Anonymous wrote:The reason this incident made the paper is not because it is a normal event, that people often shoot threatening (or nonthreatening) offleash dogs in parks. The reason WaPo wrote about this is because it is unusual, bizarre, crazy. Normal people don't shoot threatening offleash pit bulls or GSDs in parks, and normal people don't shoot offleash playful lab puppies in parks, either.
The Pet Forum in DCUM is not very pro-pet, so I understand why posters are condemning the dog owner for having her dog off leash. But shooting the dog is a huge overreaction and is quite possibly actionable even if the dog owner is not pressing charges. Gun nuts should be upset about this because it makes gun owners look crazed and irresponsible.
Anonymous wrote:Two pit bulls....300 stitches required for child...
http://www.ajc.com/news/local/gwinnett-boy-loses-ear-gets-300-stitches-after-neighbor-dogs-attack/5hQNcR59ZFqeXod6zfsE4M/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I feel bad for the dog. She died because her owner is an idiot. The owner should be fined. If you can't control your dog and let if jump on strangers, then you are too stupid to have a dog.
I agree. The owner should be charged with animal cruelty. She put her dog in that situation.
Dogs don't belong off leash in places where they end up jumping on humans. She has no way of knowing if that person her dog is jumping on has a severe fear of a dog, or an allergy, or a condition like brittle bones that puts them at risk from having a dog jump on them. I know that for my elderly mom, a jumping dog could easily mean another broken hip or pelvis.
The fact that it's a puppy makes it mouthier and less predictable, thus more dangerous.
Anonymous wrote:I feel bad for the dog. She died because her owner is an idiot. The owner should be fined. If you can't control your dog and let if jump on strangers, then you are too stupid to have a dog.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is why you take your dog to a fenced-in baseball diamond and exercise them there. So long as you do it when there's not a game or practice going on, you're not going to bother other people. You're not going to be stepping on other dogs' "residue" the way you do at a dog park. The dog gets exercise without you having to leash it or control it, so it can meet its natural instinct to explore. Win-win-win.
If I see you on our baseball diamond that my husband and sons work hard maintaining... Do you know how much money that costs? You know that's trespassing, right?
The level of entitlement & laziness with dog owners is way off the charts these days.
The level of entitlement with those who think this is the Wild West is off the charts these days.
The lady with the dog was wrong. 100%. But, if our inclination these days is just reach for the gun for anything and everything that frightens us . . . we have bigger problems in this country. While the man who shot the dog may not be criminally responsible, he lacks ethics and a moral foundation. He should not have a gun.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is why you take your dog to a fenced-in baseball diamond and exercise them there. So long as you do it when there's not a game or practice going on, you're not going to bother other people. You're not going to be stepping on other dogs' "residue" the way you do at a dog park. The dog gets exercise without you having to leash it or control it, so it can meet its natural instinct to explore. Win-win-win.
If I see you on our baseball diamond that my husband and sons work hard maintaining... Do you know how much money that costs? You know that's trespassing, right?
The level of entitlement & laziness with dog owners is way off the charts these days.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is why you take your dog to a fenced-in baseball diamond and exercise them there. So long as you do it when there's not a game or practice going on, you're not going to bother other people. You're not going to be stepping on other dogs' "residue" the way you do at a dog park. The dog gets exercise without you having to leash it or control it, so it can meet its natural instinct to explore. Win-win-win.
If I see you on our baseball diamond that my husband and sons work hard maintaining... Do you know how much money that costs? You know that's trespassing, right?
Anonymous wrote:This is why you take your dog to a fenced-in baseball diamond and exercise them there. So long as you do it when there's not a game or practice going on, you're not going to bother other people. You're not going to be stepping on other dogs' "residue" the way you do at a dog park. The dog gets exercise without you having to leash it or control it, so it can meet its natural instinct to explore. Win-win-win.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So it's ok to shoot the dog if the owner willingly let the dog off the leash vs. the dog slipping out?
That is not what people are saying. What people are saying here is that the owner intentionally left her untrained dog off the leash and is trying to play the victim after the dog went after someone aggressively and was shot. The owner is not a victim. This is entirely different than an owner who attempted to properly restrain the dog and the dog got out. The outcome may be the same, but in the first case, fault belongs to the owner and in the second case, it may not.
There were two crimes.
1. Dog off-leash
2. Animal cruelty/murder
Regardless if #1 happened or not, #2 happened and should be fully prosecuted. Either it's ok to shoot a playful dog in the park or it's not. Doesn't matter if the owner intentionally let it off the leash or if it was an accident.
Actually, an investigation found that the shooting of the dog was justified and no crime was committed.