Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is far more common than you think,OP. Look at the white house for an example. That said, if it's not ok for you, move on.
Melania is not a sugar baby, idiot. Or if she is then every woman on DCUM married to a high-income man is actually a whore.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:would you rather the party girl who slept with 30 guys and got nothing for it but an std?
Just asking.
There’s sooooo much more in between those two extremes it’s not even funny.
OP, I’m a huge believer in what happens before me is none of my business in terms of body count. All I need to know if any STDs or babies came from your past.
When it comes to sugar babying or other sex work, however, it’s a different story. That’s not just sexual behavior. There’s a whole other mentality that comes with exchanging your body for money and using sex to extrapolate money from men. I’d tread very, very carefully here. That’s not a mentality that’s easily shaken and ends once you get the exact amount for your loans. As a trust fund baby-friend she could’ve petitioned for a loan that was paid back over time. That she’d opt to have sex for money says A LOT.
What happens if you fall on hard times while married?
That's easy!
? He needed money so he put her on the street ?
Anonymous wrote:OP, you're a hypocrite. There's no supply without demand, so please look at your fellow male species members who perpetuate the sex trade.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:On the plus side, if she ever tries to deny you sex, all you have to do is throw $200 at her and say, "Get naked, sugar!"
Utterly disgusting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Wow! So much hate for the woman! You guys are putting too much emphasis on the fact that she slept with somebody and benefited from it. If a man could do the same he would; would you judge him equally? Big picture per OP she only slept about five guys. What the OP needs to focus on is the relationship and her. She was forthcoming and honest with him and he has to make a decision, can he accept her as she is or not. If he is wringing his hands so much, my thoughts are that he cannot. He needs to break up with her and move on and let her find somebody who can love her for who she is today
If men had an equal opportunity to sleep with women for money, the world would be such a radically different place, it's tough to say how any of us would judge a person's sexuality. A lot of hate for promiscuous women comes from resentment that women have so much more power in the sexual marketplace. If that structural imbalance went away, OP's girlfriend probably wouldn't be judged so harshly. But you might as well ask what would happen if we all lived on Big Rock Candy Mountain.
Anonymous wrote:You seem to very desperately to think this was just a FWB situation. But FWB don't pay to play.
Anonymous wrote:On the plus side, if she ever tries to deny you sex, all you have to do is throw $200 at her and say, "Get naked, sugar!"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, what's the difference between a woman who has a relationship with a rich man who gives her money and gifts, and a girl who has a relationship with a man who gives her money and gifts, and it's just established at the beginning that's what he's gonna do?
A sugar baby implies sugar daddy, meaning the man was old enough to be her father. The relationship was transactional.
When I was young, I lived at home with my parents during college. I worked a part time office job and paid my own way through school. I shared a car with my mother. I met and started dating my boyfriend in college, after we took classes together and knew each other as friends for a year. Our first date was to church for Ash Wednesday because I was a practicing Catholic. He was a sort of Catholic. He had money, and I did not. He drove. He picked me up. He paid for dates. He invited me on family vacations. We weren't even having more than make out sex for months. Do you see the difference? Yes, he had money. I did not. However, our relationship was in our way NOT based on money for sex.
Anonymous wrote:So, what's the difference between a woman who has a relationship with a rich man who gives her money and gifts, and a girl who has a relationship with a man who gives her money and gifts, and it's just established at the beginning that's what he's gonna do?
Anonymous wrote:OP, you're a hypocrite. There's no supply without demand, so please look at your fellow male species members who perpetuate the sex trade.
Anonymous wrote:So, what's the difference between a woman who has a relationship with a rich man who gives her money and gifts, and a girl who has a relationship with a man who gives her money and gifts, and it's just established at the beginning that's what he's gonna do?