Anonymous wrote:My oldest played football from kindergarten through his senior year in high school. I don't feel the need to "justify" it at all. In the many, many years he played, it literally never came up. He never had a serious injury. My youngest is a band kid. He was messing around with friends at band camp and broke his leg and tore his ACL. He is having his second surgery next week. His knee will likely never fully heal.
Life is dangerous.
Anonymous wrote:Time will tell with soccer and head injuries. And the lawsuits will follow. Just saying.
Anonymous wrote:The truth of the matter is that parents who have talented athletes have a hard time saying no to their passionate sons who LOVE the game and want to play so badly. I have a friend who said she would never let her son play, but it turns out he is supper talented at the game and now she is letting him do it.
Keep in mind there are pretty high concussion rates in other sports like hockey, lacrosse, wrestling.
Glad my honors student with a 4.1 GPA is not much of an athlete. His extra curriculars are more artistically based (theater, music, etc.), but he manages to get enough exercise to stay in shape playing rec sports and swimming in the summer. I feel bad for the jocks who have to rely on their sport to gain access to a good school.
Anonymous wrote:Dads who couldn't play football force their sons to play football. Sad - and dangerous.
Anonymous wrote:My oldest played football from kindergarten through his senior year in high school. I don't feel the need to "justify" it at all. In the many, many years he played, it literally never came up. He never had a serious injury. My youngest is a band kid. He was messing around with friends at band camp and broke his leg and tore his ACL. He is having his second surgery next week. His knee will likely never fully heal.
Life is dangerous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who are they justifying it to, and why?
No answer to this?
Who are the parents justifying their decisions to?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
If one of my kids gets a concussion, then yes after one I will reassess. If anyone lets their kid play after 2==they are idiots.
My son got his first concussion in 3rd grade, sports related.
His second in middle school, not sports related.
Both were fairly easy recoveries, a couple days missed school, a week of light duty, back to completely normal afterwards.
He's in high school, and he plays soccer.
Maybe I'm an idiot, but when I talk among my friends I know so many kids who have gotten concussions just from life. If the right thing to do is bench your kid after two concussions, that's a lot of kids who can't do anything anymore.
It's not easy. I have no idea if I'm making the right choice letting him play. I actually think he's safer doing his sports than the crazy horseplay that teen boys get up to. And his non-sports concussion was from simply not being fully aware of his surroundings, that happens to people all the time throughout their lives. There's really no way to protect against that.
Oh come on. I've no personal skin in this fight but do you REALLY believe this? I cannot believe it if you do.
Anonymous wrote:Who are they justifying it to, and why?
Anonymous wrote:My DC, who has only ever played non-contact sports, sustained 2 fairly mild concussions coincidentally over the span of 6 months for non-sport reasons. (he's clumsy!) They affected literally every aspect of his life and it took a good while before he felt completely normal again. It could have been much worse...I imagine him playing a high contact sport and facing repeated head hits/full-on concussions and shudder, and this made it more clear to me why I could never have supported him playing football.