Anonymous
Post 10/03/2016 18:09     Subject: About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We are at the point where believing Clinton is equally as unacceptable an alternative as Trump is is simply flying in the face of reality. When the guy in charge of investigating Clinton during Whitewater is coming out and endorsing her now over his own party's candidate because of her sound judgment (his words), you are exercising some serious powers of denial to throw in with Trump.

Good luck.


Who said anything about "throwing in with Trump"? He is as objectionable as Hillary but what I am not willing to do is hold my nose and vote for Hillary because she has been thrust on us.

I am hoping that millions of other voters - both Republican and Democrat - will take the same position.


No, I understand your position. You're refusing to vote for either of the two candidates who might actually win, choosing to see them as "equally unacceptable" and so risking with your protest vote that Trump might win. Despite the complete failure of judgment and temperament that you have seen from Trump over the last week, you think he's just as good as Clinton, and even though hundreds of security and policy and military experts have now crossed party lines to say they reject Trump and are voting for her, including the living Republican presidents. "Because she has been thrust on us" is your dumb reason, which fits right in line with Donald Trump's own childish, shortsighted, and narcissistic way of looking at things. Congratulations, nutjob, maybe you might as well just set the country on fire on your way to the polls, too.
Anonymous
Post 10/03/2016 18:08     Subject: About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]
Anonymous wrote:http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/03/us/politics/hillary-bill-clinton-women.html

The media has been protecting this woman her entire career. She is a first-rate liar. Lies about being named after Sir Edmund Hillary even though he climb Mt Everest 3 years after she was born. Lies about flying into an area where they took sniper fire even though video footage shows otherwise. Lies about youtube causing Benghazi. Claimed to not know the large letter "C" on internal documents meant classified.

Covers for her husband's abuse of women. Instead of divorcing Bill she destroys the women. Anything to further her career. Treats her subordinates terribly. Using her Secretary of State office and her Foundation to raise money for a campaign and fund her family's private jet lifestyle. Should be in a orange jumpsuit right now and not waddling around in her $10,000 custom made tents.

The media have covered for this women her entire career and now the house of cards is about to fall. She has no soul. She has no foundation. Her life is completely based on lies.


Yeah. Totally the not person I want leading my country.
God help us. The middle class can't afford 4 years after such a disasterous 8 years.
Anonymous
Post 10/03/2016 18:05     Subject: Re:About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Most thinking women care less about a woman who stayed in a marriage with a cheating spouse whom she shares a child with, and care more about a philanderer who has 3 wives and a rack of kids by 3 different women who is also a sexist obese pig who comments on women's weight.


I see a HUGE difference in the sexual predator of Bill Clinton and a man who married and had children within those marriages.


Right. If you ignore that he raped wife #1, cheated with wife #2 while married to wife #1, and brags about his conquests during his first marriage. Cool! Oh, and that he's been accused of rapid a child. And talks about how hot he thinks his daughter is. [/quote
That should say "raping" a child. Sadly.
Anonymous
Post 10/03/2016 18:04     Subject: Re:About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Most thinking women care less about a woman who stayed in a marriage with a cheating spouse whom she shares a child with, and care more about a philanderer who has 3 wives and a rack of kids by 3 different women who is also a sexist obese pig who comments on women's weight.


I see a HUGE difference in the sexual predator of Bill Clinton and a man who married and had children within those marriages.


Right. If you ignore that he raped wife #1, cheated with wife #2 while married to wife #1, and brags about his conquests during his first marriage. Cool! Oh, and that he's been accused of rapid a child. And talks about how hot he thinks his daughter is.
Anonymous
Post 10/03/2016 18:03     Subject: About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]
Why should we care that the marriage is a sham? Should we care that Melania only married Trump for his money, and he for her looks? She's a gold digger, and he's shallow. So what?
Anonymous
Post 10/03/2016 18:02     Subject: About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]
Anonymous wrote:Even with such a well written article, all you "open-minded liberals" still gave a closed mind. You just absolutely refuse to realize how unfit awoman is to represent our country.

Open you mind and you shall see something quite disturbing in your ideal candidate.


FIFY
Anonymous
Post 10/03/2016 18:02     Subject: About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Skipped your meds today, OP?

NP Good sample of a nasty poster with zero content to share, not even an opinion on the topic.


Yeah, but that op patted themselves on the back for "shutting down" a republican.

Like many liberals, they don't understand how pathetic their come-backs are.
Anonymous
Post 10/03/2016 18:00     Subject: Re:About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]
Anonymous wrote:Most thinking women care less about a woman who stayed in a marriage with a cheating spouse whom she shares a child with, and care more about a philanderer who has 3 wives and a rack of kids by 3 different women who is also a sexist obese pig who comments on women's weight.


I see a HUGE difference in the sexual predator of Bill Clinton and a man who married and had children within those marriages.
Anonymous
Post 10/03/2016 17:59     Subject: About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]
Even with such a well written article, all you "open-minded liberals" still gave a closed mind. You just absolutely refuse to realize how unfit the woman is to represent our country.

Open you mind and you shall see something quite disturbing in your ideal candidate.
Anonymous
Post 10/03/2016 17:35     Subject: About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]
Anonymous wrote:I'm a feminist. This article handles her involvement in taking down the women Bill had affairs with with kid gloves. Hillary is ruthless as a politician and THE thing that makes me queasy about her is the way she relentlessly worked to destroy Flowers and Lewinsky. Women who did not deserve to have their names and lives muddied because of her philandering husband. As a feminist this makes me sick. I'm voting for Gary Johnson.


Please, Flowers and Lewinsky were big girls. As a feminist myself, I believe neither of them deserve to be given a pass for their own poor decisions and behavior, which had fairly obvious and known consequences. They fucked around and lost. Any fool should have been able to predict that if they're fucking around with a powerful man, they would be dragged through the mud, so why do it and act like the victim?
Anonymous
Post 10/03/2016 17:27     Subject: About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm a feminist. This article handles her involvement in taking down the women Bill had affairs with with kid gloves. Hillary is ruthless as a politician and THE thing that makes me queasy about her is the way she relentlessly worked to destroy Flowers and Lewinsky. Women who did not deserve to have their names and lives muddied because of her philandering husband. As a feminist this makes me sick. I'm voting for Gary Johnson.


My 9 year old is better equipped to be president than Gary Johnson. At least my fourth grader knows what's happening in Aleppo and can name several world leaders.


People who vote for Johnson or Stein don't do so with the expectation that either will become president.

It is a protest vote because both Hillary and Trump are unacceptable alternatives. The only other option is not to vote at all or only vote for down ticket candidates.

I am hoping that Johnson and Stein will get enough votes to make a difference in the final outcome.


Thanks, Captain Obvious!

We understand why people are throwing away their vote in some sort of ridiculous protest (like a petulant child)...we just don't understand why they would waste their vote on a moron who has never heard of Aleppo and is incapable of naming a world leader. If you are looking for a write-in protest vote, consider my 9 year old...he follows current events and has been interested in politics for years. His name is Noah.
Anonymous
Post 10/03/2016 17:16     Subject: About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]
Anonymous wrote:We are at the point where believing Clinton is equally as unacceptable an alternative as Trump is is simply flying in the face of reality. When the guy in charge of investigating Clinton during Whitewater is coming out and endorsing her now over his own party's candidate because of her sound judgment (his words), you are exercising some serious powers of denial to throw in with Trump.

Good luck.


Who said anything about "throwing in with Trump"? He is as objectionable as Hillary but what I am not willing to do is hold my nose and vote for Hillary because she has been thrust on us.

I am hoping that millions of other voters - both Republican and Democrat - will take the same position.
Anonymous
Post 10/03/2016 17:13     Subject: About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don't understand Trump supporters take on this. If skank shaming is wrong, didn't Trump do this much more recently by trying to discredit Machado's remarks by saying she had been in a sex tape? A few days ago, in 2016, not 1996.

I'm sure you will have some rationalization for why a direct statement from Trump in the present day using a woman's sexual history to discredit her charges against him is okay, whereas Hillary is the devil, but it would sure be entertaining to hear it.


No takers, I see. Just more hypocrisy from the Trump camp who thinks they can have it both ways.

I think Clinton is not blameless here, but to me what Trump did was even worse because he is doing this shit now in 2016, and he is saying this stuff himself, in 2016, and not just participating in it twenty years ago. The idea of using a woman's sexual past to discredit the truth of her statements is much more understood as wrong today than it was in 1996.

Perhaps they are ignoring you? And apparently you had a rebuttal ready and no reason to present it. LOL
Anonymous
Post 10/03/2016 17:10     Subject: About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]
We are at the point where believing Clinton is equally as unacceptable an alternative as Trump is is simply flying in the face of reality. When the guy in charge of investigating Clinton during Whitewater is coming out and endorsing her now over his own party's candidate because of her sound judgment (his words), you are exercising some serious powers of denial to throw in with Trump.

Good luck.
Anonymous
Post 10/03/2016 17:05     Subject: About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm a feminist. This article handles her involvement in taking down the women Bill had affairs with with kid gloves. Hillary is ruthless as a politician and THE thing that makes me queasy about her is the way she relentlessly worked to destroy Flowers and Lewinsky. Women who did not deserve to have their names and lives muddied because of her philandering husband. As a feminist this makes me sick. I'm voting for Gary Johnson.


My 9 year old is better equipped to be president than Gary Johnson. At least my fourth grader knows what's happening in Aleppo and can name several world leaders.


People who vote for Johnson or Stein don't do so with the expectation that either will become president.

It is a protest vote because both Hillary and Trump are unacceptable alternatives. The only other option is not to vote at all or only vote for down ticket candidates.

I am hoping that Johnson and Stein will get enough votes to make a difference in the final outcome.