Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's not to like? Spinners FTW

How does this spinning thing work?

Urban Dictionary will tell you. Let's just say they are short enough that you can spin em around and... basically do whatever...

Yeah... I looked it up. Doesn't sound good at all.

Seems like it sounds pretty damn good to most men. Myself included.

Ok. I'm glad I'm tall!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's not to like? Spinners FTW

How does this spinning thing work?

It doesn't. Dudes just like imagining how it would work and calling little women "spinners". It's just a guy thing.

Sure it does. All you need is a basket chair suspended from the ceiling by a rope. I had that in Hong Kong back in the 70's

Ok Gramps. Now go take your nap.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's not to like? Spinners FTW

How does this spinning thing work?

It doesn't. Dudes just like imagining how it would work and calling little women "spinners". It's just a guy thing.

Sure it does. All you need is a basket chair suspended from the ceiling by a rope. I had that in Hong Kong back in the 70's

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The really short ones are a lot more likely to get/look heavy in the middle-aged years.

A short chick with huge boobs will be awesome at 25 and grim at 45.

There's just less frame to hide the weight.

It's better than looking like a giant. But, to each their own. I just don't find it hot.

Tall women have nice long legs!

If this were the 1940s, that would be super exciting.

Huh? I bet you look like a troll, as well.

Awww, the giant is feeling triggered.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's not to like? Spinners FTW

How does this spinning thing work?

Urban Dictionary will tell you. Let's just say they are short enough that you can spin em around and... basically do whatever...

Yeah... I looked it up. Doesn't sound good at all.

Seems like it sounds pretty damn good to most men. Myself included.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The really short ones are a lot more likely to get/look heavy in the middle-aged years.

A short chick with huge boobs will be awesome at 25 and grim at 45.

There's just less frame to hide the weight.

It's better than looking like a giant. But, to each their own. I just don't find it hot.

Tall women have nice long legs!

Or long thick tree trunks. Tall doesn't mean fit.

Tree trunk legs vs. trolls.... legs for the win!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's not to like? Spinners FTW

How does this spinning thing work?

Urban Dictionary will tell you. Let's just say they are short enough that you can spin em around and... basically do whatever...

Yeah... I looked it up. Doesn't sound good at all.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The really short ones are a lot more likely to get/look heavy in the middle-aged years.

A short chick with huge boobs will be awesome at 25 and grim at 45.

There's just less frame to hide the weight.

It's better than looking like a giant. But, to each their own. I just don't find it hot.

Tall women have nice long legs!

If this were the 1940s, that would be super exciting.

Huh? I bet you look like a troll, as well.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The really short ones are a lot more likely to get/look heavy in the middle-aged years.

A short chick with huge boobs will be awesome at 25 and grim at 45.

There's just less frame to hide the weight.

It's better than looking like a giant. But, to each their own. I just don't find it hot.

Tall women have nice long legs!

Or long thick tree trunks. Tall doesn't mean fit.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's not to like? Spinners FTW

How does this spinning thing work?

Urban Dictionary will tell you. Let's just say they are short enough that you can spin em around and... basically do whatever...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's not to like? Spinners FTW

How does this spinning thing work?

It doesn't. Dudes just like imagining how it would work and calling little women "spinners". It's just a guy thing.

I'm 5'3" and married to a 6'1" man. We have a daughter who will be short like I am and a son who will be taller than DH. His mom is 4'11" (probably shorter by now!) and his dad was 6'2".

I dated a man who was 6'3" and he thought I was too short for him; he preferred taller women so there wasn't as much height imbalance.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The really short ones are a lot more likely to get/look heavy in the middle-aged years.

A short chick with huge boobs will be awesome at 25 and grim at 45.

There's just less frame to hide the weight.

It's better than looking like a giant. But, to each their own. I just don't find it hot.

Tall women have nice long legs!

If this were the 1940s, that would be super exciting.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The really short ones are a lot more likely to get/look heavy in the middle-aged years.

A short chick with huge boobs will be awesome at 25 and grim at 45.

There's just less frame to hide the weight.

It's better than looking like a giant. But, to each their own. I just don't find it hot.

Tall women have nice long legs!

Anonymous wrote:What's not to like? Spinners FTW

How does this spinning thing work?