Anonymous wrote:Shouldn't the prosecution seek evidence of their actual ages? The dad of one is in custody, can't they make him produce a birth certificate or something?

I suspect the men are more like 19 and 20 if not older. In that case, both are least guilt of statutory rape. Open and shut.

This. I hope they do this. No way the men were 17 and 18. Prove that and end the consensual BS.

Anonymous wrote:Shouldn't the prosecution seek evidence of their actual ages? The dad of one is in custody, can't they make him produce a birth certificate or something?

I suspect the men are more like 19 and 20 if not older. In that case, both are least guilt of statutory rape. Open and shut.

Why do you suspect that?

Shouldn't the prosecution seek evidence of their actual ages? The dad of one is in custody, can't they make him produce a birth certificate or something?

I suspect the men are more like 19 and 20 if not older. In that case, both are least guilt of statutory rape. Open and shut.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WaPo is now reporting that bail will be revisited given the texts and pictures that were exchanged between the students. Still a crime given her age though right? Probably reduces the charge though?

What sort of texts and pictures?

The Post article says they are compromising, and that they agreed to meet for sex in the texts.

Flirtation is far removed from 2 guys with vaginal, anal, oral. Of course the WAPO sees nothing wrong with concluding flirtation leading to sex took that route. If people flirt or even chat - meet-ends in date rape is it rape? Well not if they are illegal immigrants.

The USA has lost it's mind.

This. Do you tell your teenage sons that if a 14 yo girl sends you a picture of her boobs, you (and your buddies) are welcome to have anal/oral/vaginal sex with her any time, anywhere? Sick

I say she is most likely mentally ill or has been abused and to avoid her at all cost but be kind.... and to delete the picture.

Then why would it matter if there were 'compromising texts'?? The 18 year old (who was probabaly older) was an adult. Does he have separate rules that apply to him where he is allowed to have sex with kids as he pleases and it's always consensual?

If they are within 4 years, it is consensual if she agreed to the sex.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WaPo is now reporting that bail will be revisited given the texts and pictures that were exchanged between the students. Still a crime given her age though right? Probably reduces the charge though?

What sort of texts and pictures?

The Post article says they are compromising, and that they agreed to meet for sex in the texts.

Flirtation is far removed from 2 guys with vaginal, anal, oral. Of course the WAPO sees nothing wrong with concluding flirtation leading to sex took that route. If people flirt or even chat - meet-ends in date rape is it rape? Well not if they are illegal immigrants.

The USA has lost it's mind.

This. Do you tell your teenage sons that if a 14 yo girl sends you a picture of her boobs, you (and your buddies) are welcome to have anal/oral/vaginal sex with her any time, anywhere? Sick

I say she is most likely mentally ill or has been abused and to avoid her at all cost but be kind.... and to delete the picture.

Then why would it matter if there were 'compromising texts'?? The 18 year old (who was probabaly older) was an adult. Does he have separate rules that apply to him where he is allowed to have sex with kids as he pleases and it's always consensual?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the rape within marriage concept is somewhat analagous here - I read that they are saying that it's consensual bc she was being prepped for an encounter in PE class. Not dragged into the bathroom at 9am, not with two of them - even by the defense attorneys own admission, the circumstantial soft facts don't fit the assault and the hard evidence

This. Even if she agreed to sex with one of the boys, oral, anal, and vaginal penetration with two men, sounds like rape to me.

Haven't visited the Explicit Forum I suspect.

She was 14! Not 18 or 21. She's still a kid.

Because a 14 yo has never done oral, anal (Irish birth control) or vaginal penetration and has never done a twosome?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WaPo is now reporting that bail will be revisited given the texts and pictures that were exchanged between the students. Still a crime given her age though right? Probably reduces the charge though?

What sort of texts and pictures?

The Post article says they are compromising, and that they agreed to meet for sex in the texts.

Flirtation is far removed from 2 guys with vaginal, anal, oral. Of course the WAPO sees nothing wrong with concluding flirtation leading to sex took that route. If people flirt or even chat - meet-ends in date rape is it rape? Well not if they are illegal immigrants.

The USA has lost it's mind.

This. Do you tell your teenage sons that if a 14 yo girl sends you a picture of her boobs, you (and your buddies) are welcome to have anal/oral/vaginal sex with her any time, anywhere? Sick

I say she is most likely mentally ill or has been abused and to avoid her at all cost but be kind.... and to delete the picture.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WaPo is now reporting that bail will be revisited given the texts and pictures that were exchanged between the students. Still a crime given her age though right? Probably reduces the charge though?

What sort of texts and pictures?

The Post article says they are compromising, and that they agreed to meet for sex in the texts.

Flirtation is far removed from 2 guys with vaginal, anal, oral. Of course the WAPO sees nothing wrong with concluding flirtation leading to sex took that route. If people flirt or even chat - meet-ends in date rape is it rape? Well not if they are illegal immigrants.

The USA has lost it's mind.

This. Do you tell your teenage sons that if a 14 yo girl sends you a picture of her boobs, you (and your buddies) are welcome to have anal/oral/vaginal sex with her any time, anywhere? Sick

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the rape within marriage concept is somewhat analagous here - I read that they are saying that it's consensual bc she was being prepped for an encounter in PE class. Not dragged into the bathroom at 9am, not with two of them - even by the defense attorneys own admission, the circumstantial soft facts don't fit the assault and the hard evidence

This. Even if she agreed to sex with one of the boys, oral, anal, and vaginal penetration with two men, sounds like rape to me.

Haven't visited the Explicit Forum I suspect.

She was 14! Not 18 or 21. She's still a kid.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WaPo is now reporting that bail will be revisited given the texts and pictures that were exchanged between the students. Still a crime given her age though right? Probably reduces the charge though?

What sort of texts and pictures?

The Post article says they are compromising, and that they agreed to meet for sex in the texts.

And this is how the scummy sleazy lawyer ends up being effective. Putting doubt in people's heads that this was the case even if it's not. Gross. She was 14.

I agree 14 year olds can have consensual sex but not so much with a 21 year old. I hope they can prove that this bastard was over 18.

You are talking about two of the most competent and skilled criminal defense attorneys in Maryland. But because they are defending someone of Hispanic heritage the attorney(s) are "scummy and sleazy". If they had been defending two Whitman students I guarantee you that you would not be using those terms.

Oh yes people would still think they were scummy and sleazy. I guess these lawyers are looking for $ and jobs in a Democratic alternative universe. Maybe Cristobel Alex will help the darlings.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WaPo is now reporting that bail will be revisited given the texts and pictures that were exchanged between the students. Still a crime given her age though right? Probably reduces the charge though?

What sort of texts and pictures?

The Post article says they are compromising, and that they agreed to meet for sex in the texts.

Flirtation is far removed from 2 guys with vaginal, anal, oral. Of course the WAPO sees nothing wrong with concluding flirtation leading to sex took that route. If people flirt or even chat - meet-ends in date rape is it rape? Well not if they are illegal immigrants.

The USA has lost it's mind.

Anonymous wrote:Anyone know what the bond was set at?

This story should not be repeated.

http://www.ketv.com/article/fugitive-task-force-searching-for-sexual-assault-suspect/9176936

Innocent until proven guilty of course but those who appear high risk should not be released. Doing so puts more of our children at risk.

Well. Since they can cross the border and not always get caught , he could have gone somewhere else in the USA. Since they can register for school with little or no information he could be in HS anywhere but Puerto Rico, Hawaii, or Alaska. The last one he'd have to go through Canada unless on a boat. Hawaii is a flight and Puerto Rico? Usually a flight.


Maybe he's in public school in the DC area. No way of knowing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the rape within marriage concept is somewhat analagous here - I read that they are saying that it's consensual bc she was being prepped for an encounter in PE class. Not dragged into the bathroom at 9am, not with two of them - even by the defense attorneys own admission, the circumstantial soft facts don't fit the assault and the hard evidence

This. Even if she agreed to sex with one of the boys, oral, anal, and vaginal penetration with two men, sounds like rape to me.

Haven't visited the Explicit Forum I suspect.

Anonymous wrote:the rape within marriage concept is somewhat analagous here - I read that they are saying that it's consensual bc she was being prepped for an encounter in PE class. Not dragged into the bathroom at 9am, not with two of them - even by the defense attorneys own admission, the circumstantial soft facts don't fit the assault and the hard evidence

This. Even if she agreed to sex with one of the boys, oral, anal, and vaginal penetration with two men, sounds like rape to me.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here is the Post article. The attorneys for these alleged rapists are the ones saying there are texts and compromising pictures.

Interesting that comments have been closed for this article. I am not surprised. People are angry.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/rockville-high-school-rape-suspect-contends-sexual-contact-was-consensual/2017/03/27/b19d06ea-1332-11e7-9e4f-09aa75d3ec57_story.html?utm_term=.f9e27cf8b947

She's still 14 no matter what the lawyer says.

Daddy is in prison and on his way to being deported apparently.

Whose daddy is in prison? The Daddy of the 18 year old?