Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since they think you need to be near a large population of Spanish speakers for immersion, I also don't think you will be able to get a reversal on Henry being an option ekementary school.
So how about:
1. Henry-- Montessor or Ats
2. Jamestown: Montessori or Ats
3. Ats: immersion
4. Carlie springs: immersion
5. Campbell or Claremont: el
The boundaries look largely the same-- is this lessening overcrowding?k
I really like this! Could we start rallying around this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since they think you need to be near a large population of Spanish speakers for immersion, I also don't think you will be able to get a reversal on Henry being an option ekementary school.
So how about:
1. Henry-- Montessor or Ats
2. Jamestown: Montessori or Ats
3. Ats: immersion
4. Carlie springs: immersion
5. Campbell or Claremont: el
The boundaries look largely the same-- is this lessening overcrowding?k
I really like this! Could we start rallying around this?
Anonymous wrote:Since they think you need to be near a large population of Spanish speakers for immersion, I also don't think you will be able to get a reversal on Henry being an option ekementary school.
So how about:
1. Henry-- Montessor or Ats
2. Jamestown: Montessori or Ats
3. Ats: immersion
4. Carlie springs: immersion
5. Campbell or Claremont: el
The boundaries look largely the same-- is this lessening overcrowding?k
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Confused. I thought Nottingham was at capacity with its art carts etc. How can it take all the Tuckahoe-Nottingham zone walkers?
Nottingham is also going to lose Planning Unit 16070 to Reed- that's the one south of Lee Highway that is in the Reed walk zone. That's a pretty densely populated planning unit-- the APS heat map colors it in the 71-93 student category.
Nottingham only has 2 small buses. There is no way 71-93 kids are picked up in 16070.
This poor planning unit already got shifted from Tuckahoe to Nottingham and now they are at risk of going back to Tuckahoe -I would be loosing my mind if I were these parents...
They aren’t going back to Tuckahoe. They would go to Reed in 2021. Still way too much movement for a single planning unit, but we all know APS could care less.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Confused. I thought Nottingham was at capacity with its art carts etc. How can it take all the Tuckahoe-Nottingham zone walkers?
Nottingham is also going to lose Planning Unit 16070 to Reed- that's the one south of Lee Highway that is in the Reed walk zone. That's a pretty densely populated planning unit-- the APS heat map colors it in the 71-93 student category.
Nottingham only has 2 small buses. There is no way 71-93 kids are picked up in 16070.
This poor planning unit already got shifted from Tuckahoe to Nottingham and now they are at risk of going back to Tuckahoe -I would be loosing my mind if I were these parents...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Confused. I thought Nottingham was at capacity with its art carts etc. How can it take all the Tuckahoe-Nottingham zone walkers?
Nottingham is also going to lose Planning Unit 16070 to Reed- that's the one south of Lee Highway that is in the Reed walk zone. That's a pretty densely populated planning unit-- the APS heat map colors it in the 71-93 student category.
Nottingham only has 2 small buses. There is no way 71-93 kids are picked up in 16070.