Anonymous wrote:You could also go as Batman and Catwoman, or Neo and Trinity from The Matrix.
Anonymous wrote:I don't think it's entitled planners, it's the entitled bride and groom. I say no to destination weddings and would definitely say no to anything that required a costume.Anonymous wrote:
Unlike "black tie", or "white tie", which are conventions of longstanding that guests are supposed to know, "black on black" means... who the heck knows?
Another example of entitled wedding planning.
Anonymous wrote:You could also go as Batman and Catwoman, or Neo and Trinity from The Matrix.
Anonymous wrote:I greatly look forward to all of your future posts on the Family Relationships forum...
Man, she went All. The. Way. with the black on black wedding! I mean, that takes guts. I've seen this done once, but only in the wedding party and immediate family form not all guests. I will admit, the pictures looked amazing. All of the men looked awesome in their solid black look and it made the bridesmaid's color dresses pop even more.
I don't think it's entitled planners, it's the entitled bride and groom. I say no to destination weddings and would definitely say no to anything that required a costume.Anonymous wrote:
Unlike "black tie", or "white tie", which are conventions of longstanding that guests are supposed to know, "black on black" means... who the heck knows?
Another example of entitled wedding planning.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:RSVP no. People are so rude.
You have no idea. This is also a destination wedding and airfare is $1000+. So we’re expected to schlep a tux through Europe?
Please tell me that this is the wedding of a sibling, or someone who donated a kidney to you, because I can’t underwhy you would bother for anyone else.
OP here, yes sibling. I've already committed to the airfare for my family, so I'm going.