I think she replied, but since she can't quote, you wouldn't know that she replied to you.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do you post your responses above the quoted material instead of below it, as is the custom on DCUM?
Still waiting for an answer on this.
Anonymous wrote:Why do you post your responses above the quoted material instead of below it, as is the custom on DCUM?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good question Pp. There have been some crazy examples. We had a top CFO candidate come in sweating very badly. He turned out to be lying. We had a COO candidate blow his nose into his napkin at a fancy restaurant, and we had a CPO come in not remembering who she was meeting with. One of the worst was a candidate at a Four Seasons breakfast have a full convo on his cell during the breakfast. At the highest levels, we are not just looking for fit and experience but simple skills that define class.
If this is really your writing style, it's painfully obvious you aren't placing high-level execs. You aren't fooling anyone here.
Not op but come on, we don't always do our best here. I just wrote "to" instead of "too" and hope I'm forgiven bc I would never be that careless.
Anonymous wrote:I'm urban and walk everywhere. No car for me. But my DH has one.
Anonymous wrote:OP, what kind of car do you drive?
Anonymous wrote:Thanks pp and f/or the person who asked what kind of car I and my DH drive, why would that matter to you? I'm guessing you must be in a suburb.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good question Pp. There have been some crazy examples. We had a top CFO candidate come in sweating very badly. He turned out to be lying. We had a COO candidate blow his nose into his napkin at a fancy restaurant, and we had a CPO come in not remembering who she was meeting with. One of the worst was a candidate at a Four Seasons breakfast have a full convo on his cell during the breakfast. At the highest levels, we are not just looking for fit and experience but simple skills that define class.
If this is really your writing style, it's painfully obvious you aren't placing high-level execs. You aren't fooling anyone here.
Anonymous wrote:Good question Pp. There have been some crazy examples. We had a top CFO candidate come in sweating very badly. He turned out to be lying. We had a COO candidate blow his nose into his napkin at a fancy restaurant, and we had a CPO come in not remembering who she was meeting with. One of the worst was a candidate at a Four Seasons breakfast have a full convo on his cell during the breakfast. At the highest levels, we are not just looking for fit and experience but simple skills that define class.
Anonymous wrote:OP, what kind of car do you drive?
Anonymous wrote: 21:22-- some of my Clint's are Fortune 500, trade association and non-profit Clint's. Our general rate is 30-33 percent of the candidate's first year salary plus admin costs for the firm. And no, we don't put mediocre candidates forward. That would harm our business and reputation. We are an international firm and depend on repeat business.