.S. Soccer "fails," it is because the cream of the crop of our athletes play other sports--they are NBA point guards or power forwards, NFL safeties or wide receivers, etc.
Yep.
Hockey players. Swimmers. Track and field athletes..competitive gymnasts and dancers. Skaters. Skiers.
The US excels in so many other sports. It is no big deal if soccer is left for the rest of the world.
That stupid argument fails with women. Admit it. The best women athletes in massive numbers are playing soccer.
No.
The best female athletes are probably in track and field, women's gymnastics and swimming, plus womens NBA.
This is laughable.
Says a person who is blinded by his/her hatred travel soccer parents.
Womens gymnasts, ounce for ounce, are hands down the best female athletes anywhere.
And that does not mean that they would be good at soccer. Gymnastics is far to specialized to ever bother comparing to any other sport.
That said, gymnastics aside, more travel soccer players could make varsity track, basketball, lacrosse, field hockey, cross country or even swimming than the other way around.
Um...no.
Soccer is one of the simplest sports to pick up for anyone with a bit of athleticism.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you keep feeding the pay to play system because you fear your kid will miss out, the system will never change.
A $4.5 billion industry that produces mediocre players.
www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sports/sd-sp-us-soccer-pay-to-play-u20s-20180814-story,amp.html
There are maybe a few hundred or so kids across this country with world-class soccer potential; the travel soccer population is orders of magnitude higher, and most of those kids have zero shot at getting anywhere close to that level. They aren't D1 players, to say nothing of MLS. Many of the parents are delusional about that. The only real reason to do travel soccer is because your kid loves and is good at soccer. That's the point, not professional development. Please. Your kid is not going pro, unless he is obviously better than everyone else on the field at the highest level you can think of.
As for why U.S. Soccer "fails," it is because the cream of the crop of our athletes play other sports--they are NBA point guards or power forwards, NFL safeties or wide receivers, etc.
Yep.
Hockey players. Swimmers. Track and field athletes..competitive gymnasts and dancers. Skaters. Skiers.
The US excels in so many other sports. It is no big deal if soccer is left for the rest of the world.
That stupid argument fails with women. Admit it. The best women athletes in massive numbers are playing soccer.
No.
The best female athletes are probably in track and field, women's gymnastics and swimming, plus womens NBA.
This is laughable.
Says a person who is blinded by his/her hatred travel soccer parents.
Womens gymnasts, ounce for ounce, are hands down the best female athletes anywhere.
And that does not mean that they would be good at soccer. Gymnastics is far to specialized to ever bother comparing to any other sport.
That said, gymnastics aside, more travel soccer players could make varsity track, basketball, lacrosse, field hockey, cross country or even swimming than the other way around.
Um...no.
Soccer is one of the simplest sports to pick up for anyone with a bit of athleticism.
Anonymous wrote:gymnastics and soccer have very different movements not unlike track (forward).
this thread is pretty dumb. even the premise is not good.
no solutions, because it requires a signifcant change that isn’t realistic or reasonable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you keep feeding the pay to play system because you fear your kid will miss out, the system will never change.
A $4.5 billion industry that produces mediocre players.
www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sports/sd-sp-us-soccer-pay-to-play-u20s-20180814-story,amp.html
There are maybe a few hundred or so kids across this country with world-class soccer potential; the travel soccer population is orders of magnitude higher, and most of those kids have zero shot at getting anywhere close to that level. They aren't D1 players, to say nothing of MLS. Many of the parents are delusional about that. The only real reason to do travel soccer is because your kid loves and is good at soccer. That's the point, not professional development. Please. Your kid is not going pro, unless he is obviously better than everyone else on the field at the highest level you can think of.
As for why U.S. Soccer "fails," it is because the cream of the crop of our athletes play other sports--they are NBA point guards or power forwards, NFL safeties or wide receivers, etc.
Yep.
Hockey players. Swimmers. Track and field athletes..competitive gymnasts and dancers. Skaters. Skiers.
The US excels in so many other sports. It is no big deal if soccer is left for the rest of the world.
That stupid argument fails with women. Admit it. The best women athletes in massive numbers are playing soccer.
No.
The best female athletes are probably in track and field, women's gymnastics and swimming, plus womens NBA.
This is laughable.
Says a person who is blinded by his/her hatred travel soccer parents.
Womens gymnasts, ounce for ounce, are hands down the best female athletes anywhere.
And that does not mean that they would be good at soccer. Gymnastics is far to specialized to ever bother comparing to any other sport.
That said, gymnastics aside, more travel soccer players could make varsity track, basketball, lacrosse, field hockey, cross country or even swimming than the other way around.
Um...no.
Soccer is one of the simplest sports to pick up for anyone with a bit of athleticism.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In other countries the pro clubs pay the youth clubs when they develop and train a kid that goes pro. In the US that is forbidden.
The systems are fundamentally different. Why would we think we can compete against that? makes no sense. When youth soccer talent is worth good cash money, youth soccer talent will be found and developed. But we dont do that and then is not necessarily a bad thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you keep feeding the pay to play system because you fear your kid will miss out, the system will never change.
A $4.5 billion industry that produces mediocre players.
www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sports/sd-sp-us-soccer-pay-to-play-u20s-20180814-story,amp.html
There are maybe a few hundred or so kids across this country with world-class soccer potential; the travel soccer population is orders of magnitude higher, and most of those kids have zero shot at getting anywhere close to that level. They aren't D1 players, to say nothing of MLS. Many of the parents are delusional about that. The only real reason to do travel soccer is because your kid loves and is good at soccer. That's the point, not professional development. Please. Your kid is not going pro, unless he is obviously better than everyone else on the field at the highest level you can think of.
As for why U.S. Soccer "fails," it is because the cream of the crop of our athletes play other sports--they are NBA point guards or power forwards, NFL safeties or wide receivers, etc.
Yep.
Hockey players. Swimmers. Track and field athletes..competitive gymnasts and dancers. Skaters. Skiers.
The US excels in so many other sports. It is no big deal if soccer is left for the rest of the world.
That stupid argument fails with women. Admit it. The best women athletes in massive numbers are playing soccer.
No.
The best female athletes are probably in track and field, women's gymnastics and swimming, plus womens NBA.
This is laughable.
Says a person who is blinded by his/her hatred travel soccer parents.
Womens gymnasts, ounce for ounce, are hands down the best female athletes anywhere.
And that does not mean that they would be good at soccer. Gymnastics is far to specialized to ever bother comparing to any other sport.
That said, gymnastics aside, more travel soccer players could make varsity track, basketball, lacrosse, field hockey, cross country or even swimming than the other way around.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you keep feeding the pay to play system because you fear your kid will miss out, the system will never change.
A $4.5 billion industry that produces mediocre players.
www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sports/sd-sp-us-soccer-pay-to-play-u20s-20180814-story,amp.html
There are maybe a few hundred or so kids across this country with world-class soccer potential; the travel soccer population is orders of magnitude higher, and most of those kids have zero shot at getting anywhere close to that level. They aren't D1 players, to say nothing of MLS. Many of the parents are delusional about that. The only real reason to do travel soccer is because your kid loves and is good at soccer. That's the point, not professional development. Please. Your kid is not going pro, unless he is obviously better than everyone else on the field at the highest level you can think of.
As for why U.S. Soccer "fails," it is because the cream of the crop of our athletes play other sports--they are NBA point guards or power forwards, NFL safeties or wide receivers, etc.
Yep.
Hockey players. Swimmers. Track and field athletes..competitive gymnasts and dancers. Skaters. Skiers.
The US excels in so many other sports. It is no big deal if soccer is left for the rest of the world.
That stupid argument fails with women. Admit it. The best women athletes in massive numbers are playing soccer.
No.
The best female athletes are probably in track and field, women's gymnastics and swimming, plus womens NBA.
This is laughable.
Says a person who is blinded by his/her hatred travel soccer parents.
Womens gymnasts, ounce for ounce, are hands down the best female athletes anywhere.
Anonymous wrote:OMG. It's not time to panic yet? That's it. I'm done.
Urgency was needed years ago to prevent the women going into the garbage heap---but now the rest of the World has caught up and will continue to glide on past.
There are too many dumb people involved in the sport in the US. Dumb in reference to knowledge of the sport, that is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you keep feeding the pay to play system because you fear your kid will miss out, the system will never change.
A $4.5 billion industry that produces mediocre players.
www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sports/sd-sp-us-soccer-pay-to-play-u20s-20180814-story,amp.html
There are maybe a few hundred or so kids across this country with world-class soccer potential; the travel soccer population is orders of magnitude higher, and most of those kids have zero shot at getting anywhere close to that level. They aren't D1 players, to say nothing of MLS. Many of the parents are delusional about that. The only real reason to do travel soccer is because your kid loves and is good at soccer. That's the point, not professional development. Please. Your kid is not going pro, unless he is obviously better than everyone else on the field at the highest level you can think of.
As for why U.S. Soccer "fails," it is because the cream of the crop of our athletes play other sports--they are NBA point guards or power forwards, NFL safeties or wide receivers, etc.
Yep.
Hockey players. Swimmers. Track and field athletes..competitive gymnasts and dancers. Skaters. Skiers.
The US excels in so many other sports. It is no big deal if soccer is left for the rest of the world.
That stupid argument fails with women. Admit it. The best women athletes in massive numbers are playing soccer.
No.
The best female athletes are probably in track and field, women's gymnastics and swimming, plus womens NBA.
This is laughable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you keep feeding the pay to play system because you fear your kid will miss out, the system will never change.
A $4.5 billion industry that produces mediocre players.
www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sports/sd-sp-us-soccer-pay-to-play-u20s-20180814-story,amp.html
There are maybe a few hundred or so kids across this country with world-class soccer potential; the travel soccer population is orders of magnitude higher, and most of those kids have zero shot at getting anywhere close to that level. They aren't D1 players, to say nothing of MLS. Many of the parents are delusional about that. The only real reason to do travel soccer is because your kid loves and is good at soccer. That's the point, not professional development. Please. Your kid is not going pro, unless he is obviously better than everyone else on the field at the highest level you can think of.
As for why U.S. Soccer "fails," it is because the cream of the crop of our athletes play other sports--they are NBA point guards or power forwards, NFL safeties or wide receivers, etc.
Yep.
Hockey players. Swimmers. Track and field athletes..competitive gymnasts and dancers. Skaters. Skiers.
The US excels in so many other sports. It is no big deal if soccer is left for the rest of the world.
That stupid argument fails with women. Admit it. The best women athletes in massive numbers are playing soccer.
No.
The best female athletes are probably in track and field, women's gymnastics and swimming, plus womens NBA.