Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whoever posted the Schev link. Thanks!
Looking at the salary data (median), Tech and GMU are pretty impressive. W&M is surprisingly at the bottom of the pile.
Bachelors degree -
18 months after graduation - UVA - $42K. Tech and GMU - $40/$39K.
5 years after graduation - Tech - 60K; UVA/GMU - 60K
Master's degree - GMU leads for both 18 months after and 5 years after - $58K/74K
Overall all three - GMU, UVA and Tech seem to do well in salaries. W&M is far behind on most categories. Surprised!!
Are GMU salaries for the master's programs higher because of the cohort (already employed folks supplementing their skillsets as opposed to full-time students at UVA/Tech)? Also shouldn't we be looking at mean salaries as opposed to median? Something is not right with this data.
I think the data says otherwise.Anonymous wrote:Whoever posted the Schev link. Thanks!
Looking at the salary data (median), Tech and GMU are pretty impressive. W&M is surprisingly at the bottom of the pile.
Bachelors degree -
18 months after graduation - UVA - $42K. Tech and GMU - $40/$39K.
5 years after graduation - Tech - 60K; UVA/GMU - 60K
Master's degree - GMU leads for both 18 months after and 5 years after - $58K/74K
Overall all three - GMU, UVA and Tech seem to do well in salaries. W&M is far behind on most categories. Surprised!!
Anonymous wrote:Well, I'll try and remember to post back once DD hears from them. She is below average in both her GPA and her test score so if she gets in, it will provide hope for everyone else out there with kids w/no national award(s), no perfect test score and all A+ on their report cards. It truly is a Race to Nowhere.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When we dropped our kid off at W&M a couple of years back, in his welcome talk the college president noted how few of the incoming freshman had perfect GPAs -it was a very very small number. So the class was not made up only of straight A students.
Very encouraging - thank you for posting!
Anonymous wrote:I wish I could see stats comparisons within individual counties.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Well, NOVA for 2 years and then transfer is the way to go if your DC is from this area then and not in the range of the SHEVE report posted above - sounds much more tenable and less stress inducing.
Well, it may be tenable, but students who have the stats to have a reasonable chance of acceptance at W&M are probably not going to want to attend NOVA with the C students from their HS while their friends go off to four-year colleges. If their parents can afford W&M, they can probably afford decent OOS schools where those same stats were qualify the student for scholarships. A kid would have to be really fixated on W&M to want to go to NOVA rather than just letting it go and finding a good fit elsewhere for the same price (or less).
I have yet to come across a single person whose kid actually did the transfer to W&M after two years.
If $$ is a concern, kid can go to a lesser VA school, like Mason, and transfer to the flagship if after a year they are still pining for it.
Anonymous wrote:
Well, NOVA for 2 years and then transfer is the way to go if your DC is from this area then and not in the range of the SHEVE report posted above - sounds much more tenable and less stress inducing.
Well, it may be tenable, but students who have the stats to have a reasonable chance of acceptance at W&M are probably not going to want to attend NOVA with the C students from their HS while their friends go off to four-year colleges. If their parents can afford W&M, they can probably afford decent OOS schools where those same stats were qualify the student for scholarships. A kid would have to be really fixated on W&M to want to go to NOVA rather than just letting it go and finding a good fit elsewhere for the same price (or less).
I have yet to come across a single person whose kid actually did the transfer to W&M after two years.
Well, NOVA for 2 years and then transfer is the way to go if your DC is from this area then and not in the range of the SHEVE report posted above - sounds much more tenable and less stress inducing.
Anonymous wrote:I wish I could see stats comparisons within individual counties.