Anonymous wrote:The trouble with Luke is that it's my brothers name. He's still living; we aren't particularly close but not enemies. The child wouldn't be named after him...it'd be more like "we like the name, too!" Otherwise, Luke is perfect: masculine, biblical, strong, no S sound. We are on the fence about using it though.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. We, too, are waiting until birth to find out what we're having. As for asking my son, he's only 12 months.![]()
I like:
Mark
Luke
Adam
Paul
Walker
Anonymous wrote:The trouble with Luke is that it's my brothers name. He's still living; we aren't particularly close but not enemies. The child wouldn't be named after him...it'd be more like "we like the name, too!" Otherwise, Luke is perfect: masculine, biblical, strong, no S sound. We are on the fence about using it though.
Anonymous wrote:Hunter
Anonymous wrote:OP here. We, too, are waiting until birth to find out what we're having. As for asking my son, he's only 12 months.![]()
I like:
Mark
Luke
Adam
Paul
Walker
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Charlie is a girl's name now?
In the under 5 set, I know 3 little girls named Charlotte, nn Charlie. I know zero little boys named that.
I know and have seen exactly what you're talking about, but I think OP could name her kid Charles and call him Charlie and the world could follow along just fine.
Yeah, this. It is "trendy" as a girls name but still "classic" as a boys name. It isn't equivalent to Lindsay or another male name that is now almost exclusively female.
Anonymous wrote:What about Griffin?
Kind of for fun, my husband and I downloaded the app called Babyname which allows you guys to both swipe left or right on names and tells you when you have a match. Even if you don't do it with him, there are just a ton of ideas in there, so it might give you some inspiration?