Anonymous wrote:They shouldn't redraw boundaries until closer to Reed opening. We've seen how projections lead to bad decisions when they are made so far out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m new to Arlington and am currently zoned to one of the listed schools. Silly me thought I could send my kids to the neighborhood school 2 blocks to my house. Can someone please explain to me why the option programs are preferable to having kids attend a neighborhood school and allow transfers in from overcrowded schools?
When I moved here, I thought my children would go to the school 4 blocks from my house. Nope, option. We only looked at a map which does not designate such things. THen, we though kids would go to the one 1 mile away. Nope, not the one 1.2 m away, or 1.4. No, our kids are bussed to a school 2 miles away when 5 FIVE are closer.
APS loves to waste money
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m new to Arlington and am currently zoned to one of the listed schools. Silly me thought I could send my kids to the neighborhood school 2 blocks to my house. Can someone please explain to me why the option programs are preferable to having kids attend a neighborhood school and allow transfers in from overcrowded schools?
When I moved here, I thought my children would go to the school 4 blocks from my house. Nope, option. We only looked at a map which does not designate such things. THen, we though kids would go to the one 1 mile away. Nope, not the one 1.2 m away, or 1.4. No, our kids are bussed to a school 2 miles away when 5 FIVE are closer.
APS loves to waste money
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They shouldn't redraw boundaries until closer to Reed opening. We've seen how projections lead to bad decisions when they are made so far out.
They are accounting for this, the current timeline includes reviewing enrollment projections again in the Fall of 2020 to see if they need to make any boundary adjustments for the following school year when Reed opens.
Do you think APS will bus kids PAST Reed to McK? that little sliver of homes at the furthest point east is thinking that will happen but that's just TOO Illogical, right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They shouldn't redraw boundaries until closer to Reed opening. We've seen how projections lead to bad decisions when they are made so far out.
They are accounting for this, the current timeline includes reviewing enrollment projections again in the Fall of 2020 to see if they need to make any boundary adjustments for the following school year when Reed opens.
Do you think APS will bus kids PAST Reed to McK? that little sliver of homes at the furthest point east is thinking that will happen but that's just TOO Illogical, right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They shouldn't redraw boundaries until closer to Reed opening. We've seen how projections lead to bad decisions when they are made so far out.
They are accounting for this, the current timeline includes reviewing enrollment projections again in the Fall of 2020 to see if they need to make any boundary adjustments for the following school year when Reed opens.
Anonymous wrote:I’m new to Arlington and am currently zoned to one of the listed schools. Silly me thought I could send my kids to the neighborhood school 2 blocks to my house. Can someone please explain to me why the option programs are preferable to having kids attend a neighborhood school and allow transfers in from overcrowded schools?
Anonymous wrote:I like the idea of pulling preschool out of Jamestown and opening it up as option to fill up to a certain number.
Anonymous wrote:I’m not from nw Arlington (I live in Rosslyn), but one idea that was floated last spring was the idea of upper and lower elementary schools. I wonder if that might be a possible compromise. Keep the schools where they are, but have tuckahoe be the lower elementary and Nottingham be the upper elementary. Since there are a lot of overlap in the walk zones, this would allow for a lot of parents to walk at least part of the time their kids are in school, and you could have a courtesy bus between the two schools to help with logistics at drop off for people with multiple children. Have one big attendance zone so you’re not creating really creating wierd lines down the county to fill schools that are too close together. You could also have a joint pta so it still feels like a cohesive community.
Just a thought. My understanding is that the schools are within a mile of each other, which is why I think this is feasible.
You could have a similar pairing between Jamestown and discovery. Though maybe it makes more sense for Jamestown to be an option school.
Anonymous wrote:They shouldn't redraw boundaries until closer to Reed opening. We've seen how projections lead to bad decisions when they are made so far out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:By 2021 they will likely need all those seats in the NW.
And this is what is driving almost all of the parents that I have talked to. Many areas in the county are growing, but some less so than others. The NW Quadrant continues to see growth in school aged children. Some of it is coming from new development, but a lot is still coming from tear downs and the like. A single point in time excess of a couple hundred seats does not justify a move without full consideration of growth projections, which the staff IS NOT using or even considering in these location decisions.
Agreed. The staff is looking at planned developments, but not considering individual changes in housing stock. Yes, Tuckahoe is getting the Suntrust townhouses, some of which presumably will be purchased by families with elementary-aged children. Over here by Nottingham, I can look out my front window and see four tear-down/rebuilds in various stages just along my block, all of which are already under contract to families with young children. But the staff won't take those children into consideration at all in their planning because each is an individual housing project rather than a multi-unit project.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:By 2021 they will likely need all those seats in the NW.
And this is what is driving almost all of the parents that I have talked to. Many areas in the county are growing, but some less so than others. The NW Quadrant continues to see growth in school aged children. Some of it is coming from new development, but a lot is still coming from tear downs and the like. A single point in time excess of a couple hundred seats does not justify a move without full consideration of growth projections, which the staff IS NOT using or even considering in these location decisions.