Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No such thing as a "low ivy".
Yes there is and Brown is it. But I can't imagine not choosing it in this circmstance.
Brown is more selective than Penn, as well as Dartmouth and Cornell
Still the bottom feeder rep wise.
LOL
The Brown bashing on this board is funny. Maybe it stems from conservatives who hew to the outdated stereotype of Brown as a crazy liberal outlier? As the academy has gone farther and farther left, Brown is longer ideologically different from most other highly selective schools - 15 years ago it was radically progressive when Brown grappled with its history as a slave-owning institution, now Georgetown, Harvard, Yale and others are following suit. Brown retains its open curriculum and Pass/Fail option for every course. Once upon a time, maybe that fostered laziness, but today there are no lazy kids getting into Brown or any other highly selective school.
My sense of the original post is that it's a troll. But if it's not, then my advice is to have your daughter get into Brown first, and then worry about this "problem" - fewer than 8% of female applicants are accepted.
Wrong. It's been well documented that rich parents buy Brown admission for their lazy kids. It's not a "best and the brightest" environment at all, compared to HYPS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No such thing as a "low ivy".
Yes there is and Brown is it. But I can't imagine not choosing it in this circmstance.
Brown is more selective than Penn, as well as Dartmouth and Cornell
Still the bottom feeder rep wise.
LOL
The Brown bashing on this board is funny. Maybe it stems from conservatives who hew to the outdated stereotype of Brown as a crazy liberal outlier? As the academy has gone farther and farther left, Brown is longer ideologically different from most other highly selective schools - 15 years ago it was radically progressive when Brown grappled with its history as a slave-owning institution, now Georgetown, Harvard, Yale and others are following suit. Brown retains its open curriculum and Pass/Fail option for every course. Once upon a time, maybe that fostered laziness, but today there are no lazy kids getting into Brown or any other highly selective school.
My sense of the original post is that it's a troll. But if it's not, then my advice is to have your daughter get into Brown first, and then worry about this "problem" - fewer than 8% of female applicants are accepted.
Wrong. It's been well documented that rich parents buy Brown admission for their lazy kids. It's not a "best and the brightest" environment at all, compared to HYPS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In re to Brown's endowment: Yes, it's the smallest in the Ivy League, but they don't have the business, law, and various grad programs the others fund. Brown seems most focused on offering a liberals arts undergrad experience.
brown has a medical school.
princeton doesn't and princeton doesn't have a law or b-school either.
princeton's giving rate by alums and endowment destroy browns.
Princeton actually destroys everyone when it comes to endowment per student, which is the far more meaningful figure than total endowment. Princeton stands alone with a staggering endowment of $2.81M per student. With a conservative endowment draw of 4%, that spins off more than $112K per year for each student. Yale is the only other school that tops $2M per student (Harvard is 3rd at $1.7M).
A list is here: http://www.reachhighscholars.org/college_endowments.html
Grinnell is #9 - the last school on the list above the $1M per student mark - so I guess you who judge a school by its endowment will be rushing to send your kids there.
Was surprised to see Richmond so high at #15 - helps explain the beautiful campus and lavish merit aid.
I went to a school that's in the top 10 of the endowment/student rankings and it didn't seem very 'rich' on the outside and the merit aid isn't super lavish either.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No such thing as a "low ivy".
Yes there is and Brown is it. But I can't imagine not choosing it in this circmstance.
Brown is more selective than Penn, as well as Dartmouth and Cornell
Still the bottom feeder rep wise.
LOL
The Brown bashing on this board is funny. Maybe it stems from conservatives who hew to the outdated stereotype of Brown as a crazy liberal outlier? As the academy has gone farther and farther left, Brown is longer ideologically different from most other highly selective schools - 15 years ago it was radically progressive when Brown grappled with its history as a slave-owning institution, now Georgetown, Harvard, Yale and others are following suit. Brown retains its open curriculum and Pass/Fail option for every course. Once upon a time, maybe that fostered laziness, but today there are no lazy kids getting into Brown or any other highly selective school.
My sense of the original post is that it's a troll. But if it's not, then my advice is to have your daughter get into Brown first, and then worry about this "problem" - fewer than 8% of female applicants are accepted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In re to Brown's endowment: Yes, it's the smallest in the Ivy League, but they don't have the business, law, and various grad programs the others fund. Brown seems most focused on offering a liberals arts undergrad experience.
brown has a medical school.
princeton doesn't and princeton doesn't have a law or b-school either.
princeton's giving rate by alums and endowment destroy browns.
Princeton actually destroys everyone when it comes to endowment per student, which is the far more meaningful figure than total endowment. Princeton stands alone with a staggering endowment of $2.81M per student. With a conservative endowment draw of 4%, that spins off more than $112K per year for each student. Yale is the only other school that tops $2M per student (Harvard is 3rd at $1.7M).
A list is here: http://www.reachhighscholars.org/college_endowments.html
Grinnell is #9 - the last school on the list above the $1M per student mark - so I guess you who judge a school by its endowment will be rushing to send your kids there.
Was surprised to see Richmond so high at #15 - helps explain the beautiful campus and lavish merit aid.
grinnell has a had a hard time getting domestic students to come and was forced to take omore international students - they said the undershot enrollment figures and exhausted waitlists. seems like people don't want to go there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In re to Brown's endowment: Yes, it's the smallest in the Ivy League, but they don't have the business, law, and various grad programs the others fund. Brown seems most focused on offering a liberals arts undergrad experience.
brown has a medical school.
princeton doesn't and princeton doesn't have a law or b-school either.
princeton's giving rate by alums and endowment destroy browns.
Princeton actually destroys everyone when it comes to endowment per student, which is the far more meaningful figure than total endowment. Princeton stands alone with a staggering endowment of $2.81M per student. With a conservative endowment draw of 4%, that spins off more than $112K per year for each student. Yale is the only other school that tops $2M per student (Harvard is 3rd at $1.7M).
A list is here: http://www.reachhighscholars.org/college_endowments.html
Grinnell is #9 - the last school on the list above the $1M per student mark - so I guess you who judge a school by its endowment will be rushing to send your kids there.
Was surprised to see Richmond so high at #15 - helps explain the beautiful campus and lavish merit aid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In re to Brown's endowment: Yes, it's the smallest in the Ivy League, but they don't have the business, law, and various grad programs the others fund. Brown seems most focused on offering a liberals arts undergrad experience.
brown has a medical school.
princeton doesn't and princeton doesn't have a law or b-school either.
princeton's giving rate by alums and endowment destroy browns.
Princeton actually destroys everyone when it comes to endowment per student, which is the far more meaningful figure than total endowment. Princeton stands alone with a staggering endowment of $2.81M per student. With a conservative endowment draw of 4%, that spins off more than $112K per year for each student. Yale is the only other school that tops $2M per student (Harvard is 3rd at $1.7M).
A list is here: http://www.reachhighscholars.org/college_endowments.html
Grinnell is #9 - the last school on the list above the $1M per student mark - so I guess you who judge a school by its endowment will be rushing to send your kids there.
Was surprised to see Richmond so high at #15 - helps explain the beautiful campus and lavish merit aid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In re to Brown's endowment: Yes, it's the smallest in the Ivy League, but they don't have the business, law, and various grad programs the others fund. Brown seems most focused on offering a liberals arts undergrad experience.
brown has a medical school.
princeton doesn't and princeton doesn't have a law or b-school either.
princeton's giving rate by alums and endowment destroy browns.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Brown< W&M, but in state tuition makes this a closer call. How much will the difference in tuition set you back? If it means DD will need to take out lot more student loans to attend Brown I'd think twice. Otherwise I'd let her go with Brown if that what she wants. It will be a more diverse group of kids, I think. Also the Ivy status still carries a bit more weight with future employers.
You realize you wrote Brown is less than W&M, don't you? Clearly you didn't get into either.
 Anonymous wrote:In re to Brown's endowment: Yes, it's the smallest in the Ivy League, but they don't have the business, law, and various grad programs the others fund. Brown seems most focused on offering a liberals arts undergrad experience.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:W&M is a suicide school.
Less so than Penn.