Anonymous wrote:DW and I disagree somewhat on the priority of saving for college. I think it's last priority after retirement savings and making sure we have a decent emergency cushion.
HHI is about $280/yr. 3 year old and 6 year old in public school. $650K mortgage. About $600K in 401ks, $60K in liquid/emergency funds. Only other debt is about $20K in student loans that are very low rate (2%) that will be done in a few more years.
The debate is: should we be aspiring to cover all of those future college costs? Where we've settled for the time being is 50% of out of state tuition for both kids - which equates to $750/month right now. Planning to increase that by about 2-3% a year going forward. We can't predict now what kind of scholarships or grants kids may be eligible for, and innumerable college calculators have given us pretty different answers, so 50% seemed an OK compromise.
What is everyone trying to get done? 100% coverage for college for their kids? Private university rates with inflation? Out of state public tuition?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DH wants to cover 100%, I think 33% from us, 33% from the kid, 34% from scholarships is reasonable. Honestly loans aren't the worst thing that can happen to a kid and I think knowing going in that they have to pay for part of it will make them think longer and harder about public vs private, what major they want to pick and what their first job out of college will pay, the works.
I've told him that even if we hit the Powerball I'd stick to this plan, and then just pay off their loans as a graduation present. I really think having a kid be personally invested in their college education on the financial side makes them take it more seriously.
Maybe so in old days when cost was under control. With COA of 25k (instate public) to 70k (private) per year, there's no way kids can contribute in a meaningful way. Don't rely on that approach. It's a really outdated thinking.
I don't know. I think if kids are contributing (through loans) about $5-10k per year, it's meaningful for them without crushing their future with burdensome loan costs. Our plan is to fully cover in-state public. But if kids wanna go to private, I think they're gonna have to finance something like $7.5k per year. They should understand that it costs a lot more to go private.
They cannot take out student loans for $7,500 per year Until they were junior and senior years. The federal limit is $5500 the first year and $6500 the following year.
For anything beyond those amounts, you would need to take out a parent PLUS loan.
Neat. That doesn't really affect my post or my plans though. As I said, if my kids go private, they're gonna have to finance something like $7.5k per year. So, maybe they'll do $5500 in their own student loans, and cover the other $2k in some other way.
That's a reasonable amount but what is your assumption on how much your kids' private will cost?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DH wants to cover 100%, I think 33% from us, 33% from the kid, 34% from scholarships is reasonable. Honestly loans aren't the worst thing that can happen to a kid and I think knowing going in that they have to pay for part of it will make them think longer and harder about public vs private, what major they want to pick and what their first job out of college will pay, the works.
I've told him that even if we hit the Powerball I'd stick to this plan, and then just pay off their loans as a graduation present. I really think having a kid be personally invested in their college education on the financial side makes them take it more seriously.
Maybe so in old days when cost was under control. With COA of 25k (instate public) to 70k (private) per year, there's no way kids can contribute in a meaningful way. Don't rely on that approach. It's a really outdated thinking.
I don't know. I think if kids are contributing (through loans) about $5-10k per year, it's meaningful for them without crushing their future with burdensome loan costs. Our plan is to fully cover in-state public. But if kids wanna go to private, I think they're gonna have to finance something like $7.5k per year. They should understand that it costs a lot more to go private.
They cannot take out student loans for $7,500 per year Until they were junior and senior years. The federal limit is $5500 the first year and $6500 the following year.
For anything beyond those amounts, you would need to take out a parent PLUS loan.
Neat. That doesn't really affect my post or my plans though. As I said, if my kids go private, they're gonna have to finance something like $7.5k per year. So, maybe they'll do $5500 in their own student loans, and cover the other $2k in some other way.
Anonymous wrote:The vast vast majority of private colleges are no better than their public counterparts. There are some exceptions to this but not many. We are funding 100% of an instate 4 year program. Also planning to fund 50% of grad school if we deem it practical. (Not paying for MA in East Asian art history for example.)
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Thanks for responses, everyone. Interesting to see that the amount of uncertainty in this makes it hard for most to really feel confident about their planning (so we're not alone).
My philosophy has been that if we can get a good amount of it covered, that there are other avenues available to make up shortfalls (private loans, paying out of pocket, etc). I saw my sister get into her #1 private liberal arts college and then not get the financial aid she needed. It was pretty devastating for her as well as my middle class parents. She went to her #2 school, and has a very successful career now. I opted for the ROTC path and got a full ride and felt pretty good about not putting myself or my parents into any kind of debt - but I don't want to make my kids do that unless it's something they decide on their own. I wound up taking some small loans for grad school, which I'm still paying - but they're not much of a burden.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DH wants to cover 100%, I think 33% from us, 33% from the kid, 34% from scholarships is reasonable. Honestly loans aren't the worst thing that can happen to a kid and I think knowing going in that they have to pay for part of it will make them think longer and harder about public vs private, what major they want to pick and what their first job out of college will pay, the works.
I've told him that even if we hit the Powerball I'd stick to this plan, and then just pay off their loans as a graduation present. I really think having a kid be personally invested in their college education on the financial side makes them take it more seriously.
Maybe so in old days when cost was under control. With COA of 25k (instate public) to 70k (private) per year, there's no way kids can contribute in a meaningful way. Don't rely on that approach. It's a really outdated thinking.
I don't know. I think if kids are contributing (through loans) about $5-10k per year, it's meaningful for them without crushing their future with burdensome loan costs. Our plan is to fully cover in-state public. But if kids wanna go to private, I think they're gonna have to finance something like $7.5k per year. They should understand that it costs a lot more to go private.
They cannot take out student loans for $7,500 per year Until they were junior and senior years. The federal limit is $5500 the first year and $6500 the following year.
For anything beyond those amounts, you would need to take out a parent PLUS loan.