Anonymous wrote:Oh, OP, your chickens are home to roost. Gaslighting is what you guys do best, so we've learned from you. Prepare to get a taste of your own medicine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is not gas lighting when you quote someone's words, verbatim. Sorry charlie.
It is gaslighting when you say "I want an apology" and you get it (acceptance speech + visiting White house graciously) and then you say "nope... that isn't enough! you should have done something else or something different." Its gaslighting because you know that no matter what you will never get over it.
You do not understand the words "apology" or "gas lighting"
Gaslighting: manipulate (someone) by psychological means into questioning their own sanity
The right says "I want secure boarders and for everyone to obey the law"
The left says "you are racist! You are a xenophobe!" ( riot, burn stuff, smash other peoples private property) "if you (the right) showed me some understanding and feel my pain I will stop burning stuff and stop hating you!"
The right thinks Am I crazy? I'm not a racist?
The right says "Lets work this out.... you know we can keep the good stuff in Obama care... Maybe we not need to build a wall..."
The left says "I can't be your friend on facebook and I can never talk to you again"
The right thinks Am I crazy? I thought they said hey wanted me to be aware of their pain and understand them.
I think the OP understands gaslighting
Nice try, but no. Being accused of racism is not gaslighting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The libs are doing the same manipulative crap my ex wife did when we were going through counseling. Shes kept saying that it was me and I needed to fix this thing or that thing before she could move forward and no matter what I did it was never enough. I was living on egg shells for a long time. Looking back I can see that she never really wanted to reconcile things. She just wanted me to be the one to blow things up so she could look innocent and play the sympathy card.
I'm seeing the same dynamic between the right and the libs.
Cool story, bro.
Here is an example: If you are not on their side, the Dems will offer you no sympathy. You have no value to them.
you don't get it. i can't sympathize with someone who voted for someone who stands for racism, xenophobia, homophobia, etc. you have voted for someone who doesn't believe in the things I think "make america great" - like the first amendment, diversity, etc. why am I not allowed to say that i'm not good with that? why do you think it's manipulative to express my viewpoint? i really feel like this country has elected someone not unlike hitler and it's horrifying to me that so many of my fellow americans voted for him. would you offer sympathy to someone who supported hitler? that's how it feels to me and that's why I can't offer sympathy.
No. YOU don't get it. You want to believe that a vote that doesn't agree with yours automatically makes someone worth demonizing. They're not all racists, xenophobes or homophobes just because they don't prioritize the same way that you do. People lead complex lives and yet electoral decisions ultimately come down to winner take all. You're bitter and want to lash out, but it won't help you learn from your side's mistakes. They didn't agree with you. They don't like her. Many of them don't like him either, they just dislike him less.
Keep trying to paint them into a box and you'll keep losing.
You and others on the right do the exact same thing you are demonizing. You totally put down and dismiss Liberals. You need to practice what you preach or you're a total hypocrite. I agree with the PP, if you vote for a racist misogynist, you agree with the content of their message and you are one too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The libs are doing the same manipulative crap my ex wife did when we were going through counseling. Shes kept saying that it was me and I needed to fix this thing or that thing before she could move forward and no matter what I did it was never enough. I was living on egg shells for a long time. Looking back I can see that she never really wanted to reconcile things. She just wanted me to be the one to blow things up so she could look innocent and play the sympathy card.
I'm seeing the same dynamic between the right and the libs.
Cool story, bro.
Here is an example: If you are not on their side, the Dems will offer you no sympathy. You have no value to them.
you don't get it. i can't sympathize with someone who voted for someone who stands for racism, xenophobia, homophobia, etc. you have voted for someone who doesn't believe in the things I think "make america great" - like the first amendment, diversity, etc. why am I not allowed to say that i'm not good with that? why do you think it's manipulative to express my viewpoint? i really feel like this country has elected someone not unlike hitler and it's horrifying to me that so many of my fellow americans voted for him. would you offer sympathy to someone who supported hitler? that's how it feels to me and that's why I can't offer sympathy.
No. YOU don't get it. You want to believe that a vote that doesn't agree with yours automatically makes someone worth demonizing. They're not all racists, xenophobes or homophobes just because they don't prioritize the same way that you do. People lead complex lives and yet electoral decisions ultimately come down to winner take all. You're bitter and want to lash out, but it won't help you learn from your side's mistakes. They didn't agree with you. They don't like her. Many of them don't like him either, they just dislike him less.
Keep trying to paint them into a box and you'll keep losing.
You and others on the right do the exact same thing you are demonizing. You totally put down and dismiss Liberals. You need to practice what you preach or you're a total hypocrite. I agree with the PP, if you vote for a racist misogynist, you agree with the content of their message and you are one too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The libs are doing the same manipulative crap my ex wife did when we were going through counseling. Shes kept saying that it was me and I needed to fix this thing or that thing before she could move forward and no matter what I did it was never enough. I was living on egg shells for a long time. Looking back I can see that she never really wanted to reconcile things. She just wanted me to be the one to blow things up so she could look innocent and play the sympathy card.
I'm seeing the same dynamic between the right and the libs.
Cool story, bro.
Here is an example: If you are not on their side, the Dems will offer you no sympathy. You have no value to them.
you don't get it. i can't sympathize with someone who voted for someone who stands for racism, xenophobia, homophobia, etc. you have voted for someone who doesn't believe in the things I think "make america great" - like the first amendment, diversity, etc. why am I not allowed to say that i'm not good with that? why do you think it's manipulative to express my viewpoint? i really feel like this country has elected someone not unlike hitler and it's horrifying to me that so many of my fellow americans voted for him. would you offer sympathy to someone who supported hitler? that's how it feels to me and that's why I can't offer sympathy.
No. YOU don't get it. You want to believe that a vote that doesn't agree with yours automatically makes someone worth demonizing. They're not all racists, xenophobes or homophobes just because they don't prioritize the same way that you do. People lead complex lives and yet electoral decisions ultimately come down to winner take all. You're bitter and want to lash out, but it won't help you learn from your side's mistakes. They didn't agree with you. They don't like her. Many of them don't like him either, they just dislike him less.
Keep trying to paint them into a box and you'll keep losing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The libs are doing the same manipulative crap my ex wife did when we were going through counseling. Shes kept saying that it was me and I needed to fix this thing or that thing before she could move forward and no matter what I did it was never enough. I was living on egg shells for a long time. Looking back I can see that she never really wanted to reconcile things. She just wanted me to be the one to blow things up so she could look innocent and play the sympathy card.
I'm seeing the same dynamic between the right and the libs.
Cool story, bro.
Here is an example: If you are not on their side, the Dems will offer you no sympathy. You have no value to them.
you don't get it. i can't sympathize with someone who voted for someone who stands for racism, xenophobia, homophobia, etc. you have voted for someone who doesn't believe in the things I think "make america great" - like the first amendment, diversity, etc. why am I not allowed to say that i'm not good with that? why do you think it's manipulative to express my viewpoint? i really feel like this country has elected someone not unlike hitler and it's horrifying to me that so many of my fellow americans voted for him. would you offer sympathy to someone who supported hitler? that's how it feels to me and that's why I can't offer sympathy.
No. YOU don't get it. You want to believe that a vote that doesn't agree with yours automatically makes someone worth demonizing. They're not all racists, xenophobes or homophobes just because they don't prioritize the same way that you do. People lead complex lives and yet electoral decisions ultimately come down to winner take all. You're bitter and want to lash out, but it won't help you learn from your side's mistakes. They didn't agree with you. They don't like her. Many of them don't like him either, they just dislike him less.
Keep trying to paint them into a box and you'll keep losing.
Blah blah blah. Meanwhile fascist Trump has announced plans to make the fascist Bannon his chief domestic policy sdvisor.
People who care about the future of this country should rise up in opposition to this decision.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The libs are doing the same manipulative crap my ex wife did when we were going through counseling. Shes kept saying that it was me and I needed to fix this thing or that thing before she could move forward and no matter what I did it was never enough. I was living on egg shells for a long time. Looking back I can see that she never really wanted to reconcile things. She just wanted me to be the one to blow things up so she could look innocent and play the sympathy card.
I'm seeing the same dynamic between the right and the libs.
Cool story, bro.
Here is an example: If you are not on their side, the Dems will offer you no sympathy. You have no value to them.
you don't get it. i can't sympathize with someone who voted for someone who stands for racism, xenophobia, homophobia, etc. you have voted for someone who doesn't believe in the things I think "make america great" - like the first amendment, diversity, etc. why am I not allowed to say that i'm not good with that? why do you think it's manipulative to express my viewpoint? i really feel like this country has elected someone not unlike hitler and it's horrifying to me that so many of my fellow americans voted for him. would you offer sympathy to someone who supported hitler? that's how it feels to me and that's why I can't offer sympathy.
No. YOU don't get it. You want to believe that a vote that doesn't agree with yours automatically makes someone worth demonizing. They're not all racists, xenophobes or homophobes just because they don't prioritize the same way that you do. People lead complex lives and yet electoral decisions ultimately come down to winner take all. You're bitter and want to lash out, but it won't help you learn from your side's mistakes. They didn't agree with you. They don't like her. Many of them don't like him either, they just dislike him less.
Keep trying to paint them into a box and you'll keep losing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand how people are upset about Clinton's words calling for people to accept the election results but continue to fight misogyny not being "gracious" enough when their candidate is the least gracious person ever.
No matter what she did, it wouldn't be enough for you unless she spent 24/7 out there protesting the protests, so I guess by your own definition you are gas lighting us supposed gas lighters. This is getting confusing.
It's not about misogyny; it's about jobs and having enough money to pay bills and support one's family.
Well people aren't going to be able to do that if they don't have skills to offer. Our world has changed and these people's skill sets are obsolete. They didn't keep up with technology.
So you're saying what? Just screw them?
The free trade deals and insistence on unimpeded globalism could've been paired with an eye toward looking out for those who would be hurt.
Maybe place a higher value on training and/or being willing to leave their one-horse company town. Yes, we make a good living here, but neither of us could have done that in the towns we were raised in. It's not the government's job to prop you up because nobody wants the product your plant was selling.
Okay, so you're already Republicans. Fair enough.
So then why do the Trump voters want a free job handout??
The Trump voters I know are wealthy retirees. They don't want any free handouts, they're tired of everyone else who does.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The libs are doing the same manipulative crap my ex wife did when we were going through counseling. Shes kept saying that it was me and I needed to fix this thing or that thing before she could move forward and no matter what I did it was never enough. I was living on egg shells for a long time. Looking back I can see that she never really wanted to reconcile things. She just wanted me to be the one to blow things up so she could look innocent and play the sympathy card.
I'm seeing the same dynamic between the right and the libs.
Cool story, bro.
Here is an example: If you are not on their side, the Dems will offer you no sympathy. You have no value to them.
you don't get it. i can't sympathize with someone who voted for someone who stands for racism, xenophobia, homophobia, etc. you have voted for someone who doesn't believe in the things I think "make america great" - like the first amendment, diversity, etc. why am I not allowed to say that i'm not good with that? why do you think it's manipulative to express my viewpoint? i really feel like this country has elected someone not unlike hitler and it's horrifying to me that so many of my fellow americans voted for him. would you offer sympathy to someone who supported hitler? that's how it feels to me and that's why I can't offer sympathy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The libs are doing the same manipulative crap my ex wife did when we were going through counseling. Shes kept saying that it was me and I needed to fix this thing or that thing before she could move forward and no matter what I did it was never enough. I was living on egg shells for a long time. Looking back I can see that she never really wanted to reconcile things. She just wanted me to be the one to blow things up so she could look innocent and play the sympathy card.
I'm seeing the same dynamic between the right and the libs.
Cool story, bro.
Here is an example: If you are not on their side, the Dems will offer you no sympathy. You have no value to them.
you don't get it. i can't sympathize with someone who voted for someone who stands for racism, xenophobia, homophobia, etc. you have voted for someone who doesn't believe in the things I think "make america great" - like the first amendment, diversity, etc. why am I not allowed to say that i'm not good with that? why do you think it's manipulative to express my viewpoint? i really feel like this country has elected someone not unlike hitler and it's horrifying to me that so many of my fellow americans voted for him. would you offer sympathy to someone who supported hitler? that's how it feels to me and that's why I can't offer sympathy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The libs are doing the same manipulative crap my ex wife did when we were going through counseling. Shes kept saying that it was me and I needed to fix this thing or that thing before she could move forward and no matter what I did it was never enough. I was living on egg shells for a long time. Looking back I can see that she never really wanted to reconcile things. She just wanted me to be the one to blow things up so she could look innocent and play the sympathy card.
I'm seeing the same dynamic between the right and the libs.
Cool story, bro.
Here is an example: If you are not on their side, the Dems will offer you no sympathy. You have no value to them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand how people are upset about Clinton's words calling for people to accept the election results but continue to fight misogyny not being "gracious" enough when their candidate is the least gracious person ever.
No matter what she did, it wouldn't be enough for you unless she spent 24/7 out there protesting the protests, so I guess by your own definition you are gas lighting us supposed gas lighters. This is getting confusing.
It's not about misogyny; it's about jobs and having enough money to pay bills and support one's family.
Well people aren't going to be able to do that if they don't have skills to offer. Our world has changed and these people's skill sets are obsolete. They didn't keep up with technology.
So you're saying what? Just screw them?
The free trade deals and insistence on unimpeded globalism could've been paired with an eye toward looking out for those who would be hurt.
Maybe place a higher value on training and/or being willing to leave their one-horse company town. Yes, we make a good living here, but neither of us could have done that in the towns we were raised in. It's not the government's job to prop you up because nobody wants the product your plant was selling.
Okay, so you're already Republicans. Fair enough.
So then why do the Trump voters want a free job handout??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You know, the left hasn't been oblivious to these people's problems. Obama has tried to pass an infrastructure jobs program that would create construction jobs all over the US but he couldn't get Republicans in Congress to pass it. Obama cared about these people and so does Clinton, but they couldn't get it through the Republicans.
I feel for these people, too. I have cousins in PA who are having a hard time getting by. Both my grandfathers were coal miners but now the biggest industry left in my hometown is funeral homes. I got a good education and have a good job, but I had to leave my hometown to get both.
There is this assumption out there that Democrats are heartless and don't care about the plight of these people, but it's not true. We care and we have always wanted to help them. Look at how Clinton really tried to make a difference with the water for the people of Flint. I submit that we certainly care and always will more than a charlatan like Trump does. It's just difficult to accomplish your agenda when Congress says NO at every step.
Clinton promised to put the Coal Mines out of work and destroy the industry, and now probably wonders how in the hell she lost Pennsylvania.
Brilliant strategy, that.
"We Are Going To Put A Lot Of Coal Miners & Coal Companies Out Of Business" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksIXqxpQNt0)
Telling them there's some future utopia of clean energy jobs (e.g. Solyndra) doesn't pay their mortgage next month, now does it? It was boldly stupid.
Genuine question: with your odd capitalization of 'Coal Mines,' are you posting from the U.S.?
Also, can you not see how PP addressed what you're talking about? Wanting to support infrastructure efforts as Obama attempted? Why can you not begin to address anything of substance?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You know, the left hasn't been oblivious to these people's problems. Obama has tried to pass an infrastructure jobs program that would create construction jobs all over the US but he couldn't get Republicans in Congress to pass it. Obama cared about these people and so does Clinton, but they couldn't get it through the Republicans.
I feel for these people, too. I have cousins in PA who are having a hard time getting by. Both my grandfathers were coal miners but now the biggest industry left in my hometown is funeral homes. I got a good education and have a good job, but I had to leave my hometown to get both.
There is this assumption out there that Democrats are heartless and don't care about the plight of these people, but it's not true. We care and we have always wanted to help them. Look at how Clinton really tried to make a difference with the water for the people of Flint. I submit that we certainly care and always will more than a charlatan like Trump does. It's just difficult to accomplish your agenda when Congress says NO at every step.
Clinton promised to put the Coal Mines out of work and destroy the industry, and now probably wonders how in the hell she lost Pennsylvania.
Brilliant strategy, that.
"We Are Going To Put A Lot Of Coal Miners & Coal Companies Out Of Business" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksIXqxpQNt0)
Telling them there's some future utopia of clean energy jobs (e.g. Solyndra) doesn't pay their mortgage next month, now does it? It was boldly stupid.
Genuine question: with your odd capitalization of 'Coal Mines,' are you posting from the U.S.?
Also, can you not see how PP addressed what you're talking about? Wanting to support infrastructure efforts as Obama attempted? Why can you not begin to address anything of substance?