Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:identity politics, GOP style.

Well, to be fair, Identity Politics was indeed started by liberals.


Check your status here:

- black or African
- white
- Asian
- Hispanic
- Native American
- two or more races
- other
- in love with a tree
- polyamorous
- bisexual ambidextrous
- pansexual wiccan
- still deciding
- Brony


Each day, without fail, my middle school daughter would share some story about how another kid in her class has either switched gender or had embraced some other "form." I can no longer keep up.

Anonymous wrote:Cal tech admissions model for all schools.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another waste of taxpayer money and another "oh, poor me" whine from the dumb whites.

Like "oh poor me" programs for Blacks? "Oh poor me my great great grandfather was a slave!"

Can you imagine if someone said another "poor me" complaint from the dumb blacks? I've has it with this reverse racism.

In English, please.

I thought it was clear, assuming you read the first PP. She made a derogatory remark about "the dumb whites," so I was demonstrating how unacceptable it would been to have said "the dumb blacks."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why should a black student who has a 3.3 gpa, 1200 sat and who comes from an upper middle class background and has good extracurriculars get into better schools than a white middle class student with a 3.6 gpa, 1300 sat and good extracurriculars? This is reality to many Affirmative action should be on family income not race.

Not that I think for a minute that 3.6 students are losing spots to 3.3 students. But the reality today is that black student will get 50% of the job interviews compared to a white student with the exact same resume, just a different name.

I worked in higher-ed admissions, and I will tell you that white 3.6 students did lose spots to black 3.3 students, with all other factors equal.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow.

So, all those people who were mad that they were called deplorables, are actually deplorable racists. Who knew?

Why are you assuming that the people pointing out that whites lose out to minorities (with lower grades and test scores) are Trump voters? I didn't vote for Trump, and I think it unfair that a white, Asian, or Jewish student from the same SES as blacks and Latinos lose their spots to those with significantly lower grades, based on race.

Anonymous wrote:Wow.

So, all those people who were mad that they were called deplorables, are actually deplorable racists. Who knew?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another waste of taxpayer money and another "oh, poor me" whine from the dumb whites.

Like "oh poor me" programs for Blacks? "Oh poor me my great great grandfather was a slave!"

Can you imagine if someone said another "poor me" complaint from the dumb blacks? I've has it with this reverse racism.

In English, please.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why should a black student who has a 3.3 gpa, 1200 sat and who comes from an upper middle class background and has good extracurriculars get into better schools than a white middle class student with a 3.6 gpa, 1300 sat and good extracurriculars? This is reality to many Affirmative action should be on family income not race.

Not that I think for a minute that 3.6 students are losing spots to 3.3 students. But the reality today is that black student will get 50% of the job interviews compared to a white student with the exact same resume, just a different name.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:identity politics, GOP style.

Well, to be fair, Identity Politics was indeed started by liberals.


Check your status here:

- black or African
- white
- Asian
- Hispanic
- Native American
- two or more races
- other
- in love with a tree
- polyamorous
- bisexual ambidextrous
- pansexual wiccan
- still deciding
- Brony


Each day, without fail, my middle school daughter would share some story about how another kid in her class has either switched gender or had embraced some other "form." I can no longer keep up.

Oh FFS. Yesterday's identity politics was slavery, a conservative behavior. Later, segregation was a conservative behavior. Today's self described "identitarians" are the alt-right.

We don't play identity politics. We just no longer tolerate bigotry.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another waste of taxpayer money and another "oh, poor me" whine from the dumb whites.

Like "oh poor me" programs for Blacks? "Oh poor me my great great grandfather was a slave!"

Can you imagine if someone said another "poor me" complaint from the dumb blacks? I've has it with this reverse racism.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another waste of taxpayer money and another "oh, poor me" whine from the dumb whites.

Like "oh poor me" programs for Blacks? "Oh poor me my great great grandfather was a slave!"

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:identity politics, GOP style.

Well, to be fair, Identity Politics was indeed started by liberals.


Check your status here:

- black or African
- white
- Asian
- Hispanic
- Native American
- two or more races
- other
- in love with a tree
- polyamorous
- bisexual ambidextrous
- pansexual wiccan
- still deciding
- Brony


Each day, without fail, my middle school daughter would share some story about how another kid in her class has either switched gender or had embraced some other "form." I can no longer keep up.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hasn't SCOTUS already decided on the constitutionality of affirmative action? So glad taxpayer funds will be going to what's *really* important.

Yes screw little Johnny who got s 1600 SAT. he needs to give up his seat to Harvard because racism, right?

To little Jamal who also got a 1600? Maybe.

But you know that government can't tell Harvard who to admit, I hope.