Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you new here? They're all 45 year old first time moms.
Seriously, DC is like the GrannyMom capital of the world. And no, the alternative is not having kids at 20. Many, many people have kids in their early 30s before the grannies start going crazy about establishing their financial independence pre-kids.
I was in grad school in my early 30s, then working, traveling, having fun, making $$$. It's wonderful to have kids later in life. I was able to switch to a good paying job with great work - life balance because of the education and experience that I got pre-kids. Honestly, I feel bad for those moms who had kids early on, work in dead end jobs with no flexibility, never got established, cannot afford a nice spa day, gym, derm appointments, vacations, and have to shop at Sams.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone is going to be different.
I had both of mine in my late 30s - 37 and 38 to be exact.
I am now 47 and while I could get pregnant tomorrow probably (never any problems in that dept) and carry a baby to term, I would be ravaged by fatigue and very unhappy about sacrificing all my sleep for another 3-4 years thereafter.
I feel past it now. But not past it for my existing kids, just any new ones.
However, if you've NEVER had a kid and start at 45 and have one then I am more than sure it is 100% fine because I have friends who have done exactly that.
You think you could get pregnant with no issues at 47, 9 years after your last kid because you did not have fertility issues in your 30s? And full term, for sure, no both defects? I admire the confidence!
Anonymous wrote:Everyone is going to be different.
I had both of mine in my late 30s - 37 and 38 to be exact.
I am now 47 and while I could get pregnant tomorrow probably (never any problems in that dept) and carry a baby to term, I would be ravaged by fatigue and very unhappy about sacrificing all my sleep for another 3-4 years thereafter.
I feel past it now. But not past it for my existing kids, just any new ones.
However, if you've NEVER had a kid and start at 45 and have one then I am more than sure it is 100% fine because I have friends who have done exactly that.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you new here? They're all 45 year old first time moms.
Seriously, DC is like the GrannyMom capital of the world. And no, the alternative is not having kids at 20. Many, many people have kids in their early 30s before the grannies start going crazy about establishing their financial independence pre-kids.
I was in grad school in my early 30s, then working, traveling, having fun, making $$$. It's wonderful to have kids later in life. I was able to switch to a good paying job with great work - life balance because of the education and experience that I got pre-kids. Honestly, I feel bad for those moms who had kids early on, work in dead end jobs with no flexibility, never got established, cannot afford a nice spa day, gym, derm appointments, vacations, and have to shop at Sams.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you new here? They're all 45 year old first time moms.
Seriously, DC is like the GrannyMom capital of the world. And no, the alternative is not having kids at 20. Many, many people have kids in their early 30s before the grannies start going crazy about establishing their financial independence pre-kids.
I was in grad school in my early 30s, then working, traveling, having fun, making $$$. It's wonderful to have kids later in life. I was able to switch to a good paying job with great work - life balance because of the education and experience that I got pre-kids. Honestly, I feel bad for those moms who had kids early on, work in dead end jobs with no flexibility, never got established, cannot afford a nice spa day, gym, derm appointments, vacations, and have to shop at Sams. [/quote
SAMs has huge vats of mayo though. How could anyone not want to go there?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you new here? They're all 45 year old first time moms.
Seriously, DC is like the GrannyMom capital of the world. And no, the alternative is not having kids at 20. Many, many people have kids in their early 30s before the grannies start going crazy about establishing their financial independence pre-kids.
Anonymous wrote:married at 38, first baby at 39, second at 41. No fertility issues, but #2 was small for gestational age--a tiny baby at birth, but seems to have caught up. No known cause of small size, but perhaps due to environment in womb. Is now a happy, healthy, slightly chubby four year old.
Downsides: we wont be retiring early, i worry about dying before my kids are grown up, worry about being an old grandma who can't help out.