Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My in laws still do that thing during holiday photo time where the children’s spouses have to step out of the frame for some of the pictures, so that it is just the grandparents’ blood relatives (never mind that grandma and grandpa aren’t actually blood relatives). All spouses have been married for at least 15 years.
So I don’t get too comfortable- I know what lies beneath.
That’s like every photo in my ILs homes: just them, their sons and their grandchildren.
Meanwhile my parents put up our family of four and my brothers family of four.
I swear, if an outsider visited the ILs house they’d assume the adult sons were widowed or divorced...
Whats wrong with parents wanting a picturing with their own kids? They were a nuclear family originally and why spouses etc should be included in some pics, I see nothing wrong with leaving them out of others
They gained a DIL. She is part of their family now. It's abusive to leave an inlaw off.
Anonymous wrote:This thread is reminding me that I need to get pot gummies from my best friend in order to tolerate my inlaw trip over thanksgiving! They're all fine individually, but I can't handle the dysfunction when they're all together!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m currently engaged. My future in-laws have a vacation home outside the country, where the typically go twice a year for several weeks at a time. Since we began dating 3 years ago, MIL made clear that I wouldn’t be invited. She still expects my fiancé to go multiple times a year for weeks at a time, leaving me behind. There’s no indication that her expectations are going to change after we get married.
This could be a blessing in disguise. You don’t have to spend time with your in-laws where you’re clearly not wanted anyway. You could go travel with friends or spend time working on creative projects.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m currently engaged. My future in-laws have a vacation home outside the country, where the typically go twice a year for several weeks at a time. Since we began dating 3 years ago, MIL made clear that I wouldn’t be invited. She still expects my fiancé to go multiple times a year for weeks at a time, leaving me behind. There’s no indication that her expectations are going to change after we get married.
This could be a blessing in disguise. You don’t have to spend time with your in-laws where you’re clearly not wanted anyway. You could go travel with friends or spend time working on creative projects.
Anonymous wrote:I’m currently engaged. My future in-laws have a vacation home outside the country, where the typically go twice a year for several weeks at a time. Since we began dating 3 years ago, MIL made clear that I wouldn’t be invited. She still expects my fiancé to go multiple times a year for weeks at a time, leaving me behind. There’s no indication that her expectations are going to change after we get married.
Anonymous wrote:Come on now, it's not "abusive" to leave an in-law out of a photo. Rude, sure, but that cheapens the meaning of abuse.