Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She strikes me as very... calculated... I just don’t get a good vibe from her.

+1 And I don't get the Meghan is beautiful schtick at all. She's very average, especially by Hollywood standards.

+2
Just not feeling it from her.

It’s good for her that Prince Harry disagrees with you. He thinks that she is gorgeous, AND he put a ring on it.

How is a divorced actress going to be a royal. Thought there were standards to being a royal

I find it funny that certain posters insist both Markle and Middleton "schemed" to marry William and Harry. Under what conditions would these posters approve (not that anyone needs their approval) of a serious relationship/marriage for these guys? Is it even in the realm of their imagination that they simply met, fell in love, and got married?

Honestly, those of you who insist Kate "waited" and "schemed" and that Markle is "calculating" and "shrewd" are beyond weird. Are these people not allowed to simply marry those they love?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let me summarize your post OP. She’s gorgeous, rich and famous. You’re not.

The end.

The sequel: she is also marrying a prince and you're not.

That above all is what is bugging everyone. As for racism claims, if he were marrying say, Emma Stone or Rachel McAdams wouldn't people be as nasty? Doubtful.

Do you really think that you are helping to alleviate racism when you randomly call someone who disagrees with you racist? Doesn’t it show that you are fixated on race when this is the first thing you go to? No one calls the obsessive Kate hater racist.

Sometimes we don’t like random celebrities. It’s not necessarily because of race.

+100
I like Markle, but totally agree with this. The morons crying, "Racist!" at every criticism of a minority, or "Sexist!" when someone criticizes a woman, are the reason this country is so divided. There are plenty of actors I dislike, both black and white. Their race is irrelevant.

Biotulin is awesome. Highly recommended if you haven’t already tried it

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let me summarize your post OP. She’s gorgeous, rich and famous. You’re not.

The end.

The sequel: she is also marrying a prince and you're not.

That above all is what is bugging everyone. As for racism claims, if he were marrying say, Emma Stone or Rachel McAdams wouldn't people be as nasty? Doubtful.

Do you really think that you are helping to alleviate racism when you randomly call someone who disagrees with you racist? Doesn’t it show that you are fixated on race when this is the first thing you go to? No one calls the obsessive Kate hater racist.

Sometimes we don’t like random celebrities. It’s not necessarily because of race.

Anonymous wrote:She truly seems like a terrible person. She denied knowing her half brother recently. I get that she has a screwed up family tree and has an incentive to distance herself, but gimme a break.

I think she's manipulative and calculated. I think she knew what buttons to push with Harry and hooked him. I hope she doesn't break his heart. She truly seems like the epitome of a gold digger.b

Let me guess. You're the Kate hater too. You simply hate any woman who has things you do not, and you want to paint them in the worst light possible. Instead, you're only making yourself look worse and worse.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She strikes me as very... calculated... I just don’t get a good vibe from her.

+1 And I don't get the Meghan is beautiful schtick at all. She's very average, especially by Hollywood standards.

+2
Just not feeling it from her.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let me summarize your post OP. She’s gorgeous, rich and famous. You’re not.

The end.

The sequel: she is also marrying a prince and you're not.

That above all is what is bugging everyone. As for racism claims, if he were marrying say, Emma Stone or Rachel McAdams wouldn't people be as nasty? Doubtful.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan = the flashy, glamorous side of the Royal family

Kate = the formal, maternal figure of the Royal family

These are their future roles once the current Queen dies. Meghan is going to do the press and public appearance stuff to take the pressure off Kate. Meanwhile, Kate is going to be devoted to ensuring the success of the future Kings (William and George).

Yea, I guess when I see it I think "Kate would never do a cover like that."

Not that Meaghan doesn't look beautiful.

Agreed. Kate would NEVER. Meaghan isn't beautiful under the best of circumstances, but here she looks tacky, if not trashy.

Kate wouldn't what? Like say prance down a runway half naked to get Will's attention ? No way! Oh wait...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jesus Mary and Joseph, people, she didn't pose for this cover. Those are all old photos of her, the "article" is a compilation of quotes she's given over the years in interviews and extrapolations as to how she MIGHT be prepping for the wedding. As a PP said, this is all one big nothingburger. She is no more involved in this magazine cover than Kate is when People puts her on the cover.

This is basically every person who will insist on commenting about how tacky this cover is for the next 10 pages of this thread.

Popcorn time.

Anonymous wrote:It’s started: She’s going the way of Fergie already.

Why else would they invite Fergie to the wedding when Wills and Kates snubbed her for their wedding.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She strikes me as very... calculated... I just don’t get a good vibe from her.

Again with the barely concealed racism? This is so tedious and tacky.

DP, but I didn't know she was biracial until recently. I thought she was white.

But I’m sure that you knew she was biracial when you posted your racist comment here. Prince Harry is marrying a divorced biracial woman...whether you like it or not.

What was racist about PP's comment? Simply the fact that PP thought she was calculating? Really? That makes her racist? Wow...

Anonymous wrote:She strikes me as very... calculated... I just don’t get a good vibe from her.

+1 And I don't get the Meghan is beautiful schtick at all. She's very average, especially by Hollywood standards.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jesus Mary and Joseph, people, she didn't pose for this cover. Those are all old photos of her, the "article" is a compilation of quotes she's given over the years in interviews and extrapolations as to how she MIGHT be prepping for the wedding. As a PP said, this is all one big nothingburger. She is no more involved in this magazine cover than Kate is when People puts her on the cover.

This is basically every person who will insist on commenting about how tacky this cover is for the next 10 pages of this thread.

Ain't that the truth. I swear, I could have a more productive conversation with my dog than with some of these posters.