Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't. I am 6'4". I like women who are 5' 9"plus.

I feel sorry for your offspring. They will be HUGE.

Anonymous wrote:I have a long held theory about this: I think some men are aroused by young girls (like age 11+) but thankfully would never act on that attraction. The answer, then, is petite women.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most men don't like super short women. They just like very thin women. This is what they think of when they hear "petite" - feminine, delicate, small-boned. Many short women are built like little tanks.

Only if "very thin" is combined with big tits.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most men don't like super short women. They just like very thin women. This is what they think of when they hear "petite" - feminine, delicate, small-boned. Many short women are built like little tanks.

You rarely see tall women who are small boned. Most look like linebackers.

Anonymous wrote:Most men don't like super short women. They just like very thin women. This is what they think of when they hear "petite" - feminine, delicate, small-boned. Many short women are built like little tanks.

Anonymous wrote:Most men don't like super short women. They just like very thin women. This is what they think of when they hear "petite" - feminine, delicate, small-boned. Many short women are built like little tanks.

Anonymous wrote:I am 4'9" and currently 88lbs after having 3 children (was 80lbs before DC 1). My DH, at 5'9", is probably the shortest guy I have have ever had a serious relationship with. Being with taller guys has always made me feel more protected. I have never had a problem getting male attention .

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Man here in 30s. Love "fun size" women. Why? Sex is better. Yes, I can squat 300 lbs and bench 225. I'm a 6' dude. Not small, but when I'm having sex I don't want it to be a workout. It's much more fun to have sex picking a woman up and tossing her around when she's 100-115 lbs than 140/150+. Also clothes. Tiny women look good in more suggestive outfits (crop tops, short skirts, denim shorts, etc.) Visually seeing a taut tummy is appealing.

You are a lazy lover. I bet you never had a woman who could bend you into a pretzel and toss you like salad.

Assume what you want. I was pretty clear. Just because I can push 200lbs up and down doesn't mean I have to like doing it in the bedroom. I prefer to leave that to cross fit and/or the gym. Good thing for me is there's plenty of supply for 100-115lb women that I've never had to date heavier.

I see why you are single.

Not looking for a relationship =)... doesn't mean I don't get laid sweetie

I guess you call your hand, a date.

Why so much hate because he doesn't want to date fat chicks? What is it with heavy women so sensitive when guys don't find them attractive. I'm 5 feet and about 110 lbs and don't find tiny little men attractive, so I go for tall guys with a nice build. Friend of mine is 200 lbs her DH probably 130 soaking wet and shorter than she is. It's all about preference, and that's okay. People are allowed to have preferences. Bigger gals need to stop thinking men who don't find them attractive are pigs or mean or shallow. They just don't dig fat chicks.

I completely agree with you- it's ridiculous that overly-sensitive people are flipping out because of one person's preference, especially when it's likely they have physical preferences of their own.

The only thing is, at 110 pounds and 5 ft, you aren't petite. You a short, but a husky, sturdy thing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't. I am 6'4". I like women who are 5' 9"plus.

I feel sorry for your offspring. They will be HUGE.

Why would you be sorry? Normal/ tall is preferable to Lilliputian.

I think large/real tall girls have hard time socially.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Man here in 30s. Love "fun size" women. Why? Sex is better. Yes, I can squat 300 lbs and bench 225. I'm a 6' dude. Not small, but when I'm having sex I don't want it to be a workout. It's much more fun to have sex picking a woman up and tossing her around when she's 100-115 lbs than 140/150+. Also clothes. Tiny women look good in more suggestive outfits (crop tops, short skirts, denim shorts, etc.) Visually seeing a taut tummy is appealing.

You are a lazy lover. I bet you never had a woman who could bend you into a pretzel and toss you like salad.

Assume what you want. I was pretty clear. Just because I can push 200lbs up and down doesn't mean I have to like doing it in the bedroom. I prefer to leave that to cross fit and/or the gym. Good thing for me is there's plenty of supply for 100-115lb women that I've never had to date heavier.

I see why you are single.

Not looking for a relationship =)... doesn't mean I don't get laid sweetie

I guess you call your hand, a date.

Why so much hate because he doesn't want to date fat chicks? What is it with heavy women so sensitive when guys don't find them attractive. I'm 5 feet and about 110 lbs and don't find tiny little men attractive, so I go for tall guys with a nice build. Friend of mine is 200 lbs her DH probably 130 soaking wet and shorter than she is. It's all about preference, and that's okay. People are allowed to have preferences. Bigger gals need to stop thinking men who don't find them attractive are pigs or mean or shallow. They just don't dig fat chicks.

Anonymous wrote:Just a guys POV but once they are on their backs womens' heights don't really make much of a difference.