Anonymous wrote:2017 Survey - Staff Moral - % that Strongly Agreed or Agreed with Question 2: Staff morale is positive in this school. (this is the same measure used to order the high schools in the article)
1. Rosa Parks - 87.5%
2. Lakelands - 83.3%
3. Julius West - 83.1%
4. Cabin John - 82.4%
5. MLK - 73.9%
6. Takoma Park - 72.6%
7. Wood - 70.1%
8. Forest Oak - 67.3%
9. Rocky Hill - 66.1%
10. Tilden 65.7%
11. Frost - 65.3%
12. Farquar - 62.1%
13. Eastern - 61.5%
14. Key - 58.5%
15. Parkland - 56.2%
16. Pyle - 54.5%
17. Hallie Wells - 54%
18. Redland - 53.5%
19. North Bethesda - 52.2%
20. Westland - 50.6%
21. Argyle - 48.1%
22. Silver Spring - 45.7%
23. Kingsview - 42.8%
24. Briggs Chaney - 42.2%
25. Poole - 39.4%
26. White Oak - 38.3%
27. Sligo - 37.8%
28. Hoover - 37.7%
29. Lee - 36.8%
30. Loiderman - 35.9%
31. Newport Mill - 33.9%
32. Gaithersburg 28.6%
33. Banneker - 25.4%
34. Redland - 25%
35. Ridgeview - 25%
36. Baker 23.3%
37. Shady Grove - 20.5%
38. Neelsville - 15.5%
39. Clemente - 11.3%
40. Montgomery Village - 10.3%
Anonymous wrote:Interesting index. Also interesting: BCC is number 22 on the list and Einstein, much derided on DCUM, is 6.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree with that, and I am the poster who was surprised morale scores weren’t lower at my school. But even factoring all of that in, retention numbers tell a story. you won’t have a 20-30 percent staff turnover because of even all those positive factors combined. Personally, I think the supervisors at the level above principal should be walking the schools and talking to lay staff. Not just the admin. I don’t think I could even tell you who that person is, and I don’t think he’s talked to any of my colleagues either. Obviously people won’t complain to that person about their principal, but there are ways to get a sense of the land. Then they can give useful feedback to the principal. There will always be complainers who are never satisfied, but then there’s a whole bigger group of teachers who could give honest and fair assessments of how the school is functioning.
I agree. I’m 17:11 and my principal’s boss apparently loves visiting our school because my principal always has a big spread of food for the bigwigs. One of our preservice mornings is a breakfast where a lot of bigwigs are invited and principal hides out for days prepping for it. We’re stuck for two hours having to watch the brown nosing. Meanwhile no one understood the new arrival and dismissal procedures and principal wouldn’t respond to any emails about pressing issues related to the first week of school. But there were three kinds of French toast, so I guess that’s more important.
It’s the biggest crock of shit that the community sups are only dealing directly with the principals behind closed doors. My principal can put on a great show for those meetings and then go back to their MO of nepotism and being unresponsive.
Anonymous wrote:I agree with that, and I am the poster who was surprised morale scores weren’t lower at my school. But even factoring all of that in, retention numbers tell a story. you won’t have a 20-30 percent staff turnover because of even all those positive factors combined. Personally, I think the supervisors at the level above principal should be walking the schools and talking to lay staff. Not just the admin. I don’t think I could even tell you who that person is, and I don’t think he’s talked to any of my colleagues either. Obviously people won’t complain to that person about their principal, but there are ways to get a sense of the land. Then they can give useful feedback to the principal. There will always be complainers who are never satisfied, but then there’s a whole bigger group of teachers who could give honest and fair assessments of how the school is functioning.
Anonymous wrote:What they really should measure and share is staff retention. It might shock people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What they really should measure and share is staff retention. It might shock people.
My school has a miserable climate for staff, but I can't find another position in my specialty without a 45-60 minute commute and mine is currently 15 minutes.
I went online and looked at the climate survey for my school and it wasn't as bad as I would have thought but then I remembered one of the major reasons why the climate is bad---if you're on the principal's inner circle then the climate is awesome. There are around 10 people in this group who are close with the principal and they receive perks that others do not. They are held to a much lower standard as well and get away with things that others would be written up for in a heartbeat. It's not that large of a staff, so those ten people skewed the results of what it's like for the majority of staff members. There are also staff members who don't trust the anonymity of the survey and others who don't believe that anything will change, so they don't bother to fill it out.
Anonymous wrote:What they really should measure and share is staff retention. It might shock people.
Anonymous wrote:What they really should measure and share is staff retention. It might shock people.