Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The difference between PIV with a cut man and an uncut man are miles away.

Our bodies were meant to be intact. Maybe squeamish teens just need more experience and maturity.

Also since when do we allow teenage girls to decide the validity of medically unnecessary procedures on healthy infants?

I've been with both and saw no difference. Zero.

My cut DH wants to fuck like a teenager. It's actually quite annoying. I would have thought at 43 and 20 years of monogamy screwing the same damn woman, he'd want to slow down, but NOPE. If he were more sensitive, he would be able to stand a breeze.

Intact men keep female lubrication in place. Because the foreskin is intact he has sensation throughout his whole penis not just the base. There is also more control over ejaculation. Not to mention new studies that link circumcision with ED.

Anonymous wrote:The difference between PIV with a cut man and an uncut man are miles away.

Our bodies were meant to be intact. Maybe squeamish teens just need more experience and maturity.

Also since when do we allow teenage girls to decide the validity of medically unnecessary procedures on healthy infants?

I've been with both and saw no difference. Zero.

My cut DH wants to fuck like a teenager. It's actually quite annoying. I would have thought at 43 and 20 years of monogamy screwing the same damn woman, he'd want to slow down, but NOPE. If he were more sensitive, he would be able to stand a breeze.

Rule of thumb: never make a decision or form an opinion based on what a teenager "thinks"

The difference between PIV with a cut man and an uncut man are miles away.

Our bodies were meant to be intact. Maybe squeamish teens just need more experience and maturity.

Also since when do we allow teenage girls to decide the validity of medically unnecessary procedures on healthy infants?

I asked my 17 year old daughter and she said she and all her friends think uncut peni are HOTTTT!!!

Anonymous wrote:I'm 16 and think anteaters are gross. Most girls do too.

Yeah, sure you are.

I'm 16 and think anteaters are gross. Most girls do too.

I find it really sad that is it acceptable for females to speak about male genitalia like that.

If it were reversed and males were going on about being repulsed about about a vagina no one would find that acceptable.

Anonymous wrote:Your 17 yo and all her friends are sexually active?

Not the OP, but you sure are naive.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would never touch one? Oh, dear. You're missing out, honey. I know a lot of women in my age rage (around 40) who prefer uncirced.

First of all, how has she never seen her brother's penis before? My daughter bathed with friends or cousins starting before her first birthday. By 6, she understood some were cut and others were not, and how each looked. I'm pretty sure my teen is a lesbian, and I've never heard her or her friends talk about a preference. It seems like most kids are not circed these days. They're going to have trouble finding or figuring out who's cut.

If she's a lesbian she shouldn't have any trouble at all...

Right, but her friends aren't all lesbians.

Anonymous wrote:I'm 33 and would never touch an uncut penis., not sure about this generation though

The uncut man wouldn't touch you either, so win-win.
Sorry, OP, that it became a debate again. Why don't you use this as an opportunity to talk to her about it. How did this cutting even come about? Does she want to be cut? Show her the female circ videos on youtube and ask her what she thinks? Does she think it's ok to cut men and not woman? Does she think her girlfriends are mature and old enough to form an opinion that lasts a lifetime? Does she think what was ok decades ago is ok now? Do we still think the world is flat? Inform her that most European men are uncut. Are the less than American men? Does she think they are all suffering because uncut penises? No money to get them cut in Europe?
Ahh, bring her to me.
I'll tell you a true story from few years ago. Don't use the story to cut your kids or not ofcourse, but a group of European cyclists were kidnapped in middle east and kept for months. The kidnappers wanted to see if they were cut or not. They were not, none of them. I guess we can only speculate why they wanted to know it and whether they are safe and sound home now because of it.

Anonymous wrote:Just discussed this with 5 girlfriends last night. We all agreed that circed penises looked better and were cleaner. The only benefit we saw to leaving it intact was that there might be more sensation for the man. I was surprised they all preferred circed penises since many of them dated European or international men who weren't circumcised.

I'm surprised too since I've dated both and lived in Europe half my life. The circed ones ( Americans of different races) have been harder to please. I have to play drums and say:" sim-sala-bin-abbraca-dabra" to get them going. The uncirc'ed ones have been Latinos and Europeans. The best ones in bed have been Latinos and Europeans. Call it a coincidence if you want. Never a problem getting them going. They are actually ready at all times. The circed ones have sat around with half hard on and expect you to work on it like in videos.
Maybe I dated around too much and have slept with too many men, but the above is my "humble opinion". I could even list them in order of best to worst and the circ'ed ones would be at the bottom half.
Are these 5 girlfriends Americans? If they are, what difference does it make how many there are agreeing. Not to mention there's a reason you all are girlfriends. Myself on the other han, didn't discriminate when it came to sleeping with men. Call me what ever....
I have 2 sons. Wouldn't circ the 1st one if I could do it over again, but his father would probably insist on it since he is circ'ed.