Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Depending on what your definition of sex is, I don't see how more than three at a time is physically possible.

You’re forgetting the hands, so it’s actually 5.

I caveated with depending on your definition is. After high school do handys count?

Anonymous wrote:If you are just sleeping around it does not matter.

If you want a relationship one at a time.

If you have a FWB you will not really be looking and you are obviously settling for less. It's not good to settle for less, you get comfortable with less.


I don't think I am explaining it well but if you really want to find a life partner it's not good to have a side piece.

Not true. Having a FWB actually helped me when dating. Kept me from getting serious with men who weren't great fits just to have companionship. I'd see FWB once a month and date other guys the rest of the time. Only slept with one guy at a time (stopped see FWB when having sex in a relationship). Totally took the pressure off of finding a guy to date.

I'm single again in my 40s and have had as many as three overlapping, which makes up for the years of my marriage when it was mostly zero.

I'd probably stick to one at a time. God forbid you accidentally end up pregnant and have to figure out whose it is! But over a lifetime? Totally your call.

Anonymous wrote:Depending on what your definition of sex is, I don't see how more than three at a time is physically possible.

You’re forgetting the hands, so it’s actually 5.