Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It sucks. But, I really don't think any kid should be trying to do two travel sports in the same season.
1) it automatically teaches kids the wrong thing--- not making a commitment to the team.
Any kid that is going to sign up for travel has a commitment to the Coach and teammates. It's really infuriating to have players miss tournaments or games for another sport.
My kids were athletic and did very well in multiple sports at a young age---soccer, flag football, lacrosse, baseball, basketball.
But, I only let them play one travel sport per season. With soccer, it's pretty much year-round.
I also tried to minimize signing up for any sport that would have conflicts. So--it was winter Rec basketball and travel soccer. One year--flag football (games Saturdays) and travel soccer(games Sundays).
I found baseball to hard to juggle since the increase and games, length of practices, game times. It would have required a full-time commitment that wasn't possible with travel soccer. I do know kids that do it. When they get to a higher team in soccer--the coach usually makes them make a choice. I am sure the travel baseball coach does the same.
It's just not fair to teammates to have teammates that repeatedly miss games/practices.
Again, NO!
Youth travel sports at 8 years old are not about "Commitment to the Team". They are about exposing CHILDREN to a sport and teaching them the necessary skills to succeed in that sport. If the kid, without practice, is still good enough to start over your child you need to worry more about your kid and less about someone else's kid. If the other kid does decide to take baseball more seriously my guess is your kid still isn't starting.
Do you ask your kid everyday after school what kids were not in class that day? As long as there are enough kids to have practice and field a team for a game the attendance of the other kid is not something that affects your kid at all.
You are so wrong.
If your kid cannot make it to practice, even for his rec team, he only should be playing the minimum
I dont think you understand how rec teams work. It's about learning.
I don't think you understand being part of a team.
You're not making sense.
Take MSI rec soccer, age 7. One kid is a star. Natural talent, etc. Shows up to practice. Other kid AWFUL. Shows up to practice because forced by parents. During a game, star kid is a star, while other kid literally picks flowers and even scores once for the other team.
Both are getting equal playing time, but the star is frustrated because the other kid is awful. Star plays other sports where teammates are better, so he prefers to play there. Rec team suffers.
Is it about learning, or sports mentality, or fairness? You can't have it all.
Anonymous wrote:the main point is no matter what age or level if your on a team your making a commitment to your teammates and coaches. teach your kids to fulfill them.. if they don't like don't put them on the team again. if its just for fun take your kid to the park and play with them. but if your on a team you owe it to the team to not only show up but give your best effort. not saying you have to be the best but you should demand your child give his best. if not everyone suffers. team sports is about learning and competing at whatever level. hence the word sport. take your kids out to play for just fun it requires no commitment to others
What they are saying is that signing up for 2 sports when you know you will be missing all practices and just popping in for games now and then, is utterly unfair to everyone else on the team, even if that team is just rec.
The debate is coming in response to to the poster who said they had one travel soccer kid on their rec team who attended zero practices and missed a ton of games.
At that point, there is no point in bothering to play on that rec team. The parents need to quit being selfish and commit to what they can commit to instead of signing up for everything just so they can brag about how many sports their kid plays.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one is saying kids should not play 2 sports.
What they are saying is that signing up for 2 sports when you know you will be missing all practices and just popping in for games now and then, is utterly unfair to everyone else on the team, even if that team is just rec.
The debate is coming in response to to the poster who said they had one travel soccer kid on their rec team who attended zero practices and missed a ton of games.
At that point, there is no point in bothering to play on that rec team. The parents need to quit being selfish and commit to what they can commit to instead of signing up for everything just so they can brag about how many sports their kid plays.
Says the parent of the non-athletic kid. Not everyone is cut out for sports.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you skip every practice to only show up for games as a starter or star player, you are not part of the team. You are nothing more than a ringer.
An 8 year old ringer now?
If he is not part of the team than what is he then?
Somebody with a parent that brings him to games.
Team builds together. Teams put in the work together.
There is no “I” in team.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Little league baseball is a time suck compared to travel soccer. Travel soccer games are an hour. Baseball games can last over 2 hours. Starting at age 8, the better kids are in a kid pitch division and playing with 9 year olds and developing 10 year olds. If your 8 year old has never played then he might play with 6,7 and 8 year olds.
Little league goes by however old you are on Sept.1st. Is your child still going to be 8 or will they be 9 by Sept. 1st.
Trying to do travel soccer and little league at 9 is really hard. My son wanted to play little league and winter basketball and travel soccer. To do so he had to bump down a soccer level and went from A team to B team. It was worth it to him and for us to be able to play multiple sports. He couldn't miss any soccer practices on A team to play other sports, but he can alternate practices between b team practices and other sports.
I disagree that it is hard. My son - middle school age - has done travel soccer and Little League for over 4 years. What did make it a pain was adding travel baseball in this year on top! We didn't have many conflicts - if we did we usually split them though now that he is the goalie it's harder to make soccer. But, for us soccer is usually Friday evening or Saturday morning/mid day. Little League is usually Saturday midday to evening and travel baseball is Sunday mornings. Lot of baseball.
But, he can't pick and I don't think he should!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It sucks. But, I really don't think any kid should be trying to do two travel sports in the same season.
1) it automatically teaches kids the wrong thing--- not making a commitment to the team.
Any kid that is going to sign up for travel has a commitment to the Coach and teammates. It's really infuriating to have players miss tournaments or games for another sport.
My kids were athletic and did very well in multiple sports at a young age---soccer, flag football, lacrosse, baseball, basketball.
But, I only let them play one travel sport per season. With soccer, it's pretty much year-round.
I also tried to minimize signing up for any sport that would have conflicts. So--it was winter Rec basketball and travel soccer. One year--flag football (games Saturdays) and travel soccer(games Sundays).
I found baseball to hard to juggle since the increase and games, length of practices, game times. It would have required a full-time commitment that wasn't possible with travel soccer. I do know kids that do it. When they get to a higher team in soccer--the coach usually makes them make a choice. I am sure the travel baseball coach does the same.
It's just not fair to teammates to have teammates that repeatedly miss games/practices.
Again, NO!
Youth travel sports at 8 years old are not about "Commitment to the Team". They are about exposing CHILDREN to a sport and teaching them the necessary skills to succeed in that sport. If the kid, without practice, is still good enough to start over your child you need to worry more about your kid and less about someone else's kid. If the other kid does decide to take baseball more seriously my guess is your kid still isn't starting.
Do you ask your kid everyday after school what kids were not in class that day? As long as there are enough kids to have practice and field a team for a game the attendance of the other kid is not something that affects your kid at all.
You are so wrong.
If your kid cannot make it to practice, even for his rec team, he only should be playing the minimum
I dont think you understand how rec teams work. It's about learning.
I don't think you understand being part of a team.
You're not making sense.
Take MSI rec soccer, age 7. One kid is a star. Natural talent, etc. Shows up to practice. Other kid AWFUL. Shows up to practice because forced by parents. During a game, star kid is a star, while other kid literally picks flowers and even scores once for the other team.
Both are getting equal playing time, but the star is frustrated because the other kid is awful. Star plays other sports where teammates are better, so he prefers to play there. Rec team suffers.
Is it about learning, or sports mentality, or fairness? You can't have it all.
How does a Rec team at age 7 suffer? Not winning? Are scores even kept at that age? Does the play really change if one player it not playing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It sucks. But, I really don't think any kid should be trying to do two travel sports in the same season.
1) it automatically teaches kids the wrong thing--- not making a commitment to the team.
Any kid that is going to sign up for travel has a commitment to the Coach and teammates. It's really infuriating to have players miss tournaments or games for another sport.
My kids were athletic and did very well in multiple sports at a young age---soccer, flag football, lacrosse, baseball, basketball.
But, I only let them play one travel sport per season. With soccer, it's pretty much year-round.
I also tried to minimize signing up for any sport that would have conflicts. So--it was winter Rec basketball and travel soccer. One year--flag football (games Saturdays) and travel soccer(games Sundays).
I found baseball to hard to juggle since the increase and games, length of practices, game times. It would have required a full-time commitment that wasn't possible with travel soccer. I do know kids that do it. When they get to a higher team in soccer--the coach usually makes them make a choice. I am sure the travel baseball coach does the same.
It's just not fair to teammates to have teammates that repeatedly miss games/practices.
Again, NO!
Youth travel sports at 8 years old are not about "Commitment to the Team". They are about exposing CHILDREN to a sport and teaching them the necessary skills to succeed in that sport. If the kid, without practice, is still good enough to start over your child you need to worry more about your kid and less about someone else's kid. If the other kid does decide to take baseball more seriously my guess is your kid still isn't starting.
Do you ask your kid everyday after school what kids were not in class that day? As long as there are enough kids to have practice and field a team for a game the attendance of the other kid is not something that affects your kid at all.
You are so wrong.
If your kid cannot make it to practice, even for his rec team, he only should be playing the minimum
I dont think you understand how rec teams work. It's about learning.
I don't think you understand being part of a team.
You're not making sense.
Take MSI rec soccer, age 7. One kid is a star. Natural talent, etc. Shows up to practice. Other kid AWFUL. Shows up to practice because forced by parents. During a game, star kid is a star, while other kid literally picks flowers and even scores once for the other team.
Both are getting equal playing time, but the star is frustrated because the other kid is awful. Star plays other sports where teammates are better, so he prefers to play there. Rec team suffers.
Is it about learning, or sports mentality, or fairness? You can't have it all.
Anonymous wrote:No one is saying kids should not play 2 sports.
What they are saying is that signing up for 2 sports when you know you will be missing all practices and just popping in for games now and then, is utterly unfair to everyone else on the team, even if that team is just rec.
The debate is coming in response to to the poster who said they had one travel soccer kid on their rec team who attended zero practices and missed a ton of games.
At that point, there is no point in bothering to play on that rec team. The parents need to quit being selfish and commit to what they can commit to instead of signing up for everything just so they can brag about how many sports their kid plays.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It sucks. But, I really don't think any kid should be trying to do two travel sports in the same season.
1) it automatically teaches kids the wrong thing--- not making a commitment to the team.
Any kid that is going to sign up for travel has a commitment to the Coach and teammates. It's really infuriating to have players miss tournaments or games for another sport.
My kids were athletic and did very well in multiple sports at a young age---soccer, flag football, lacrosse, baseball, basketball.
But, I only let them play one travel sport per season. With soccer, it's pretty much year-round.
I also tried to minimize signing up for any sport that would have conflicts. So--it was winter Rec basketball and travel soccer. One year--flag football (games Saturdays) and travel soccer(games Sundays).
I found baseball to hard to juggle since the increase and games, length of practices, game times. It would have required a full-time commitment that wasn't possible with travel soccer. I do know kids that do it. When they get to a higher team in soccer--the coach usually makes them make a choice. I am sure the travel baseball coach does the same.
It's just not fair to teammates to have teammates that repeatedly miss games/practices.
Again, NO!
Youth travel sports at 8 years old are not about "Commitment to the Team". They are about exposing CHILDREN to a sport and teaching them the necessary skills to succeed in that sport. If the kid, without practice, is still good enough to start over your child you need to worry more about your kid and less about someone else's kid. If the other kid does decide to take baseball more seriously my guess is your kid still isn't starting.
Do you ask your kid everyday after school what kids were not in class that day? As long as there are enough kids to have practice and field a team for a game the attendance of the other kid is not something that affects your kid at all.
You are so wrong.
If your kid cannot make it to practice, even for his rec team, he only should be playing the minimum
I dont think you understand how rec teams work. It's about learning.
I don't think you understand being part of a team.
Anonymous wrote:No one is saying kids should not play 2 sports.
What they are saying is that signing up for 2 sports when you know you will be missing all practices and just popping in for games now and then, is utterly unfair to everyone else on the team, even if that team is just rec.
The debate is coming in response to to the poster who said they had one travel soccer kid on their rec team who attended zero practices and missed a ton of games.
At that point, there is no point in bothering to play on that rec team. The parents need to quit being selfish and commit to what they can commit to instead of signing up for everything just so they can brag about how many sports their kid plays.