Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL Ivanka doesn't even look like Ivanka. She's had a lot of work done. Kate looks more natural aging.

I don't see that at all. I think her pics 10 years ago look very similar to her pics today. And for those who are saying photoshop, when you see her on TV, does she look worse than here in these pics? I think she looks even better on camera than in the still shots.

She's definitely had at least one nose job and a boob job, and of course she is naturally brunette, so the blonde is fake too.

Uh, why do you think she's the only Trump with a chin? Hint: it's not genetics.

Yeah, definitely genetics

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL Ivanka doesn't even look like Ivanka. She's had a lot of work done. Kate looks more natural aging.

I don't see that at all. I think her pics 10 years ago look very similar to her pics today. And for those who are saying photoshop, when you see her on TV, does she look worse than here in these pics? I think she looks even better on camera than in the still shots.

She's definitely had at least one nose job and a boob job, and of course she is naturally brunette, so the blonde is fake too.

Uh, why do you think she's the only Trump with a chin? Hint: it's not genetics.

I agree with the PP who mentioned Kylie Jenner.

Kylie was cute, but had none of the standout beauty of her sisters.
Kendall definitely outshines Kylie 100x over.
For a celebrity at best she was average.

Then shortly before hitting 18-Boom!!
Fuller lips, a better sculpted nose, bigger breasts and some fillers for her face and she turned into an overnight beauty which has afforded her riches.

She now trademarks her phony new look and makes huge bank to boot.

Smart marketing decision ever.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Kate has less botox than ivanka.

Also, in general, brown eyes comes with a skin type that doesn't wrinkle as much. My dermatologist explained it this way: with blue eyes, skin is thin like newspaper, you crinkle it up and spread it out, and the creases remain. The darker complected you are, the thicker the skin. By the time you get to the darkest of Africans, their skin is as thick as velvet--scrunch it up and smooth it out and it's as good as new.

With Ivanka, remember the blonde is fake and she is a darker individual than Kate.

WTH?

You know all human skin is just as thin, right? Melanin (or absence of it) doesn't make skin thick like velvet or thin like newspaper.

Different poster here. There is actually some truth to this. Different plastic surgeons tend to specialize in different races, because certain kinds of skin have a thickness that others do not.

Anonymous wrote:You are comparing an outdoor candid shot and a studio still.


Why are you so obsessed with Kate? Did you guys go to middle school together?
She married a prince.
She's royalty.
She's an international style icon.
She has beautiful children.
She's rich.


She won. Get over it.

+1

Best. Post. Ever.

She's not worried about you.

These two women look great and dress well.

Welcome back Kate Middleton hater!

Did you take a break for the election?

Seriously, your fixation on Princess Kate is bizarre.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL Ivanka doesn't even look like Ivanka. She's had a lot of work done. Kate looks more natural aging.

I don't see that at all. I think her pics 10 years ago look very similar to her pics today. And for those who are saying photoshop, when you see her on TV, does she look worse than here in these pics? I think she looks even better on camera than in the still shots.

She's definitely had at least one nose job and a boob job, and of course she is naturally brunette, so the blonde is fake too.

minor now job and a boob job (both of which were completely unnecessary and she would be equally pretty without them) do not count as "a lot of work done". if you want a lot of work done, look at kylie jenner. that is a case of an below average person transforming themselves into something unrecognizable. ivanka looks pretty much the same she did when she was a teenager.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL Ivanka doesn't even look like Ivanka. She's had a lot of work done. Kate looks more natural aging.

I don't see that at all. I think her pics 10 years ago look very similar to her pics today. And for those who are saying photoshop, when you see her on TV, does she look worse than here in these pics? I think she looks even better on camera than in the still shots.

She's definitely had at least one nose job and a boob job, and of course she is naturally brunette, so the blonde is fake too.

OMG SHE DIES HER HAIR! so fake!!!

Anonymous wrote:Hilarious that people are taking jabs at Ivanka for maybe having work done (no one knows for sure), when there are 17 threads going on right now in this forum about boob jobs, nose jobs, fillers, and Botox.

Ha! Yes, so DCUM.

Hilarious that people are taking jabs at Ivanka for maybe having work done (no one knows for sure), when there are 17 threads going on right now in this forum about boob jobs, nose jobs, fillers, and Botox.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL Ivanka doesn't even look like Ivanka. She's had a lot of work done. Kate looks more natural aging.

I don't see that at all. I think her pics 10 years ago look very similar to her pics today. And for those who are saying photoshop, when you see her on TV, does she look worse than here in these pics? I think she looks even better on camera than in the still shots.

She's definitely had at least one nose job and a boob job, and of course she is naturally brunette, so the blonde is fake too.

I don't take that to equal "Ivanka doesn't even look like Ivanka." That implies major changes to her face, much more than a nose job. Boobs don't make you look like a different person. None of the things you mentioned would lend to a younger appearance.

Regarding hair color, most women change up hair color to some degree. I view hair as an accessory and have had many different colors and styles. A lot of stylish women do. Anyway. I think they're both pretty women but think, objectively, Ivanka looks younger.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL Ivanka doesn't even look like Ivanka. She's had a lot of work done. Kate looks more natural aging.

I don't see that at all. I think her pics 10 years ago look very similar to her pics today. And for those who are saying photoshop, when you see her on TV, does she look worse than here in these pics? I think she looks even better on camera than in the still shots.

She's definitely had at least one nose job and a boob job, and of course she is naturally brunette, so the blonde is fake too.

Anonymous wrote:LOL Ivanka doesn't even look like Ivanka. She's had a lot of work done. Kate looks more natural aging.

I don't see that at all. I think her pics 10 years ago look very similar to her pics today. And for those who are saying photoshop, when you see her on TV, does she look worse than here in these pics? I think she looks even better on camera than in the still shots.

I think most of it is genetics. All my family look super young and I at 33 am still mistaken for 18. (Yes, really). Make-up, lifestyles and clothing make a difference but I would say it comes down to genes.