Anonymous wrote:Joe Biden always addressed his wife as Dr. Jill Biden and insisted others do the same even though her academic credentials peaked with her teaching one class at Northern Virginia Community College. Go figure.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My Ph.D wife always says: unless you're ready to say "yes" when someone yells "IS ANYONE ON THIS PLANE A DOCTOR?" then just don't.
"Why, does someone have a question about medieval French politics that needs immediate answering?"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So there's the idea that it's nice to call people what they prefer to be called... regardless of whether you think their title is undeserved, or doesn't deserve respect, or they're crazy to insist on it...
There's also the idea of not condescendingly correcting your colleague like a pompous ass.
It is not condescending or pompous to let your colleagues know what you prefer to be called.
It's like asking about and correctly using someone's designated pronoun in order to show respect for their identity, which I'm told the kids all do these days.
This isn't the same as saying, "Oh, I actually go by James instead of Jim" or "Actually I identify as a woman, please call me Karen". This is someone trying to assert superiority by having OP refer to her as "Dr. Smith" while she continues to call OP by her first name.
And as everyone else on this thread has pointed out, when PhDs do that, it is extremely comical.
Sure it is the same. Being a PhD is part of their identity - and obviously, a very important part to them, since they spent 6 to 10 years obtaining it.
It is not an assertion of superiority to ask someone to use the correct title that you prefer them to use.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So there's the idea that it's nice to call people what they prefer to be called... regardless of whether you think their title is undeserved, or doesn't deserve respect, or they're crazy to insist on it...
There's also the idea of not condescendingly correcting your colleague like a pompous ass.
It is not condescending or pompous to let your colleagues know what you prefer to be called.
It's like asking about and correctly using someone's designated pronoun in order to show respect for their identity, which I'm told the kids all do these days.
This isn't the same as saying, "Oh, I actually go by James instead of Jim" or "Actually I identify as a woman, please call me Karen". This is someone trying to assert superiority by having OP refer to her as "Dr. Smith" while she continues to call OP by her first name.
And as everyone else on this thread has pointed out, when PhDs do that, it is extremely comical.
Sure it is the same. Being a PhD is part of their identity - and obviously, a very important part to them, since they spent 6 to 10 years obtaining it.
It is not an assertion of superiority to ask someone to use the correct title that you prefer them to use.
Anonymous wrote:This is insane and ppl like this drive me nuts. When we got married, we sent DHs brother and SIL the invitation (both PhDs) addressed to Mr and Mrs. They returned the envelope with the mr and Mrs crossed out and replaced with "Drs." Needless to say, we aren't close.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So there's the idea that it's nice to call people what they prefer to be called... regardless of whether you think their title is undeserved, or doesn't deserve respect, or they're crazy to insist on it...
There's also the idea of not condescendingly correcting your colleague like a pompous ass.
It is not condescending or pompous to let your colleagues know what you prefer to be called.
It's like asking about and correctly using someone's designated pronoun in order to show respect for their identity, which I'm told the kids all do these days.
This isn't the same as saying, "Oh, I actually go by James instead of Jim" or "Actually I identify as a woman, please call me Karen". This is someone trying to assert superiority by having OP refer to her as "Dr. Smith" while she continues to call OP by her first name.
And as everyone else on this thread has pointed out, when PhDs do that, it is extremely comical.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What entails respect? Earning potential or the ability to excel/specialize in a field/ area of interest ? Acquiring a Phd reqyuires perseverance and passion for knowledge. I think that deserves respect. Being hung up on titles is a whole another thing
OP here. I'm a lawyer involved in litigation and am trying to get documents from her. I'm not saying a PhD is worthless by any stretch.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So there's the idea that it's nice to call people what they prefer to be called... regardless of whether you think their title is undeserved, or doesn't deserve respect, or they're crazy to insist on it...
There's also the idea of not condescendingly correcting your colleague like a pompous ass.
It is not condescending or pompous to let your colleagues know what you prefer to be called.
It's like asking about and correctly using someone's designated pronoun in order to show respect for their identity, which I'm told the kids all do these days.
Anonymous wrote:My Ph.D wife always says: unless you're ready to say "yes" when someone yells "IS ANYONE ON THIS PLANE A DOCTOR?" then just don't.
Got her Doctor Who tshirt that said "Not that kind of Doctor..."
Anonymous wrote:I have a co-worker that insists on being called Dr. when she has a PhD from an online university. lmao