Anonymous wrote:Things like this happen at Montessori schools. Their model ENCOURAGES very large class sizes with not many teachers so the kids are "learning from each other." The teacher/student ratio is one big reason we're leaving Montessori in a few months.
asamel01 wrote:Original poster here. I am not exactly sure of how long the child was left, but I was at the park from 3-6 and it was a good amount of time from when the last class left until I discovered the child, who was so hysterical she could not even tell me her name. Had she not had the Franklin scarf on, she would have gone into police custody and her parents would have shown up to get her only to realize no one knew where she was. Can you even imagine the panic as a parent? The police were called and arrived just as the owner Randy whisked the child away. Randy was rude and ungracious (I held the crying child in my arms for at least 15 minutes) and she admitted to my face that the girl had been left behind. The police interviewed me and then said they were heading straight to the school. Keep in mind that there is a police hunt for a man who has been trying to lure school children into his car in this exact neighborhood. She would have been easy prey because she was scared and helpless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bump. Any updates?
That's pretty terrifying. It suggests that the procedures often aren't followed, but that other times they got lucky and the kids were all where they were supposed to be. If you have bad procedures, you can make changes to the procedures. If you have good procedures but even the head of the school ignores them -- never mind what the teachers do -- that is really scary.
Exactly.
It shows that the procedures were flawed/had holes in them. In particular, depending on a single person as the ultimate safeguard against something terrible like this happening doesn't work. Because people are imperfect and make mistakes.
This is exactly right. When this happened the first time, the big solution was (in addition to counting the kids 3 times) was that Randy was to accompany the kids on every outing to the park. Thus, rather than train the existing staff on adhering to procedures (and/or having more experienced staff and/or more staff go on these outings), she became the solution. The whole thing rested on her, and everyone makes mistakes. She made a mistake and there weren't any other safeguards in place.
Anonymous wrote:So what other procedures are not followed?
Leaving cleaning chemicals accessible to students? Security doors?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bump. Any updates?
That's pretty terrifying. It suggests that the procedures often aren't followed, but that other times they got lucky and the kids were all where they were supposed to be. If you have bad procedures, you can make changes to the procedures. If you have good procedures but even the head of the school ignores them -- never mind what the teachers do -- that is really scary.
Exactly.
It shows that the procedures were flawed/had holes in them. In particular, depending on a single person as the ultimate safeguard against something terrible like this happening doesn't work. Because people are imperfect and make mistakes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bump. Any updates?
Is there specific info you're looking for? The Head of School sent out a letter to the parents, in which she basically apologized and said she thought the procedures they put in place two years ago are the correct procedures but that she failed to follow them. I doubt the school will volunteer what, if anything, the State Department of Education does in response. I also don't know if the students' parents plan on switching schools, but would probably not share that information on here if I did know.
That's pretty terrifying. It suggests that the procedures often aren't followed, but that other times they got lucky and the kids were all where they were supposed to be. If you have bad procedures, you can make changes to the procedures. If you have good procedures but even the head of the school ignores them -- never mind what the teachers do -- that is really scary.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My son was in daycare when the first Franklin incident occurred. I remember thinking that that could never happen at our school, since we generally had a 4-5 /1 pupil teacher ratio.
I don't understand how Franklin is keeping its license with such ratios. Are they even NAEYC accredited? I get that people like the Montessori model, but the school's first duty is to keep your child safe. If they can't do that, what does it matter if your kid is "becoming a self-directed learner".
Same here - my kids are now in elementary but I don't understand why parents shell out crazy money for Franklin given its track record. The center we used took kids outside 2x every day and over almost 9 years (multiple kids) nothing remotely like this ever happened. No one should settle for a school that can't even keep track of the kids it has enrolled.