Anonymous wrote:I want Craig Rice to run. From MoCo.

Not soup yet.

I want Craig Rice to run. From MoCo.

Anonymous wrote:Shocker. A republican who wants to make it easy for rich businesses owners to get even richer, easier. That almost never happens!

What they should do is run them all out of the state. Every damn one of them. Making money on the backs of people so they can play golf. Anyone who owns a business should have to surrender to the state or get out.

Oh, THAT'S a recipe for a successful society!

Anonymous wrote:Not that I love Baker, but I don't understand the argument that Baker is crappy just because he is from PG. PG has problems but has improved in a lot of ways under Baker. Isn't that a sign that he has some skills? Sure, you could vote for someone who was county executive of some "better" place, but really, where's the skill involved in fixing something that isn't broken?

I think Baker's been great.

Anonymous wrote:I don't want to vote for Hogan, but the Dems keep on running candidates who are from Baltimore or PG. Please run someone else.

Ulman is from HoCo. I think a great ticket is Rushern/Ulman. I thought Ulman could have beat Hogan.

Shocker. A republican who wants to make it easy for rich businesses owners to get even richer, easier. That almost never happens!

What they should do is run them all out of the state. Every damn one of them. Making money on the backs of people so they can play golf. Anyone who owns a business should have to surrender to the state or get out.

I'm not in MD but I deal with some of their government agencies as part of my job in VA. The Hogan administration absolutely cleaned house at one department in particular and it's been so much better for industry. Consumers are still protected, as I know that's a big focus in MD, but the department is so much more receptive to business, more polite, and more competent from the top down. I was skeptical but the change has been noticeable.

Anonymous wrote: I'm a Democrat and I'll be voting for him again.

Same here!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not that I love Baker, but I don't understand the argument that Baker is crappy just because he is from PG. PG has problems but has improved in a lot of ways under Baker. Isn't that a sign that he has some skills? Sure, you could vote for someone who was county executive of some "better" place, but really, where's the skill involved in fixing something that isn't broken?

Apparently the skill according to some of the enlightened PPs on this thread is that you need to be governing an area that doesn't have a lot of black people.

And these are the same "Progressives" that claim to be for equality. Same old coded language BS.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Senator Cardin would make a fabulous Governor, allowing for Baker or Brian Frosh to take over for him.

Brian Frosh is like 263 years old.

Minus 193.

Kinda sad that you couldn't knock off an even "200" off my initial guess.

That makes him sound even older.

He is what he is. (70)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Senator Cardin would make a fabulous Governor, allowing for Baker or Brian Frosh to take over for him.

Brian Frosh is like 263 years old.

Minus 193.

Kinda sad that you couldn't knock off an even "200" off my initial guess.

That makes him sound even older.

Anonymous wrote:Why can't Hogan just switch parties? Why does he HAVE to be a republican?

I WANT to vote for him. I like him. If he was a Democrat I'd even be a campaign volunteer for him. IF he was a Dem.

But I can't vote for a republican, no matter how good they are.

What exactly has he done that you view as good? I could not identify a single accomplishment of his tenure.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Senator Cardin would make a fabulous Governor, allowing for Baker or Brian Frosh to take over for him.

There is no way he would quit the senate and run for governor at 75. Senate is a better job.

Frosh is great, but also old. He is doing great where he is.

Anonymous wrote:Not that I love Baker, but I don't understand the argument that Baker is crappy just because he is from PG. PG has problems but has improved in a lot of ways under Baker. Isn't that a sign that he has some skills? Sure, you could vote for someone who was county executive of some "better" place, but really, where's the skill involved in fixing something that isn't broken?

Apparently the skill according to some of the enlightened PPs on this thread is that you need to be governing an area that doesn't have a lot of black people.

Not that I love Baker, but I don't understand the argument that Baker is crappy just because he is from PG. PG has problems but has improved in a lot of ways under Baker. Isn't that a sign that he has some skills? Sure, you could vote for someone who was county executive of some "better" place, but really, where's the skill involved in fixing something that isn't broken?