NathanBacaABC7 wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bets on which school is next to have this “breaking news”? Dunbar would be my best guess.
I'm hearing the same. I'll report on any documents I get in the future.
NathanBacaABC7 wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bets on which school is next to have this “breaking news”? Dunbar would be my best guess.
I'm hearing the same. I'll report on any documents I get in the future.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s hardly news that a diploma from DCPS means nothing. Whether it’s Ballou, CHEC, or Wilson, it just means a student spent some indeterminate amount of time in a teenage day care cente[i][u]r.
Turns out it doesn't even mean that much.
Anonymous wrote:Anacostia HS records should also be examined. Truancy there is extreme. The school cannot be expected to deal with it on their own as kids are coming from extreme situations. City and schools need to work together. Vocational Ed in DCPS has been completely gutted so Kids who are not interested in going to college or don’t have the resources end up completely disconnecting from school as DCPS has nothing to offer them.
Anonymous wrote:It’s hardly news that a diploma from DCPS means nothing. Whether it’s Ballou, CHEC, or Wilson, it just means a student spent some indeterminate amount of time in a teenage day care cente[i][u]r.
NathanBacaABC7 wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are there not truancy laws? Why aren’t kids and their parents reported after the max number of absences?
There are truancy laws. DC Code states after around 15 unexcused absences -- I don't have the exact number in front of me -- kids and their families are supposed to be referred to child protective services and the Attorney General's Office for scrutiny. We have records that indicate that rarely happens, despite students racking up those numbers of unexcused absences.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NathanBacaABC7 wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are there not truancy laws? Why aren’t kids and their parents reported after the max number of absences?
There are truancy laws. DC Code states after around 15 unexcused absences -- I don't have the exact number in front of me -- kids and their families are supposed to be referred to child protective services and the Attorney General's Office for scrutiny. We have records that indicate that rarely happens, despite students racking up those numbers of unexcused absences.
And yet it does happen in cases that make headlines for how crazy it is that parents were referred, like the Mom who took her child on a trip to pick up an adopted baby, and the Deal music prodigy who missed school for performances.
I work at a school where we regularly report AND NOTHING HAPPENS! The reports aren't because kids are on educational trips or other important family outings. They are simply truant day in and day out, over an entire school year and usually in the past years too. Seriously, there are so many agencies that need to be reviewed -- from the places that don't report, to what happens once a report is made, and what happens when reports are made multiple times for the same families over and over.
I've been in DC a long time. Remember Banita Jacks? Relisha Rudd? Let's stop worrying about the kids who missed school because their parents have the wherewithal (and the resources) to keep them out of school for a few days for a family trip and can document it. Some of these kids are missing from school for horrific reasons - like abuse and neglect. That alone should make DC take all reports seriously and follow every one of them up.
Even if the issue isn't child abuse, educational neglect is serious. Whether it's perpetrated by a system that gives kids grades they haven't earned for coursework they haven't mastered or perpetrated by families whose kids miss months of the school year without consequence.
NathanBacaABC7 wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are there not truancy laws? Why aren’t kids and their parents reported after the max number of absences?
There are truancy laws. DC Code states after around 15 unexcused absences -- I don't have the exact number in front of me -- kids and their families are supposed to be referred to child protective services and the Attorney General's Office for scrutiny. We have records that indicate that rarely happens, despite students racking up those numbers of unexcused absences.
Anonymous wrote:NathanBacaABC7 wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are there not truancy laws? Why aren’t kids and their parents reported after the max number of absences?
There are truancy laws. DC Code states after around 15 unexcused absences -- I don't have the exact number in front of me -- kids and their families are supposed to be referred to child protective services and the Attorney General's Office for scrutiny. We have records that indicate that rarely happens, despite students racking up those numbers of unexcused absences.
And yet it does happen in cases that make headlines for how crazy it is that parents were referred, like the Mom who took her child on a trip to pick up an adopted baby, and the Deal music prodigy who missed school for performances.
NathanBacaABC7 wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are there not truancy laws? Why aren’t kids and their parents reported after the max number of absences?
There are truancy laws. DC Code states after around 15 unexcused absences -- I don't have the exact number in front of me -- kids and their families are supposed to be referred to child protective services and the Attorney General's Office for scrutiny. We have records that indicate that rarely happens, despite students racking up those numbers of unexcused absences.
Anonymous wrote:Bets on which school is next to have this “breaking news”? Dunbar would be my best guess.
Anonymous wrote:Are there not truancy laws? Why aren’t kids and their parents reported after the max number of absences?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A few union heroes but a system full of people not complying with the law, right? Like a couple complainers vs probably hundreds who knew the law and didn’t obey? If the union made its grievance years ago and the Ballou or CHEC stories wasn’t actual news to Grosso or the public point me to a public source dated 2016 or earlier.
The attendance policy, grading changes and related makeup policies were only changed in the last 3 years.
Before that the graduation rate was lower.
The policies changed to make it harder to fail students—and lo and behold the graduation rate went up.
I like how everyone thinks administration or central office actually listens to teacher's signaling there are schools not complying with attendance rules. I have a friend who used to work in central office and is now a teacher and he expressly commented on how he was listened to and his comments were taken seriously as a central office admin but now that he's a teacher no one cares what he has to say.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A few union heroes but a system full of people not complying with the law, right? Like a couple complainers vs probably hundreds who knew the law and didn’t obey? If the union made its grievance years ago and the Ballou or CHEC stories wasn’t actual news to Grosso or the public point me to a public source dated 2016 or earlier.
The attendance policy, grading changes and related makeup policies were only changed in the last 3 years.
Before that the graduation rate was lower.
The policies changed to make it harder to fail students—and lo and behold the graduation rate went up.