Anonymous wrote:I'm now as anti charter as they come, and while even 100% passing on PARCC wouldn't sway me, the percentages you posted OP are quite high in some cases. The average pass rate for the entire country is around 25%. So when you start getting towards 50% that's pretty high. That would indicate two things to me: high income levels and or total teaching to the test. I worked for a charter once upon a time and we ONLY taught reading writing and math. No science or social studies at all. For real. That's how we got better scores (as well as kicking out kids who were issues).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is CMI penalizes in tier ranking for having large numbers of SpEd students?
CMI's students with IEPs actually do pretty well on PARCC -- 24% proficient or advanced in ELA; 31% in math. That's about 10% lower than the overall school proficient/advanced rate, but far better than CMI does with economically disadvantaged students.
You can drill into it at http://results.osse.dc.gov/
Their special ed population has fallen below 30% so is on par with most other schools other than the language immersions who have much lower special needs percentages.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is CMI penalizes in tier ranking for having large numbers of SpEd students?
CMI's students with IEPs actually do pretty well on PARCC -- 24% proficient or advanced in ELA; 31% in math. That's about 10% lower than the overall school proficient/advanced rate, but far better than CMI does with economically disadvantaged students.
You can drill into it at http://results.osse.dc.gov/
Anonymous wrote:Is CMI penalizes in tier ranking for having large numbers of SpEd students?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Basis high school tier 1
Basis middle tier 2 - student attrition hurts
Not really. Attrition counts for 10% points for Basis middle. What really hurt them was their very, very poor growth (0.3 score out of 20.0 in ELA and 7.7 out of 20 for math). These are worth 20% each.
Could someone explain this metric to me? I sound dumb, but I don’t really get it or why it’s so important or how BASIS could only get .3 points out of 20!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Basis high school tier 1
Basis middle tier 2 - student attrition hurts
Not really. Attrition counts for 10% points for Basis middle. What really hurt them was their very, very poor growth (0.3 score out of 20.0 in ELA and 7.7 out of 20 for math). These are worth 20% each.
Could someone explain this metric to me? I sound dumb, but I don’t really get it or why it’s so important or how BASIS could only get .3 points out of 20!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Basis high school tier 1
Basis middle tier 2 - student attrition hurts
Not really. Attrition counts for 10% points for Basis middle. What really hurt them was their very, very poor growth (0.3 score out of 20.0 in ELA and 7.7 out of 20 for math). These are worth 20% each.
Anonymous wrote:Basis high school tier 1
Basis middle tier 2 - student attrition hurts