Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here. I'm disappointed, though not surprised, that this has degenerated into an "is he married?" "who is guiltier?" "pathetic other woman!" conversation. Geez! Can't two people hit it off and want to knock boots without a referendum on their marital status? Why the assumption that this is adultery? I appreciate the responses that have stuck to the topic of how to have open, honest communication after a false start.

If you're too drunk and irresponsible to use protection and so immoral that you had a ONS with some guy from out of town, then the assumption that one or both of you is cheating is natural enough.

OP here: irresponsible I give you, but I see nothing immoral about enjoying myself sexually.

No you don't OP, and that's sad. If you're cheating yes immoral and/or if he's married same for him.

NP. The post said ONS were immoral, not just cheating. That's just stupid.

Anonymous wrote:At a conference I recently met and slept with a man from out of town. In our intoxicated state, we did not use protection. BIG mistake, I know. HUGE!

Now he is coming to my city for another conference and we plan to meet up again. I would like him to wear a condom this time. I do feel a bit stupid requesting this, though, since we already did it without. What do you think is the best way to request this without sounding like a damn fool? I am also interested in hearing what men would think of this--would you be super disappointed, think it sensible, what?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here. I'm disappointed, though not surprised, that this has degenerated into an "is he married?" "who is guiltier?" "pathetic other woman!" conversation. Geez! Can't two people hit it off and want to knock boots without a referendum on their marital status? Why the assumption that this is adultery? I appreciate the responses that have stuck to the topic of how to have open, honest communication after a false start.

If you're too drunk and irresponsible to use protection and so immoral that you had a ONS with some guy from out of town, then the assumption that one or both of you is cheating is natural enough.

OP here: irresponsible I give you, but I see nothing immoral about enjoying myself sexually.

No you don't OP, and that's sad. If you're cheating yes immoral and/or if he's married same for him.

Where did all this about cheating come from? Who said anything about cheating?

Some sadsack who is still trying to project her pathetic situation with a cheating DH onto every relationship post.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here. I'm disappointed, though not surprised, that this has degenerated into an "is he married?" "who is guiltier?" "pathetic other woman!" conversation. Geez! Can't two people hit it off and want to knock boots without a referendum on their marital status? Why the assumption that this is adultery? I appreciate the responses that have stuck to the topic of how to have open, honest communication after a false start.

If you're too drunk and irresponsible to use protection and so immoral that you had a ONS with some guy from out of town, then the assumption that one or both of you is cheating is natural enough.

OP here: irresponsible I give you, but I see nothing immoral about enjoying myself sexually.

No you don't OP, and that's sad. If you're cheating yes immoral and/or if he's married same for him.

Where did all this about cheating come from? Who said anything about cheating?

Anonymous wrote:OP wouldn't answer her marital status or the guy she hooked up with.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I call troll. This person wants to rile up people.

Who in their right mind would get riled up about an adult asking about a procedural issue involving consensual sex?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here. I'm disappointed, though not surprised, that this has degenerated into an "is he married?" "who is guiltier?" "pathetic other woman!" conversation. Geez! Can't two people hit it off and want to knock boots without a referendum on their marital status? Why the assumption that this is adultery? I appreciate the responses that have stuck to the topic of how to have open, honest communication after a false start.

If you're too drunk and irresponsible to use protection and so immoral that you had a ONS with some guy from out of town, then the assumption that one or both of you is cheating is natural enough.

OP here: irresponsible I give you, but I see nothing immoral about enjoying myself sexually.

No you don't OP, and that's sad. If you're cheating yes immoral and/or if he's married same for him.

Where did all this about cheating come from? Who said anything about cheating?

Anonymous wrote:I call troll. This person wants to rile up people.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here. I'm disappointed, though not surprised, that this has degenerated into an "is he married?" "who is guiltier?" "pathetic other woman!" conversation. Geez! Can't two people hit it off and want to knock boots without a referendum on their marital status? Why the assumption that this is adultery? I appreciate the responses that have stuck to the topic of how to have open, honest communication after a false start.

If you're too drunk and irresponsible to use protection and so immoral that you had a ONS with some guy from out of town, then the assumption that one or both of you is cheating is natural enough.

OP here: irresponsible I give you, but I see nothing immoral about enjoying myself sexually.

No you don't OP, and that's sad. If you're cheating yes immoral and/or if he's married same for him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here. I'm disappointed, though not surprised, that this has degenerated into an "is he married?" "who is guiltier?" "pathetic other woman!" conversation. Geez! Can't two people hit it off and want to knock boots without a referendum on their marital status? Why the assumption that this is adultery? I appreciate the responses that have stuck to the topic of how to have open, honest communication after a false start.

If you're too drunk and irresponsible to use protection and so immoral that you had a ONS with some guy from out of town, then the assumption that one or both of you is cheating is natural enough.

OP here: irresponsible I give you, but I see nothing immoral about enjoying myself sexually.

No you don't OP, and that's sad. If you're cheating yes immoral and/or if he's married same for him.

Anonymous wrote:I call troll. This person wants to rile up people.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A man here. Very sad. OP, you sound desperate. If you can't ask for what you want, then you're pathetic.

NP. How about it's sad that the man doesn't just have condoms and use them automatically without having to be asked?

Exactly. Not only that, but it shows this guy has been sleeping all over the place without using them. OP shouldn't sleep with him since he could have a STD that even he doesn't know about....yet. Not bright at all - both.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here. I'm disappointed, though not surprised, that this has degenerated into an "is he married?" "who is guiltier?" "pathetic other woman!" conversation. Geez! Can't two people hit it off and want to knock boots without a referendum on their marital status? Why the assumption that this is adultery? I appreciate the responses that have stuck to the topic of how to have open, honest communication after a false start.

If you're too drunk and irresponsible to use protection and so immoral that you had a ONS with some guy from out of town, then the assumption that one or both of you is cheating is natural enough.

OP here: irresponsible I give you, but I see nothing immoral about enjoying myself sexually.