Anonymous wrote:Very different kids apply to UChicago vs Penn so I doubt there's any real contention there. The new UChicago vs Columbia...juries out on that one. My guess is that they'll end up head to head.

Anonymous wrote:All of the Chicago students from my DC's Big 3 class, were rejected from the Ivys.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Very different kids apply to UChicago vs Penn so I doubt there's any real contention there. The new UChicago vs Columbia...juries out on that one. My guess is that they'll end up head to head.
From my experience a good number applies to both, especially now that Chicago is trying to look more like an ivy. I know many who did Penn ED and Chicago EA. I agree though the overlap is much smaller compared to Columbia vs Chicago. I don't think it is going to be head to head. Colummbia.bia has the location, the (slightly) stronger name and the ivy league prestige. At least in DCs prep-school Columbia wins by far.
Anonymous wrote:I dont think it is that surprising if Chicago loses to HYP, loses slightly to Penn and Columbia and goes neck and neck or wins over Dartmouth, Brown, Cornell.
Anonymous wrote:Very different kids apply to UChicago vs Penn so I doubt there's any real contention there. The new UChicago vs Columbia...juries out on that one. My guess is that they'll end up head to head.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All of the Chicago students from my DC's Big 3 class, were rejected from the Ivys.
At our Big 3 they had HYP and lower Ivy acceptances in hand.
Anonymous wrote:All of the Chicago students from my DC's Big 3 class, were rejected from the Ivys.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does fun go to die at any Ivy? If so - where does it die first- chicago or the Ivy?
You've obviously seen the tee shirt.
Anonymous wrote:Chicago didn’t lie; you glossed over the qualifier in its statement. It said a higher percentage than any *university’s* college — LACs and specialized schools don’t fall into this category. That’s consistent with 3/4 of the rankings Reed presented. The most recent NSF data I could find isn’t consistent with either school’s claim (Rice edges Chicago by .1% for first in the university category) but it’s annual and limited to science PhDs granted in the US. So not directly commensurable. Without better sourcing, it’s hard to tell which school’s presentation is accurate — could be either, neither, or both.
I’m done with this discussion.