Anonymous wrote:
I'm not down playing the validity. It's just too little to late to be of much good IMO.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here.
He will get the accommodations he needs based on the adhd diagnosis.
I need to sleep on this
If your kid's doctor told him all signs point to him needing glasses.
Would you withhold that information because DS doesn't like glasses, thinks glasses will make him too different, and he seems happy and is getting by without glasses, and telling him might upset him?
Anonymous wrote:OP here.
He will get the accommodations he needs based on the adhd diagnosis.
I need to sleep on this
Anonymous wrote:I can't help but feel the so's attitude is reflective of OP's attitude.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't turn this into some big family secret. This is medical information about your son, that he deserves to know. If he disagrees with the diagnosis, he can always find a different doc to review the evaluation.
I can guarantee he will disagree with it, I know he will.
So what? It's information. It's information about him. He doesn't need to agree with it. He just ought to have it. Because informed people make better decisions than people who have been kept ignorant.
Amen!! I can't believe you would even consider this!!! He is 17 not 7. You must tell him. If you don't tell him and I was the dr who diagnosed him I would be sure to mark you DS's 18th birthday on my calendar and give him a call to let me know.
Anonymous wrote:OP the actor Paddy Considine was in his late 30's finally diagnosed as aspergers. He said that it was a huge relief because it "explained" a lot about his life.
Maybe you can look at it this way, its something to help explain things rather than a burden to be carried?