Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stone has been a lying sleaze bag since his college days in DC. He was a Nixon RNC trickster.

FBI arrested Stone.

NBC reports that they also issued summonses to twelve of his associates to appear before the Grand Jury.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is the collusion? No collusion?

Are they all process crimes, again?

I’m unfamiliar with this “process crimes” term that you use.

Process crimes.... crimes that only exist because of the investigation itself.

There may be more low level indictments, but I think Bob Mueller is getting closer to the top.

Process crimes is exactly what was said on Fox and Friends this morning. As though there’s nothing to see here. For those of you who still don’t believe Fox is in Trump’s pocket, pay attention. I flip on Fox for a few minutes each morning to see how they are covering these stories and it’s mind boggling.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is the collusion? No collusion?

Are they all process crimes, again?

I’m unfamiliar with this “process crimes” term that you use.

It's a made up term by Trump supporters to create the impression that these aren't "real" crimes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is the collusion? No collusion?

Are they all process crimes, again?

Assange-STONE informed senior Trump Campaign officials that he had information indicating Organization 1 had documents whose release would be damaging to the Clinton Campaign. The head of Organization 1 was located at all relevant times at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London


Stone was the link between Turmp-Pence16 and Wikileaks.

Who do you suppose the Organization1 contacts might be?

And who is the “senior Trump campaign official” that’s implicated in directly colluding with Wikileaks via Roger Stone?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is the collusion? No collusion?

Are they all process crimes, again?

I’m unfamiliar with this “process crimes” term that you use.

Crime is crime. Crime about crime is still crime. Trump 2016 was one big crime.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is the collusion? No collusion?

Are they all process crimes, again?

Assange-STONE informed senior Trump Campaign officials that he had information indicating Organization 1 had documents whose release would be damaging to the Clinton Campaign. The head of Organization 1 was located at all relevant times at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London


Stone was the link between Turmp-Pence16 and Wikileaks.

Who do you suppose the Organization1 contacts might be?

And who is the “senior Trump campaign official” that’s implicated in directly colluding with Wikileaks via Roger Stone?

Anonymous wrote:Where is the collusion? No collusion?

Are they all process crimes, again?

I’m unfamiliar with this “process crimes” term that you use.

Anonymous wrote:Where is the collusion? No collusion?

Are they all process crimes, again?

Assange-STONE informed senior Trump Campaign officials that he had information indicating Organization 1 had documents whose release would be damaging to the Clinton Campaign. The head of Organization 1 was located at all relevant times at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London


Stone was the link between Turmp-Pence16 and Wikileaks.

Who do you suppose the Organization1 contacts might be?

Anonymous wrote:Where is the collusion? No collusion?

Are they all process crimes, again?

Read the indictment. Here I'll help:

Stone “was contacted by senior Trump campaign officials to inquire about future releases” of stolen information by Wikileaks

Anonymous wrote:Stone has been a lying sleaze bag since his college days in DC. He was a Nixon RNC trickster.

FBI arrested Stone.

Anonymous wrote:Where is the collusion? No collusion?

Are they all process crimes, again?

Why is he tampering with witnesses? What is he trying to cover up?

Duh. You all keep up with this but don't examine precedent of how these types of cases are unrolled.

He’s been arrested

Where is the collusion? No collusion?

Are they all process crimes, again?