Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I lived in Foggy Bottom right after college and took the orange to and from work every day. I told my dad I saw a homeless guy defecating on the train. That weekend he bought me a new VW Jetta to drive to work and paid my building's parking fee for me. Lol.
Adorable story! If this freaked you out so much and you had more self responsibility and weren't a spoiled brat you would've bought it yourself!
A lot of us have taken the metro for 30 years and never seen anything like this. But it worked on daddy, good job!
That's a true story. I didn't tell him that to get a car, it just came up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I lived in Foggy Bottom right after college and took the orange to and from work every day. I told my dad I saw a homeless guy defecating on the train. That weekend he bought me a new VW Jetta to drive to work and paid my building's parking fee for me. Lol.
Adorable story! If this freaked you out so much and you had more self responsibility and weren't a spoiled brat you would've bought it yourself!
A lot of us have taken the metro for 30 years and never seen anything like this. But it worked on daddy, good job!
Anonymous wrote:I live in a big house near Metro and take it to work most days. We never ever ever use it on weekends or evenings. When we lived in DC we basically never used it even though we lived 5 mins away. The service is so awful and it's such a bad experience that lots of people are like us -- live very close to Metro, but very rarely use it. I guess if I didn't value my time or ever have to be on time to things and didn't care about my safety I would ride.
Anonymous wrote:I lived in Foggy Bottom right after college and took the orange to and from work every day. I told my dad I saw a homeless guy defecating on the train. That weekend he bought me a new VW Jetta to drive to work and paid my building's parking fee for me. Lol.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
have you actually been inside these houses? I can tell you that if these 2 homes were side by side, I'd pick the one that went for $2.5. look at the photos for when the SV home was last for sale more than a decade ago-- the photos are exactly the same- it has not been recently renovated. the SV house bathrooms are dark grey marble and brass - very very dated. it's really a look that will appeal most to people in their 60s/70s+. And SV homes are "underpriced" because of the munitions issue. There are a group of buyers who won't consider that area because of those environmental issues - which is a large reason for the difference in price. Believe what you want to believe, but the $500K price difference is NOT because of the metro proximity.
*blinks* *blinks again* Right.
are you the realtor for the 2nd house?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
have you actually been inside these houses? I can tell you that if these 2 homes were side by side, I'd pick the one that went for $2.5. look at the photos for when the SV home was last for sale more than a decade ago-- the photos are exactly the same- it has not been recently renovated. the SV house bathrooms are dark grey marble and brass - very very dated. it's really a look that will appeal most to people in their 60s/70s+. And SV homes are "underpriced" because of the munitions issue. There are a group of buyers who won't consider that area because of those environmental issues - which is a large reason for the difference in price. Believe what you want to believe, but the $500K price difference is NOT because of the metro proximity.
*blinks* *blinks again* Right.
are you the realtor for the 2nd house?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
have you actually been inside these houses? I can tell you that if these 2 homes were side by side, I'd pick the one that went for $2.5. look at the photos for when the SV home was last for sale more than a decade ago-- the photos are exactly the same- it has not been recently renovated. the SV house bathrooms are dark grey marble and brass - very very dated. it's really a look that will appeal most to people in their 60s/70s+. And SV homes are "underpriced" because of the munitions issue. There are a group of buyers who won't consider that area because of those environmental issues - which is a large reason for the difference in price. Believe what you want to believe, but the $500K price difference is NOT because of the metro proximity.
*blinks* *blinks again* Right.
Anonymous wrote:We bought our house for $1.2m which, rightly or wrongly, really isnt a remarkable amount for close-in neighborhoods in this area. We both take the metro to/from work. Don't use it much on weekends though. But if it were more reliable, we probably would use it more.
Anonymous wrote:
have you actually been inside these houses? I can tell you that if these 2 homes were side by side, I'd pick the one that went for $2.5. look at the photos for when the SV home was last for sale more than a decade ago-- the photos are exactly the same- it has not been recently renovated. the SV house bathrooms are dark grey marble and brass - very very dated. it's really a look that will appeal most to people in their 60s/70s+. And SV homes are "underpriced" because of the munitions issue. There are a group of buyers who won't consider that area because of those environmental issues - which is a large reason for the difference in price. Believe what you want to believe, but the $500K price difference is NOT because of the metro proximity.