Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I will remember her as a woman with the temerity to run twice knowing the odds were against her. That she took is further than we had ever gone before as women. She gave us a lot of hope. Her legacy is safe with me.
I'm pretty sure that everyone who was cheating for her benefit had her convinced she was a shoe-in.
I would be willing to bet she was smart enough to know her gender was always going to be a hurdle. And it was one she and we could not overcome.
Sure.
Hard to see how you're denying this when SHE IS NOT THE PRESIDENT ELECT.
NP. She lost for reasons that have absolutely nothing to do with her gender. The fact that she could not exploit this one huge advantage (let alone all others) deems her completely incapable, sorry.
Anonymous wrote:Hillary voter here:
I think she and Bill will flee the country. DoJ is going to bring some trumped up charges against her and other members of the Clinton inner circle. It will be a political witch hunt. Ugh.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I will remember her as a woman with the temerity to run twice knowing the odds were against her. That she took is further than we had ever gone before as women. She gave us a lot of hope. Her legacy is safe with me.
I'm pretty sure that everyone who was cheating for her benefit had her convinced she was a shoe-in.
I would be willing to bet she was smart enough to know her gender was always going to be a hurdle. And it was one she and we could not overcome.
Sure.
Hard to see how you're denying this when SHE IS NOT THE PRESIDENT ELECT.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I will remember her as a woman with the temerity to run twice knowing the odds were against her. That she took is further than we had ever gone before as women. She gave us a lot of hope. Her legacy is safe with me.
I'm pretty sure that everyone who was cheating for her benefit had her convinced she was a shoe-in.
I would be willing to bet she was smart enough to know her gender was always going to be a hurdle. And it was one she and we could not overcome.
Sure.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I will remember her as a woman with the temerity to run twice knowing the odds were against her. That she took is further than we had ever gone before as women. She gave us a lot of hope. Her legacy is safe with me.
I'm pretty sure that everyone who was cheating for her benefit had her convinced she was a shoe-in.
I would be willing to bet she was smart enough to know her gender was always going to be a hurdle. And it was one she and we could not overcome.
Anonymous wrote:As a Bernie Sanders supporter who did end up voting for Clinton, all I remember from DCUM Hillary supporters during the primaries was that
"She is the candidate who can get things done".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I will remember her as a woman with the temerity to run twice knowing the odds were against her. That she took is further than we had ever gone before as women. She gave us a lot of hope. Her legacy is safe with me.
I'm pretty sure that everyone who was cheating for her benefit had her convinced she was a shoe-in.
I would be willing to bet she was smart enough to know her gender was always going to be a hurdle. And it was one she and we could not overcome.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I will remember her as a woman with the temerity to run twice knowing the odds were against her. That she took is further than we had ever gone before as women. She gave us a lot of hope. Her legacy is safe with me.
I'm pretty sure that everyone who was cheating for her benefit had her convinced she was a shoe-in.
Anonymous wrote:- ignored subpoena for Rose Law Firm records, then left doctored records in WH library,
- insulted SAH moms when running as "co-president" on her husband's reputation
- botched healthcare
- I'm OK with her having to defend a child rapist in criminal court (it was her duty to zealous advocacy) but I'm not OK with her laughing and gloating about her role in getting him acquitted
-coined the ridiculous term "vast, right-wing conspiracy"
- supposedly left the WH "penniless" in her book (a ridiculous claim)
- carpet-bagged her way into a NY senate position, then did absolutely nothing while there
- worked a back-room deal with the Obama campaign for Sec. Of State; then committed crimes by mis-handling classified data
-told Wallstreet she maintains a public opinion and a private one (ie openly two faced).
Anonymous wrote:1) Selfish because she did not let a better Dem candidate run in the first place.
2) A failure, because after forcing herself in our faces she lost a race that Dems should have won easily.