Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry, but cram shops, tutors, essay consultants and forcing your kid to study 6 hours a day after school != genius
Cal Tech, UCLA, and UC Berkeley at 40%+ Asian students because AA is not practiced must be mistakes.
publics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry, but cram shops, tutors, essay consultants and forcing your kid to study 6 hours a day after school != genius
Cal Tech, UCLA, and UC Berkeley at 40%+ Asian students because AA is not practiced must be mistakes.
Anonymous wrote:Sorry, but cram shops, tutors, essay consultants and forcing your kid to study 6 hours a day after school != genius
Anonymous wrote:The last I checked Asian students don't need anyone's permission before they apply to any college/university. So get off the band wagon of don't apply to Harvard, there are many colleges, find your fit, find where you are valued, etc. If everyone who has a problem with anyone else or a particular institution/situation they go somewhere else and not use the court system why do we have laws and courts for? I don't think you learned much in school/college let alone critical reasoning or your racial animus is clouding your intellectual ability whatever extent you may have.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The scare in the non-Asians is so palpable it is manifesting in the form of denigrating the Asians. If you can't take the heat now just wait and see how hot t gets when your children get to be of your present age and the world they will live in then will be so different from the world you are currently living in. Just think about how the world has changed since your parents were of your current age to the present time. The rate of change going forward will be exponential due to technological advances and increased globalization. If you want to bring up your children to give them the best skills to succeed in their lives, have them love and pursue with passion acquiring knowledge, developing skills and self-learning. Bashing Asians may sooth your anxieties but it will only be temporary.
Asians don't have the best skills. They simply have a cultural norm of slavish studying.
The people who really succeed in this world aren't the ones with the best test scores. Instead they are the creative thinkers. .
Tiger Mom missed the memo on this fact. An education is no guarantee of success in the real world, creativity and soft (people) skills are hugely important, but those are not things you learn in a book.
Anonymous wrote:In the past Blacks were prevented from progressing by applying laws that made slavery legal and later on racial discrimination legal. But the Jewish, Italian, Irish, Polish etc. people could not be stopped for long from achieving success. Now the laws in force leveled the playing field. Overt discrimination is not so easy anymore. There is only subtle discrimination in practice, although it can hinder someone from achieving their true potential it can't prevent them from progressing completely. Hence Asians may be slowed, as the law suit against Harvard indicates, but they will realize their true potential in due course and nobody can stop them. Better get used to them on the playing field and learn to compete with all than to nurture animus towards them. In our country everyone has the right to approach the courts to seek redress iif they feel they are wronged. That is what the lawsuit against Harvard is about. Let it play out in courts, possibly all the way to the Supreme Court. We all will, including Harvard and Asians, will live with the Supreme Court decision.
As an aside, refresh my memory as to how many non-WASP POTUS have we had since the independence? JFK and BHO. Only two. Should women and non-Christians, boycott presidential elections or migrate to some other country/ies as some people here on suggesting Asians should boycott Harvard and enroll in other colleges?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, again, where does the 22% come from?
Again, as was stated above, it's the percentage of Asians admitted to Harvard the last two years.
Which, again, prompts my question of what rationale (reason, principle) makes this number the dividing line between fair and unfair admissions?
define fair
If non-Asian students with equal credentials are admitted, refusing admission to Asian students with identical credentials is giving less consideration of interest to Asians. Fairness requires giving equal consideration of interest to all students.
No such thing. Do you understand what holistic admissions means? Some are legacies, some have sports, some have parents who are big donors, some are URMs. Asians are not URMs.
"Holistic admission" historically had been used to discriminate against Jewish students and to keep them out of Ivy League. It's a code word for a racist policy.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.businessinsider.com/the-ivy-leagues-history-of-discriminating-against-jews-2014-12
and completely legal.
So keeping Jews out was completely legal? The above article also suggests the Harvard president who came out with this idea back in 1930s also had some other "solutions" to the Jewish issues as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, again, where does the 22% come from?
Again, as was stated above, it's the percentage of Asians admitted to Harvard the last two years.
Which, again, prompts my question of what rationale (reason, principle) makes this number the dividing line between fair and unfair admissions?
define fair
If non-Asian students with equal credentials are admitted, refusing admission to Asian students with identical credentials is giving less consideration of interest to Asians. Fairness requires giving equal consideration of interest to all students.
No such thing. Do you understand what holistic admissions means? Some are legacies, some have sports, some have parents who are big donors, some are URMs. Asians are not URMs.
"Holistic admission" historically had been used to discriminate against Jewish students and to keep them out of Ivy League. It's a code word for a racist policy.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.businessinsider.com/the-ivy-leagues-history-of-discriminating-against-jews-2014-12
and completely legal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, again, where does the 22% come from?
Again, as was stated above, it's the percentage of Asians admitted to Harvard the last two years.
Which, again, prompts my question of what rationale (reason, principle) makes this number the dividing line between fair and unfair admissions?
define fair
If non-Asian students with equal credentials are admitted, refusing admission to Asian students with identical credentials is giving less consideration of interest to Asians. Fairness requires giving equal consideration of interest to all students.
No such thing. Do you understand what holistic admissions means? Some are legacies, some have sports, some have parents who are big donors, some are URMs. Asians are not URMs.
"Holistic admission" historically had been used to discriminate against Jewish students and to keep them out of Ivy League. It's a code word for a racist policy.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.businessinsider.com/the-ivy-leagues-history-of-discriminating-against-jews-2014-12
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, again, where does the 22% come from?
Again, as was stated above, it's the percentage of Asians admitted to Harvard the last two years.
Which, again, prompts my question of what rationale (reason, principle) makes this number the dividing line between fair and unfair admissions?
define fair
If non-Asian students with equal credentials are admitted, refusing admission to Asian students with identical credentials is giving less consideration of interest to Asians. Fairness requires giving equal consideration of interest to all students.
No such thing. Do you understand what holistic admissions means? Some are legacies, some have sports, some have parents who are big donors, some are URMs. Asians are not URMs.
"Holistic admission" historically had been used to discriminate against Jewish students and to keep them out of Ivy League. It's a code word for a racist policy.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.businessinsider.com/the-ivy-leagues-history-of-discriminating-against-jews-2014-12