Anonymous wrote:^^ I never come with oral. I've never liked it, even with guys who are such good lovers I know they are probably great at it (and do it enthusiastically).
Not everything works for everyone.
A good lover listens to the partner's body and goes with what's working.
There are few things worse than a man who thinks what he's doing is the gold standard and pretty much expects you to dig it.
Anonymous wrote:^^ I never come with oral. I've never liked it, even with guys who are such good lovers I know they are probably great at it (and do it enthusiastically).
Not everything works for everyone.
A good lover listens to the partner's body and goes with what's working.
There are few things worse than a man who thinks what he's doing is the gold standard and pretty much expects you to dig it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A man is not "selfish" in bed. A man is only "ineffective" and "lame" in bed. He is lacking in either endowment, stamina or technique.
Do you really think sex is just about PIV and that what makes it good is just slamming in and out as hard and as fast as you can? You sound like a teenaged boy with a porn addiction.
No what the pp and you think good sex is is the man working as hard as he can to get the woman off and the woman just laying there waiting to be "entertain". We hear all the time about men being bad in bed. New flash, 90% of women are horrible in bed. Seriously I think it's a combination of a lack of understanding male anatomy, not really caring about making sex enjoyable for your partner, performing some rope memory moves, thinking sex is a gift to the man, etc. Just because a guy gets off does not mean you are good in bed. A lot of times guys will finish quickly because they want to get it over with and move on. Remember the thread about Taylor Swift? Why her relationships with men do not last? Someone post she is bad in bed...that's the reason. Google Taylor Swift and bad in bed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A man is not "selfish" in bed. A man is only "ineffective" and "lame" in bed. He is lacking in either endowment, stamina or technique.
Do you really think sex is just about PIV and that what makes it good is just slamming in and out as hard and as fast as you can? You sound like a teenaged boy with a porn addiction.
No what the pp and you think good sex is is the man working as hard as he can to get the woman off and the woman just laying there waiting to be "entertain". We hear all the time about men being bad in bed. New flash, 90% of women are horrible in bed. Seriously I think it's a combination of a lack of understanding male anatomy, not really caring about making sex enjoyable for your partner, performing some rope memory moves, thinking sex is a gift to the man, etc. Just because a guy gets off does not mean you are good in bed. A lot of times guys will finish quickly because they want to get it over with and move on. Remember the thread about Taylor Swift? Why her relationships with men do not last? Someone post she is bad in bed...that's the reason. Google Taylor Swift and bad in bed.
Anonymous wrote:Mine's just not very good in bed. Like most men, he's too insecure to hear what I need because he interprets it as an insult to his manhood. The one time I said I didn't like something and asked for something else he lost his erection and then sulked. So now the tacit understanding is that it's better for him to have self esteem than for me to have pleasure, and they are mutually exclusive unless I find a way to like whatever he does.
I masturbate a lot and think about other people when I do it. When I'm with my husband I fake it weakly. Sometimes I don't fake it and then reassure him it's fine unpersuasively. I'm doing 90% of the work in bed and at home and equal work in the workplace so I feel my approach is generous enough.
At this point I'm not interested in having an affair but I could see myself doing so if someone caught my eye.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:After a long and varied pre-marriage sex life, I've come to a sad conclusion that bad lovers aren't trainable. I mean, you can probably teach them a few tricks and with luck, they will become a little better, but they will never be as good as a naturally good lover. Some men just are very much into exploring and pleasing women, and some are not. It's like a fine palate or taste for music. If you don't have one naturally, you can become a little better, but never as good as someone who is naturally inclined that way. We all gravitate to things we love, when we do it often, we become better, and it's a self-feeding virtuous circle. This is why good lovers are naturally good.
This. My husband has many great qualities but he's simply not good in bed. He doesn't have an innate desire to explore my body and please me. He isn't adventurous in bed. He's not up for having sex in places outside of our home or really even our bedroom. It took me a while to figure it out. I'm actually not even that sure he is attracted to me. I'm not going to be able to change him so I've accepted it. I do get concerned I'm going to lose it in my 40s and have an affair. I crave that desire and ability to please.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A man is not "selfish" in bed. A man is only "ineffective" and "lame" in bed. He is lacking in either endowment, stamina or technique.
Do you really think sex is just about PIV and that what makes it good is just slamming in and out as hard and as fast as you can? You sound like a teenaged boy with a porn addiction.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DH here, stop complaining and tell us exactly what you want to get the Big O! No hinting!
If you genuinely don't know what it takes but are willing to follow instructions, this post is not about you. This post is about men who don't care what it takes. Or they say they care, in theory, but don't really want to do any work to get there. I also need to tell you that when a man who doesn't naturally like giving oral is told to give oral, it never feels good.
DH here and in a million years I won't understand how any man doesn't like giving oral to his woman. One of the most intense, intimate, erotic things there is, and in my experience women never, ever come better than with oral
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A man is not "selfish" in bed. A man is only "ineffective" and "lame" in bed. He is lacking in either endowment, stamina or technique.
Or in my husband's case, lacking in all three
Anonymous wrote:A man is not "selfish" in bed. A man is only "ineffective" and "lame" in bed. He is lacking in either endowment, stamina or technique.
Anonymous wrote:A man is not "selfish" in bed. A man is only "ineffective" and "lame" in bed. He is lacking in either endowment, stamina or technique.
Anonymous wrote:A man is not "selfish" in bed. A man is only "ineffective" and "lame" in bed. He is lacking in either endowment, stamina or technique.
Anonymous wrote:I think it's far more common for women to refuse to perform oral than men. But men are usually just told to deal with it.
I don't think either sex should settle for plain Jane sex the rest of their lives, but it seems like men are generally more adventurous than women so they are more likely to complain about it. I hope you all also call non-performing women selfish in bed too.