Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sigh. I've never understood people who had weddings without inviting kids. In your shoes, I would ask my husband to talk to his brother again and explain that the girls are older than their cousins and that it's unfair to ask them to behave and be decorative at all the events but not invite them to the party.
And then you decide what you want to do.
I've been to plenty of kid-free weddings. Usually they have some kids in them and then they're not present at the reception. Usually these are late evening weddings where the reception starts around little kid bedtime.
The ones I've been to that started late in the evening or went late into the evening where kids were allowed always had multiple kids having meltdowns, especially the ones who were in the wedding. Those kids had often been up since the crack of dawn and had spent the day on their best behavior, smiling when told, being positioned and re-positioned, and paraded around like a little decoration or something. I get why they had the meltdowns, but at the same time, they were always disruptive.
I can see why a couple self-paying would want their reception to be kid-free and less of a hassle.
Anonymous wrote:OMG, you guys are crazy! Just sneak the kids down??
If it was an invitation to a baby shower you wouldn't advocate sneaking them in or just bringing them in regardless of the host's wishes.
If it was a bday party you would NOT advocate for a mom to sneak a random sibling into the mix during drop off.
This is their wedding day and they've chosen NO kids for the reception. Respect their wishes and either show up and comply or don't go. Seriously.
If you really feel THAT strongly, sneak some cake OUT and up to the room for them. They are only looking forward to the IDEA of the wedding as a whole, not the actual act. Probably because it's been hyped up. Kids hate weddings. Do the wedding part and then treat the reception like a date night!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do they plan on doing child innapropriate things at this reception? Ie music filled with curse words, overly drunk?
Probably. They also may not feel like having a kid friendly menu, censoring off color jokes, or indulging children who wish to insert themselves into adult conversations.
The oldest is 10, right? I have a child that age. You could seriously take him to the Met Gala. He would be horrified to eat chicken fingers at a proper dinner. It's not anything like bringing a 3 yo.
You seriously think so, but nobody wants to indulge your precocious little snowflake pretending to be an adult. Also, OP wants the 3yr old to attend everything. BIL knows that an hour really means 'until the parents are done having fun' and I expect he knows the kids in question.
She specifically said it was the older kids, not the 3 year old, and that she had a sitter so they could go back after a little bit. A 10 year-od is pretty grown up and self-aware. To have a 10 yo be your flower girl is a little unusual to begin with, but then to tell her she has to go back to the room afterward is a little insulting. If they didn't want kids at their wedding, they should have not asked kids to participate in their wedding ceremony! I think it's likely that they are childless and clueless and aren't thinking of the kids as real people who have feelings. They're just using them as cute ceremony props.
Anonymous wrote:OMG, you guys are crazy! Just sneak the kids down??
If it was an invitation to a baby shower you wouldn't advocate sneaking them in or just bringing them in regardless of the host's wishes.
If it was a bday party you would NOT advocate for a mom to sneak a random sibling into the mix during drop off.
This is their wedding day and they've chosen NO kids for the reception. Respect their wishes and either show up and comply or don't go. Seriously.
If you really feel THAT strongly, sneak some cake OUT and up to the room for them. They are only looking forward to the IDEA of the wedding as a whole, not the actual act. Probably because it's been hyped up. Kids hate weddings. Do the wedding part and then treat the reception like a date night!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do they plan on doing child innapropriate things at this reception? Ie music filled with curse words, overly drunk?
Probably. They also may not feel like having a kid friendly menu, censoring off color jokes, or indulging children who wish to insert themselves into adult conversations.
The oldest is 10, right? I have a child that age. You could seriously take him to the Met Gala. He would be horrified to eat chicken fingers at a proper dinner. It's not anything like bringing a 3 yo.
You seriously think so, but nobody wants to indulge your precocious little snowflake pretending to be an adult. Also, OP wants the 3yr old to attend everything. BIL knows that an hour really means 'until the parents are done having fun' and I expect he knows the kids in question.
Anonymous wrote:Sigh. I've never understood people who had weddings without inviting kids. In your shoes, I would ask my husband to talk to his brother again and explain that the girls are older than their cousins and that it's unfair to ask them to behave and be decorative at all the events but not invite them to the party.
And then you decide what you want to do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do they plan on doing child innapropriate things at this reception? Ie music filled with curse words, overly drunk?
Probably. They also may not feel like having a kid friendly menu, censoring off color jokes, or indulging children who wish to insert themselves into adult conversations.
The oldest is 10, right? I have a child that age. You could seriously take him to the Met Gala. He would be horrified to eat chicken fingers at a proper dinner. It's not anything like bringing a 3 yo.
Anonymous wrote:I do think the bride and groom can set a no kids rule and everyone else should accept that and not complain about it. BUT I don’t think Brides and Grooms can have it both ways. You don’t invite kids to be part of the ceremony so that you have your perfect set of attendants and cute pics - and then exclude them from the reception. If the kids are part of the wedding party they should be invited to the reception.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do they plan on doing child innapropriate things at this reception? Ie music filled with curse words, overly drunk?
Probably. They also may not feel like having a kid friendly menu, censoring off color jokes, or indulging children who wish to insert themselves into adult conversations.
Anonymous wrote:I would just bring my kids down at some point when the bride and groom are too tied up with other guests to notice. Let them dance and have a piece of cake and bring them back upstairs. Its bull to exclude members of the wedding party.
At my wedding, my mother-in-law ditched the agreed upon color scheme for her dress so she would stand out from my mother and DH's step mother.
Mt SIL took her kids who were my flower girl and ring bearer and left for the reception because she didn't feel like 4 and 6 year olds were appropriate wedding guests. She self selected. They were invited. Other kids were there including BIL's 2 year old.
People do what they want and apologize later, or not. And, life goes on.
Anonymous wrote:Do they plan on doing child innapropriate things at this reception? Ie music filled with curse words, overly drunk?