Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I grew up in an affluent area, though my parents weren't nearly as wealthy as most of my classmates. (Chicago suburb.)
Probably the wealthiest boy in my class had a job bagging groceries at the local mom and pop grocery store. His father was a big time exec and my house could have fit inside of his house ten times. His parents were filthy rich. But SO kind. And he bagged groceries.
Gross. In Chicago, those are union jobs. I can't even imagine allowing or suggesting my child join a union.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My son's time is better spent fast tracking his way through high school. He is on track to finish a year early. So, he will enter university and the job force one year early.
So, yeah his time is better spent on school instead of making minimum wage.
Is that a good thing? So he can be out there on the grind for 46 years instead of 45? (give or take)
He just retire a year ahead of time. Duh.
Who knows? Retirement isn't a set age. Have fun while you're young. Work can wait.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How could this possibly be self-defeating in the big picture of life?
Grades, extracurriculars, community engagement are more important. Only so many hours in a day. It seems middle class parents are old school and think a job toughens their kid up -- meanwhile UMC parents have their kids learning calculus and computer programming, you know, real skills.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My son's time is better spent fast tracking his way through high school. He is on track to finish a year early. So, he will enter university and the job force one year early.
So, yeah his time is better spent on school instead of making minimum wage.
Is that a good thing? So he can be out there on the grind for 46 years instead of 45? (give or take)
He just retire a year ahead of time. Duh.
Who knows? Retirement isn't a set age. Have fun while you're young. Work can wait.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My son's time is better spent fast tracking his way through high school. He is on track to finish a year early. So, he will enter university and the job force one year early.
So, yeah his time is better spent on school instead of making minimum wage.
Is that a good thing? So he can be out there on the grind for 46 years instead of 45? (give or take)
He just retire a year ahead of time. Duh.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My son's time is better spent fast tracking his way through high school. He is on track to finish a year early. So, he will enter university and the job force one year early.
So, yeah his time is better spent on school instead of making minimum wage.
Is that a good thing? So he can be out there on the grind for 46 years instead of 45? (give or take)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My son's time is better spent fast tracking his way through high school. He is on track to finish a year early. So, he will enter university and the job force one year early.
So, yeah his time is better spent on school instead of making minimum wage.
I work at a university in and believe me, I see plenty of these kids. They don't cope well when they realize they are 20 years old and have to go out into the real world as adults and have no clue how to function outside the classroom. You think its good now but in 5 years you will see it differently.
Anonymous wrote:My son's time is better spent fast tracking his way through high school. He is on track to finish a year early. So, he will enter university and the job force one year early.
So, yeah his time is better spent on school instead of making minimum wage.
Anonymous wrote:My son's time is better spent fast tracking his way through high school. He is on track to finish a year early. So, he will enter university and the job force one year early.
So, yeah his time is better spent on school instead of making minimum wage.
Anonymous wrote:It's really good character building. It's empowering for them to have their own money and a life outside of home and school. It teaches them to juggle responsibilities. For boys they are going to be working the next 50 years to support a family, they need to get ready. Girls as well although obviously some will sah at some point but they need to know how to work and have that skill to fall back on to support themselves.
Work isn't a dirty word. It's good for people.
Anonymous wrote:right, because kids should be cuddled their entire lives so when is time to greet the world they have no ability to manage time or stress, no value of what it takes to earn a dollar, etc. I think the real question is why don't more parents require their kids to work ten hours a week?