Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I dare you to say that to the face of a single mother of 2 earning 50K for whom that extra $150 a month means the difference between being able to get to work and not. Would you do it? I bet you would, and I bet you would laugh at her, too, you Grinch.

People like you can't even fathom how difficult it is for a large sector of the American public, the working poor. Shame on you, especially in this supposed season of giving and charity.

We have so many single mothers as compared to the 50's and 60's. Why is that?


https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/10/how-americas-marriage-crisis-makes-income-inequality-so-much-worse/280056/






So many nasty thots everywhere.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Three fun facts:

There is not future in an America that is artificially "engineered" at every turn.


There's no point in working if everything is handed to you for free by someone else.

Every fortune cookie contains a fortune.

Fortune cookies don’t contain fortunes. They contain sayings or advice.

I’m going to go on the dole if I can get healthcare handed to me. Why should I work and take home nothing after bills? I can NOT work and not take home anything.

Agreed. Poverty is great! Highly recommended!

Wealth just buys a better address. The things I value - spending time with my family - have no cost but work costs me time. Time is worth more than money. I don’t want to spend all my time working, and I don’t need things anymore. I thought you guys hated wealth. I’d be poor in money but rich in the things that matter to me.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Three fun facts:

There is not future in an America that is artificially "engineered" at every turn.


There's no point in working if everything is handed to you for free by someone else.

Every fortune cookie contains a fortune.

Fortune cookies don’t contain fortunes. They contain sayings or advice.

I’m going to go on the dole if I can get healthcare handed to me. Why should I work and take home nothing after bills? I can NOT work and not take home anything.

Agreed. Poverty is great! Highly recommended!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Good. Why should taxpayers subsidize people's commutes? I've been working for 30 years and no employer ever gave me money to get to work. That was just part of the cost of having a job.

Hey, dumb dumb..because it is in everyone's best interest. It reduces the cost of metro commute which means there are ~700K fewer people on the roads.. which means you have a better commute when you drive to work.

Dont just jump research and then talk.

It cuts down on cats and thus pollution.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Good. Why should taxpayers subsidize people's commutes? I've been working for 30 years and no employer ever gave me money to get to work. That was just part of the cost of having a job.

Hey, dumb dumb..because it is in everyone's best interest. It reduces the cost of metro commute which means there are ~700K fewer people on the roads.. which means you have a better commute when you drive to work.

Dont just jump research and then talk.

What prevents you from paying for your own metro commute?

I have to buy my own gas. No one buys it for me. Why should someone else pay for your farecrard?

People using the metro helps keep gas prices lower. If people use metro less and drive more, that will create more of a demand on gas. The price of gas will then go up in reaction.

Anonymous wrote:

Good. Why should taxpayers subsidize people's commutes? I've been working for 30 years and no employer ever gave me money to get to work. That was just part of the cost of having a job.

Hey, dumb dumb..because it is in everyone's best interest. It reduces the cost of metro commute which means there are ~700K fewer people on the roads.. which means you have a better commute when you drive to work.

Dont just jump research and then talk.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Three fun facts:

There is not future in an America that is artificially "engineered" at every turn.


There's no point in working if everything is handed to you for free by someone else.

Every fortune cookie contains a fortune.

Fortune cookies don’t contain fortunes. They contain sayings or advice.

I’m going to go on the dole if I can get healthcare handed to me. Why should I work and take home nothing after bills? I can NOT work and not take home anything.

Anonymous wrote:Three fun facts:

There is not future in an America that is artificially "engineered" at every turn.


There's no point in working if everything is handed to you for free by someone else.

Every fortune cookie contains a fortune.

Anonymous wrote:The Rs are doing everything they can to rape the environment and my kid's future

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Good. Why should taxpayers subsidize people's commutes? I've been working for 30 years and no employer ever gave me money to get to work. That was just part of the cost of having a job.

Hey, dumb dumb..because it is in everyone's best interest. It reduces the cost of metro commute which means there are ~700K fewer people on the roads.. which means you have a better commute when you drive to work.

Dont just jump research and then talk.

What prevents you from paying for your own metro commute?

I have to buy my own gas. No one buys it for me. Why should someone else pay for your farecrard?

People using the metro helps keep gas prices lower. If people use metro less and drive more, that will create more of a demand on gas. The price of gas will then go up in reaction.

So by that logic, people driving more would result in fewer people using the metro, and then metro would be cheaper.

There's a big fixed cost component, so probably less than you would think. Bottom line is all these f'n subsidies need to go away. They're causing a ton of unintended consequences and damaging our economy.

Exactly. All roads should be tolled. People have gotten used to free government roads. Motorists need to pay their fair share. The gas tax doesn’t come close to paying for all these free roads.

Exactly- tolls on all roads

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Good. Why should taxpayers subsidize people's commutes? I've been working for 30 years and no employer ever gave me money to get to work. That was just part of the cost of having a job.

Hey, dumb dumb..because it is in everyone's best interest. It reduces the cost of metro commute which means there are ~700K fewer people on the roads.. which means you have a better commute when you drive to work.

Dont just jump research and then talk.

What prevents you from paying for your own metro commute?

I have to buy my own gas. No one buys it for me. Why should someone else pay for your farecrard?

People using the metro helps keep gas prices lower. If people use metro less and drive more, that will create more of a demand on gas. The price of gas will then go up in reaction.

So by that logic, people driving more would result in fewer people using the metro, and then metro would be cheaper.

There's a big fixed cost component, so probably less than you would think. Bottom line is all these f'n subsidies need to go away. They're causing a ton of unintended consequences and damaging our economy.

Exactly. All roads should be tolled. People have gotten used to free government roads. Motorists need to pay their fair share. The gas tax doesn’t come close to paying for all these free roads.