Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope she does not abandon us on Saturday. Maybe we should March up to her DC residents and draft her for 2020? Image how powerful that would. The leaderless march finds its leader and marches to the White House.

I can se it now. Hills in her white pantsuit standing on the balcony off her morning room singing don't cry for me loser ladies

Then Ivanka's kids set up a stand to sell green shakes to the loser ladies invading their neighborhood.

Cool

God, I hate homeschoolers.

Me too. Maybe you should consider getting a job rather than being a SAHM with only home schoolers at the park

Anonymous wrote:I hope she does not abandon us on Saturday. Maybe we should March up to her DC residents and draft her for 2020? Image how powerful that would. The leaderless march finds its leader and marches to the White House.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I support the March and I support Clinton too but I don't think she should come. The March isn't about her, it's about for standing up for women's rights in the face of Trump's attempts to grab at our p@ssies.

I don't think she would be deserting us if she doesn't come. She'll be letting us find our own voices. If she comes, SHE becomes the story, not the people marching. She would concentrate everyone's attention on her.

At the same time, I could understand her wanting to come to support other women. Either way, I'm not mad at her. She has sacrificed plenty. I just don't agree with people who are saying if she doesn't come, she let's everyone down. Nope.

Honey, Trump doesn't want your pussies, he wants your purses. If the march were about the country's unwise spending and tax policy I would be at the head along with Hillary Clinton who is a 1 percenter too

Otherwise, not interested. But f you want to promote your agenda, Godspeed. I support you

Do you have a young daughter? Let me guess, us but she's primarily concerned with fiscal policy?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope she does not abandon us on Saturday. Maybe we should March up to her DC residents and draft her for 2020? Image how powerful that would. The leaderless march finds its leader and marches to the White House.

I can se it now. Hills in her white pantsuit standing on the balcony off her morning room singing don't cry for me loser ladies

Then Ivanka's kids set up a stand to sell green shakes to the loser ladies invading their neighborhood.

Cool

God, I hate homeschoolers.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I support the March and I support Clinton too but I don't think she should come. The March isn't about her, it's about for standing up for women's rights in the face of Trump's attempts to grab at our p@ssies.

I don't think she would be deserting us if she doesn't come. She'll be letting us find our own voices. If she comes, SHE becomes the story, not the people marching. She would concentrate everyone's attention on her.

At the same time, I could understand her wanting to come to support other women. Either way, I'm not mad at her. She has sacrificed plenty. I just don't agree with people who are saying if she doesn't come, she let's everyone down. Nope.

Honey, Trump doesn't want your pussies, he wants your purses. If the march were about the country's unwise spending and tax policy I would be at the head along with Hillary Clinton who is a 1 percenter too

Otherwise, not interested. But f you want to promote your agenda, Godspeed. I support you

Anonymous wrote:I hope she does not abandon us on Saturday. Maybe we should March up to her DC residents and draft her for 2020? Image how powerful that would. The leaderless march finds its leader and marches to the White House.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope she does not abandon us on Saturday. Maybe we should March up to her DC residents and draft her for 2020? Image how powerful that would. The leaderless march finds its leader and marches to the White House.

I can se it now. Hills in her white pantsuit standing on the balcony off her morning room singing don't cry for me loser ladies

Then Ivanka's kids set up a stand to sell green shakes to the loser ladies invading their neighborhood.

Cool

Anonymous wrote:I hope she does not abandon us on Saturday. Maybe we should March up to her DC residents and draft her for 2020? Image how powerful that would. The leaderless march finds its leader and marches to the White House.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Prediction: She will march, but it will be in NYC. The event is at the UN and so offers a nice symbolism for her past work empowering women globally, and diminishes the focus on her meaning within the US political process.

She'll come for the Inauguration ceremony because she's a gracious loser, but she will leave DC immediately afterwards.

I am thinking Qatar.....https://www.google.com/amp/s/theinternationalreporter.org/2016/10/17/hillary-clintons-sudden-move-of-1-8-billion-to-qatar-central-bank-stuns-financial-world/amp/?client=ms-android-att-us

She didn't seem very gracious on election night. She had a lot of people there who put in a lot of work campaigning and supporting her. Geeze, she could have at least said "thank you" to everyone. But no, she had to be refrained from killing poor Bill and attacking creepy Podesta.

Are you reading a different concession speech than I am?

http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/09/politics/hillary-clinton-concession-speech/

NP. No, but you're talking about her speech the next day. Normally, concessions happen the night of the election.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Love HRC. But I hope she doesn't show. This March is not supposed to be about her, per se. She comes, and it turned into the sore loser brigade. Rather than focusing attention on women and minorities and immigrants and Muslims and peaceful resistance to Trump, it will shine the spotlight on HRC. We are now in a post-HRC world. We should not be giving any ammunition to the Trumpkins who meet any citicism of Trump with "sore loser" and "but Hillary". This March is about ideas and values. Not one individual person.

Seriously, blacks have to be pissed that all the liberal attention is shifting to Muslims, the minority du jour.

A few years ago it was Hispanics overtaking blacks, now the Muslims.

So now it's a popularity fight among minorities? That's healthy.

Anonymous wrote:I support the March and I support Clinton too but I don't think she should come. The March isn't about her, it's about for standing up for women's rights in the face of Trump's attempts to grab at our p@ssies.

I don't think she would be deserting us if she doesn't come. She'll be letting us find our own voices. If she comes, SHE becomes the story, not the people marching. She would concentrate everyone's attention on her.

At the same time, I could understand her wanting to come to support other women. Either way, I'm not mad at her. She has sacrificed plenty. I just don't agree with people who are saying if she doesn't come, she let's everyone down. Nope.