Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Almost never works out for the women I know.
Most women I know did it, and it worked for them.
+1
Same. Actually probably all the women (save for a few religious ones I don't know too well, I just assume they didn't) I know lived together first, before engagement.
But some people don't seem to get that for some of us, when you live together, you're not necessarily striving to "get your boyfriend to marry you" or even "testing" him. For me, it was just a natural next-step to take in a relationship that was working and we were spending tons of time together anyway. I wasn't gunning for a ring, and I wasn't "planning" anything. I was living my life and enjoying being with him. And he the same with me. Then he proposed and we got married. He had asked me to move in, he asked me to marry him.
Oh and it was SO MUCH more fun to be dating and having all that time to spend together than married with children and all the drudgeries associated with that. We miss it.
Some of these points of view are super depressing - like dating is some sort of sparring match when you're just trying to out-smart your boyfriend/girlfriend or some sort of contest where you both try to take as much from the other as possible while giving as little as possible. I mean, WTF? So messed up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Almost never works out for the women I know.
Most women I know did it, and it worked for them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just curious as it came up in conversation the other day. My rather liberal mother is staunch on one rule in life - never live with someone until you are married. Her reasonings are that classic "Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?" idiom and that it just makes things 10x more difficult if things go south.
I understand those points of views but think it's a good idea to live with each other before marriage because understanding whether you can live well together is a BIG part of having a successful marriage. I would perhaps open up her rule to "never live with someone until you're engaged (or soon to be engaged)." Or I would say that living together (in a rental situation) before marriage is fine, but you shouldn't buy property together yet.
What are your opinions?
I have a better idea: Live 6 months with his parents.
Then turn around and try to understand his family of origin, the role-model his father was, the type of mother his mother was, how they ran their family/split responsibilities, how well they communicated (or not), and then assume that will be your BF's baseline. Horrified? Excited?
Good plan. And after those 6 months are up, you and he can live 6 months with your parents. It'll be fun!
Anonymous wrote:I’m also super liberal and agree 100% with your mom but not for that dumb ass reason. I’d go down a notch and say don’t live together until you’re ENGAGED. That way both parties are on the same page about the future of the relationship but if it turns out your partner is actually a nightmare to live with and you want out, it’s logistically easier than getting a divorce.
Anonymous wrote:Almost never works out for the women I know.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn't it kind of sad to believe that the "love of your life," aka the guy that you're going to marry, is of the sort of character who wouldn't marry you if you guys lived together first, because he got "free milk?"
I mean, if the guy is like that, wouldn't you want to find out before you marry him? No?
I bet it's real fun living with someone while constantly being marriage-tested in everything you say or do. Sounds like a really healthy game.
Some cows just need a good daily milking.....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn't it kind of sad to believe that the "love of your life," aka the guy that you're going to marry, is of the sort of character who wouldn't marry you if you guys lived together first, because he got "free milk?"
I mean, if the guy is like that, wouldn't you want to find out before you marry him? No?
I bet it's real fun living with someone while constantly being marriage-tested in everything you say or do. Sounds like a really healthy game.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn't it kind of sad to believe that the "love of your life," aka the guy that you're going to marry, is of the sort of character who wouldn't marry you if you guys lived together first, because he got "free milk?"
I mean, if the guy is like that, wouldn't you want to find out before you marry him? No?
I bet it's real fun living with someone while constantly being marriage-tested in everything you say or do. Sounds like a really healthy game.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just curious as it came up in conversation the other day. My rather liberal mother is staunch on one rule in life - never live with someone until you are married. Her reasonings are that classic "Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?" idiom and that it just makes things 10x more difficult if things go south.
I understand those points of views but think it's a good idea to live with each other before marriage because understanding whether you can live well together is a BIG part of having a successful marriage. I would perhaps open up her rule to "never live with someone until you're engaged (or soon to be engaged)." Or I would say that living together (in a rental situation) before marriage is fine, but you shouldn't buy property together yet.
What are your opinions?
I have a better idea: Live 6 months with his parents.
Then turn around and try to understand his family of origin, the role-model his father was, the type of mother his mother was, how they ran their family/split responsibilities, how well they communicated (or not), and then assume that will be your BF's baseline. Horrified? Excited?