Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:U.MD has higher incoming SATs and ACTs than Wisconsin. Just being inside the nations capital beltway makes is less perochial.
I’d rather be with in-state MD kids than a bunch of in-state WI or MI farm kids
What's wrong with farm kids?
Having taught them, I would say "nothing at all, except they are more likely to have gone to a small rural school that didn't offer many advanced classes."
My experience was that they were hard working, self-starters. They showed up for office hours, did their work, and were nice to have around. They said please and thank you.
Sounds just like the kids inside the beltway, right?
Yeah - the farm kids are going to be way more well adjusted. Probably for life.
I asked DD if this school was on her list and she said 'no, because it's mostly white preppy kids playing on a lake?'
Thoughts?
Wisconsin alum here. I let out a huge laugh when I read this. Sorry, but your daughter has no idea what she is talking about. She might be confusing it with Northwestern.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem I see with UW is that the anti-intellectual attitude of the elected officials is destabilizing the University. Threatening to end tenure...reduced funding...
This will reduce the quality of the faculty. Of course, they will not defund the football team.
Agree with the first point.
They don't fund the football team. The UW athletic department has been operating in the black for decades and actually subsidizes the rest of the University; and they do things the right way, no bending of academic standards for the varsity athletes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:U.MD has higher incoming SATs and ACTs than Wisconsin. Just being inside the nations capital beltway makes is less perochial.
The word is provincial.![]()
And you spelled parochial incorrectly.![]()
I grew up in Madison and hear you can find beer there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:U.MD has higher incoming SATs and ACTs than Wisconsin. Just being inside the nations capital beltway makes is less perochial.
I’d rather be with in-state MD kids than a bunch of in-state WI or MI farm kids
What's wrong with farm kids?
Having taught them, I would say "nothing at all, except they are more likely to have gone to a small rural school that didn't offer many advanced classes."
My experience was that they were hard working, self-starters. They showed up for office hours, did their work, and were nice to have around. They said please and thank you.
Sounds just like the kids inside the beltway, right?
Yeah - the farm kids are going to be way more well adjusted. Probably for life.
I asked DD if this school was on her list and she said 'no, because it's mostly white preppy kids playing on a lake?'
Thoughts?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem I see with UW is that the anti-intellectual attitude of the elected officials is destabilizing the University. Threatening to end tenure...reduced funding...
This will reduce the quality of the faculty. Of course, they will not defund the football team.
Yup. As the parent of a high school senior applying to Madison, this is my primary concern - that the quality of the school will decline because of bad choices by state leaders.
The same can be said for virtually every state flagship. Their funding is down, and most tenured positions are being replaced with non-tenured ones. But the funding issue has been the case for at least 10-12 years now. So draw your own conclusions.
The state of Illinois says: Wisconsin, hold my beer.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-college-budget-crunch-met-20160331-story.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:U.MD has higher incoming SATs and ACTs than Wisconsin. Just being inside the nations capital beltway makes is less perochial.
I’d rather be with in-state MD kids than a bunch of in-state WI or MI farm kids
What's wrong with farm kids?
Having taught them, I would say "nothing at all, except they are more likely to have gone to a small rural school that didn't offer many advanced classes."
My experience was that they were hard working, self-starters. They showed up for office hours, did their work, and were nice to have around. They said please and thank you.
Sounds just like the kids inside the beltway, right?
Yeah - the farm kids are going to be way more well adjusted. Probably for life.
Anonymous wrote:The problem I see with UW is that the anti-intellectual attitude of the elected officials is destabilizing the University. Threatening to end tenure...reduced funding...
This will reduce the quality of the faculty. Of course, they will not defund the football team.
Anonymous wrote:7 months on campus
4 months of it arctic cold .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cold.
If his dream school is Michigan, pretty sure he doesn't mind the cold.
Michigan is cold, but not Wisconsin cold.
Madison native here...I think Michigan winters are worse
Anonymous wrote:Which one? There are a lot of schools in the system, Madison is not the center of the universe.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cold.
If his dream school is Michigan, pretty sure he doesn't mind the cold.
Michigan is cold, but not Wisconsin cold.
Madison native here...I think Michigan winters are worse
Michigan is on the snowy side of the lake, but I believe that Madison temps are a bit lower.
Anonymous wrote:U.MD has higher incoming SATs and ACTs than Wisconsin. Just being inside the nations capital beltway makes is less perochial.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem I see with UW is that the anti-intellectual attitude of the elected officials is destabilizing the University. Threatening to end tenure...reduced funding...
This will reduce the quality of the faculty. Of course, they will not defund the football team.
Yup. As the parent of a high school senior applying to Madison, this is my primary concern - that the quality of the school will decline because of bad choices by state leaders.