Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Completely aside from whatever cultural thing is going on, I honestly think that piercing a young baby's ears is practically easier than when we got my DD's ears pierced for her 7th birthday at her request. If she had been 2 months, she wouldn't have been rolling, wouldn't have had hair to get tangled in anything, and would have been fine with me cleaning them. When she was 7, all that stuff was an issue. I strongly considered piercing our second DD's ears for that reason, but DH was against it.
Your examples are exactly why we chose earlier. She had no clue they were even there at 3mo. Cleaning was a breeze. She never touched them once.
So...what about the girls who grow up and DON'T want that? My SIL was literally stuffed and forced into dresses. She hates the outward trappings/signs of femininity, and never got her ears pierced. Why is whether or not your baby daughter would actually WANT pierced ears when she's old enough to know the difference not even a factor in these decisions?!
Oh well. She can take them out.
Will she also be mad I let her eat meat, take Tylenol, use tampons. I don’t know what to tell you.
If she has true lasting issues with these things, the problem is bigger than earrings and vegetarianism.
You can take out the earrings, but not the holes/marks left behind.
Get over yourself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Completely aside from whatever cultural thing is going on, I honestly think that piercing a young baby's ears is practically easier than when we got my DD's ears pierced for her 7th birthday at her request. If she had been 2 months, she wouldn't have been rolling, wouldn't have had hair to get tangled in anything, and would have been fine with me cleaning them. When she was 7, all that stuff was an issue. I strongly considered piercing our second DD's ears for that reason, but DH was against it.
Your examples are exactly why we chose earlier. She had no clue they were even there at 3mo. Cleaning was a breeze. She never touched them once.
So...what about the girls who grow up and DON'T want that? My SIL was literally stuffed and forced into dresses. She hates the outward trappings/signs of femininity, and never got her ears pierced. Why is whether or not your baby daughter would actually WANT pierced ears when she's old enough to know the difference not even a factor in these decisions?!
Oh well. She can take them out.
Will she also be mad I let her eat meat, take Tylenol, use tampons. I don’t know what to tell you.
If she has true lasting issues with these things, the problem is bigger than earrings and vegetarianism.
You can take out the earrings, but not the holes/marks left behind.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Completely aside from whatever cultural thing is going on, I honestly think that piercing a young baby's ears is practically easier than when we got my DD's ears pierced for her 7th birthday at her request. If she had been 2 months, she wouldn't have been rolling, wouldn't have had hair to get tangled in anything, and would have been fine with me cleaning them. When she was 7, all that stuff was an issue. I strongly considered piercing our second DD's ears for that reason, but DH was against it.
Your examples are exactly why we chose earlier. She had no clue they were even there at 3mo. Cleaning was a breeze. She never touched them once.
So...what about the girls who grow up and DON'T want that? My SIL was literally stuffed and forced into dresses. She hates the outward trappings/signs of femininity, and never got her ears pierced. Why is whether or not your baby daughter would actually WANT pierced ears when she's old enough to know the difference not even a factor in these decisions?!
Oh well. She can take them out.
Will she also be mad I let her eat meat, take Tylenol, use tampons. I don’t know what to tell you.
If she has true lasting issues with these things, the problem is bigger than earrings and vegetarianism.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m curious, too OP.
I had mine pierced at 13, and my three girls are all desperate to have theirs pierced earlier.
I’ll be the one to say: it’s trashy to pierce babies’ ears.
I never get this. You guys keep saying it, but no one ever has a good answer as to why its trashy. SO I think it's trashy to attach that thought to someone's baby.
Yes, and I think it's trashy to call people (of any age) trashy.
Now, back to why people pierce babies' ears.
Anonymous wrote:Nigerian here and it's tradition. Not sure why. One of the reasons could be that baby boys and girls wear the same clothes and it's one sure way to tell if a baby is a boy or a girl. It's usually done in the hospitals before discharging mother and baby. It was strange to me when I first moved here to see little girls with unpierced ears. I like the look so I got a second one when I was an adult so I could were two earrings. I am also a mother to girls and all got their ears pierced at about 3 months. No option to do it at the hospital and their pediatrician advised to wait till after their first tetanus shot. The area is usually numbed before piercing. One of my dds didn't cry at all and one cried just a little then slept off.
Anonymous wrote:We’re south Asian and it’s very common to pierce baby girls’ ears but there’s no meaning behind it. I wish I had done it when my daughter was a baby. At five there was a lot of drama.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m curious, too OP.
I had mine pierced at 13, and my three girls are all desperate to have theirs pierced earlier.
I’ll be the one to say: it’s trashy to pierce babies’ ears.
I never get this. You guys keep saying it, but no one ever has a good answer as to why its trashy. SO I think it's trashy to attach that thought to someone's baby.
They aren't your ears to pierce. Modifications to your daughter's body should be made at her discretion when she is old enough to make such a decision. I'm not sure how you can do something like this and then turn around and tell her that her body belongs to her. You've already shown very clearly that it belongs to you and to society.
Anonymous wrote:It’s very common in many cultures. African, middle eastern, south Asian, and some Asian.
It’s just not very common among whole people.
So when someone says it’s trashy, I just think they don’t like what brown people do.
Anonymous wrote:Body mutilation should be done with consent of the person getting it. A baby cannot give consent.
Anonymous wrote:I’m sure it’s significant to some cultures. I’m white, Jewish and baby ear piercing is definitely not a part of my culture or even family. But I like it and my daughter had her’s done at 8 weeks.