Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it’s reasonable for you not to want them looking after her and taking her out of state. But tbh I wouldn’t have planned a trip wo my kid in these circumstances.
This
I don't think you sound anxious.
I would never have planned a trip like this. Is it a wedding?
Yes. It is my sisters wedding in Europe. I do not want to go. But I feel like I need to.
So, you go and your husband stays. Why is him attending your sister's wedding more important than taking care of your child?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it’s reasonable for you not to want them looking after her and taking her out of state. But tbh I wouldn’t have planned a trip wo my kid in these circumstances.
This
I don't think you sound anxious.
I would never have planned a trip like this. Is it a wedding?
Yes. It is my sisters wedding in Europe. I do not want to go. But I feel like I need to.
Anonymous wrote:OP, you're complicating this needlessly. Bring the baby to the wedding - get a local sitter, or have your DH watch her for the ceremony. (If they're having a stupid no-kids wedding, just say "oops, the local babysitter fell through, DH stayed back at the hotel, so sorry!"). OR, have your DH stay home with the baby while you go alone. (Again, tell your sister, "Oops, childcare fell through!" if she bitches about DH missing it.)
I would NOT let distant, 70+ grandparents who I didn't trust, and who refused to listen to me, take my 13 month old to their SECOND HOME away from all sources of back-up care (daycare, local sitters, those other local relatives.)
I guess a third option would be to radically shorten the wedding trip to 24 hours (even if it means you're ridiculously tired).
I think in your anxiety you are overthinking this. Focus on the end goal: baby is NOT staying with ILs. And just make that happen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it’s reasonable for you not to want them looking after her and taking her out of state. But tbh I wouldn’t have planned a trip wo my kid in these circumstances.
This
I don't think you sound anxious.
I would never have planned a trip like this. Is it a wedding?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it’s reasonable for you not to want them looking after her and taking her out of state. But tbh I wouldn’t have planned a trip wo my kid in these circumstances.
This
I don't think you sound anxious.
I would never have planned a trip like this. Is it a wedding?
Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't leave a one year old for a week with anyone. Much less someone I didn't trust. This trip will be a disaster, OP. Don't do it.
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s reasonable for you not to want them looking after her and taking her out of state. But tbh I wouldn’t have planned a trip wo my kid in these circumstances.